17 minutes ago, mattwill said:

seven carries for 16 Yards

vs.

seven carries for 21 yards

Which do you choose?

If you or I didn't post it would be well over 50 straight rambling posts LOL

19 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

No MAs regurgitated Rosie don’t pay a RB mentality forever. Pointed out how historically the teams had less than like two mil paid to their entire RB room. With thinking of champions can only do it the way it’s been previously done. Flawed logic all the way!

"Rosie" lmao

20 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

No MAs regurgitated Rosie don’t pay a RB mentality forever. Pointed out how historically the teams had less than like two mil paid to their entire RB room. With thinking of champions can only do it the way it’s been previously done. Flawed logic all the way!

LMFAO- CLUELESS

I'm off to watch Klare for OSU and maybe see some linemen

51 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Does Bolton grab that fumble scoop and score if Seumalo just attempts to do his job? (That’s on the second play after screwing up the gimme first down under Hurts)

Seumalo absolutely did his job. Follow the YouTube link below and look at the video of the play.

Unbalanced line to the left. Seumalo is the lone lineman to the right of the Center. His first level blocking assignment is the Chiefs’ Left DE, #56 George Karlaftis. Bolton would be a second level blocking assignment for either an Eagles O-Lineman or an Eagles RB. That is Football 101. But the Eagles are in an empty set, so no RB to pick up the LB. Seumalo kick steps to face Karlaftis, who mush rushes. Hurts takes his initial step to the left, the unbalanced strong side, but he doesn’t like what he sees and cuts back to the right, right into the path of Bolton. Seumalo is executing his assignment, and has engaged the mush rushing Karlaftis.

30 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

No MAs regurgitated Rosie don’t pay a RB mentality forever. Pointed out how historically the teams had less than like two mil paid to their entire RB room. With thinking of champions can only do it the way it’s been previously done. Flawed logic all the way!

No logic involved at all … flawed or otherwise. Joe was simply making a factual observation about what the Eagles were doing vis-a-vis paying RBs. Reporting simple facts that are right there in front of everyone’s eyes to see.

Your agenda makes you blind.

OSU just SO good!! Even without their star WR. Rookie frosh QB. Jackson at RB is killin it. Smith is another outstanding WR

Sayin going to be a GREAT NFL QB whoever snags him in 4 years(Just sayin LOL). BU QB, doing a fantastic job

27 minutes ago, mattwill said:

No logic involved at all … flawed or otherwise. Joe was simply making a factual observation about what the Eagles were doing vis-a-vis paying RBs. Reporting simple facts that are right there in front of everyone’s eyes to see.

Your agenda makes you blind.

He wanted to pay Sanders 4+ million a year

OSU- Iniss woud be an excellent slot pick up for us. Right now he is a late late UDFA. If I can get him there I do it

5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Nope,,,difference lies in tampering definition understandings. Everything I’ve discussed is tampering. You aren’t actually referring to just all tampering is your problem. You are talking about one specific type of tampering.

Again...you brought up the Barkley situation...and then brought up a totally different subject that had nothing to do with the Barkley situation.

You see other people on here trying to explain this to you and yet you are still dying on that hill.

Doesn't matter if what you were trying to talk about was correct or not, it wasn't relevant to the situation.

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Did this actual make sense in your mind to illustrate any point whatsoever?

If I had a dollar for every time I read your posts, my kids college would already be paid....both of them!

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Just answered directly

More than a dozen question rations straight. Calling flat BS on you. I’ll quote myself on each answer if it’s really needed…though it’s all right before you just made this comment. Really? Really!

You answer every time with... " i just answered " but don't ever give an answer..

Just state that you gave an answer. It's interesting how people come on here and you can't grasp the fact that you are perceived as the village idiot? Just baffling?

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Again you and No MAs both claim I don’t answer questions directly…I mean right on the two is of a couple of pages of me answering a dozen questions at least.

Dude...go back and read some posts from the last couple of days... you think it's just me and Cap that say you don't answer a question? Lol. GB, BG, Tate, Matt, Lambo...all have said it.

Wow the narcissistic mindset you have is just off the charts!

5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m not the one missing it. Tampering…just isn’t what you two are referring to. That’s a main key issue. Your are referring to one specific form of tampering only,

Tampering...for the specific situation regarding Barkley...and Cousins... was simply if there was direct contact with the player. That's it. The other 22 ways if Tampering don't matter, it was One...1...Uno... type of specific Tampering that was being investigated. Your original post showed that you didn't understand this, I tried to explain, yet once your mind wanders off topic ...that's it. Your ego or just your lack of attention... or maybe just want you want to be the narrative ...that takes over and the actual reality of a situation...you completely miss.

5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

To me the fact every team tampers was relevant. Followed up by my low level of concern.

Because to you...reality of a specific situation...takes a back seat to what is happening on planet Ham.

We weren't going to lose a draft pick...zero chance...because Howie doesn't talk directly to players. He is well experienced in signing free agents...notice the second word....agents.

Every team may tamper in the manner that you think.....irrelevant to what the Eagles were being investigated for. You are like talking to a wall.

14 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

You answer every time with... " i just answered " but don't ever give an answer..

Just state that you gave an answer. It's interesting how people come on here and you can't grasp the fact that you are perceived as the village idiot? Just baffling?

It actually isn’t baffling. He doesn’t give any direct answers to direct questions. What he gives are dissertations that talk all around the question, but never directly address the specific question. It is a text book example of, "If you can’t bedazzle with brilliance, baffle with BS.”

4 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Great tune

3 hours ago, mattwill said:

No logic involved at all … flawed or otherwise. Joe was simply making a factual observation about what the Eagles were doing vis-a-vis paying RBs. Reporting simple facts that are right there in front of everyone’s eyes to see.

Your agenda makes you blind.

See...with Ham, everything is extreme. Like you just saw...because multiple people on here don't think " the MOST important thing" is Gibbs catching balls. Ham automatically translates that as.. we don't think it's important at all.

So when I point out that Howie isn't paying just an above average RB...and neither would I ( see Ham was pissed at losing Sanders...similar to why he keeps mentioning Isaiah Rodgers at CB) ... he doesn't get the concept of not overpaying average talent like they are stars... he would overpay every position instead of taking a slight step back.

So because neither me or Howie wanted to pay $6mil for Sanders...that meant we didn't want to pay RB at all. My point and you saw Howie agree....Barkley was way above the idea of just paying " A RB" Barkley was elite level...game changer. Not Miles Sanders or Isaiah Rodgers types that just plug a hole.

That type of player is worth spending money on...regardless of position.

We didn't spend money on LB....until Baun...Baun was elite, that's why he got paid. Ham wants to spend spend and spend just to plug holes. He has no clue that good franchises don't over pay just to plug every hole. Then it sets the rate for the entire team.

That's why we get rid of guys when they don't show value... like a Reddick or a Huff.

The old Howie tried to plug holes by spending...never worked out.

4 hours ago, Lambo said:

Why couldn’t the Eagles have won a Super Bowl with a 1200 yard lead rusher last year? With Jalen Hurts as the QB, and those skill guys and the best O Line in football, should have been able to plug anyone in.

Dude...you opened pandora's box. Lol

3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

He wanted to pay Sanders 4+ million a year

$6 million per

3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

He wanted to pay Sanders 4+ million a year

Remember he call Sanders a " special talent"

1 hour ago, joemas6 said:

See...with Ham, everything is extreme. Like you just saw...because multiple people on here don't think " the MOST important thing" is Gibbs catching balls. Ham automatically translates that as.. we don't think it's important at all.

So when I point out that Howie isn't paying just an above average RB...and neither would I ( see Ham was pissed at losing Sanders...similar to why he keeps mentioning Isaiah Rodgers at CB) ... he doesn't get the concept of not overpaying average talent like they are stars... he would overpay every position instead of taking a slight step back.

So because neither me or Howie wanted to pay $6mil for Sanders...that meant we didn't want to pay RB at all. My point and you saw Howie agree....Barkley was way above the idea of just paying " A RB" Barkley was elite level...game changer. Not Miles Sanders or Isaiah Rodgers types that just plug a hole.

That type of player is worth spending money on...regardless of position.

We didn't spend money on LB....until Baun...Baun was elite, that's why he got paid. Ham wants to spend spend and spend just to plug holes. He has no clue that good franchises don't over pay just to plug every hole. Then it sets the rate for the entire team.

That's why we get rid of guys when they don't show value... like a Reddick or a Huff.

The old Howie tried to plug holes by spending...never worked out.

Pfffffft You're just a hater 🤣

1 hour ago, joemas6 said:

  6 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

OT- I stole the pic off the net because of Hams droning. However, this example is quite rare. if you notice the center section was never cut out(in the 70's we had discs that filled in that hole so you could play them on stereos). There are not many of these around, most were removed before being sent to record shops/distributors). The example shown was the demo sent out to DJ's. Very rare, and worth a dang fortune. So why was this? Keeping the center section in prevented warping during shipping because the demos were sent individually. The center hole was drilled to play on DJ turntables(aka 33 RPM posts). The ones you and I could buy had the centers cut out(and smoothed and were shipped with many pressed together in the box and if the end ones warped, no big deal toss them but most had wood on the ends in shipping or thick carboard to prevent warps). You can see it was pressed this way by the continuous line of the logo/label. Just an FYI in case this is your final Jeopardy question LOL. I forget the song but one DJ put one of these on and forgot to change the speed. It was hilarious hearing a 45 at 33 RPM blasting over the airwaves. Class dismissed

1 hour ago, joemas6 said:

$6 million per

Oh my bad, that's even worse