LMAO, he played at FL and I should know this stuff. But watching FL I was always looking at the skill positions. Which is another misnomer, line play takes SKILL

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

But you know if Hurts isn't going to play the posirtion......................

SO can FJ be the new Becton?

That's my thoughts.

If Lane retires I believe Becton carries more weight(human mass) than Lane.

2 minutes ago, EaglesTD123 said:

That's my thoughts.

Great minds think alike, then again so do we 🤣

IDK I would like to have Becton back also. Both he and FJ are versatile. One or the other could be used as relief, but with the constant 3 and outs it's not like the O line gets gassed

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

If Lane retires I believe Becton carries more weight than Lane.

I don't understand. Define weight. As in physical mass or more significant.

1 minute ago, EaglesTD123 said:

I don't understand. Define weight. As in physical mass or more significant.

I fixed the post LOL

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

IDK I would like to have Becton back also. Both he and FJ are versatile. One or the other could be used as relief, but with the constant 3 and outs it's not like the O line gets gassed

I'm telling ya (I know you already know) and everyone else, this O would be way more explosive - barring better OL play - with McKee slinging the ball. The running game, which is every QB's BFF, needs huge improvement though. Tank needs to get the ball more. He was effective everytime he got a carry.

3 minutes ago, EaglesTD123 said:

I don't understand. Define weight. As in physical mass or more significant.

If Lane retired he would have no significance, but I fixed the post anyhow

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

If Lane retired he would have no significance, but I fixed the post anyhow

Becton at G and FJ at T would work for sure.

Just now, EaglesTD123 said:

I'm telling ya (I know you already know) and everyone else, this O would be way more explosive - barring better OL play - with McKee slinging the ball.

IDK what we do about McKee. Seems like a waste of talent to keep him as a BU. Trading him is an option, but with Hurts "agreement" IDK what Lurie expects Siri to do. We won "scrapers" early in the year, but that was before we knew about this agreement that Hurts isn't going to bust anymore and will skate doing the minimum possible. Hurts waited for the big money, now Howie is stuck with him

3 minutes ago, EaglesTD123 said:

Becton at G and FJ at T would work for sure.

Or vice versa with the beef on the outside while we draft and bring up young uns at Stoutland U. Lane not going to last forever

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Or vice versa with the beef on the outside while we draft and bring up young uns at Stoutland U. Lane not going to last forever

Agreed.

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

IDK what we do about McKee. Seems like a waste of talent to keep him as a BU. Trading him is an option, but with Hurts "agreement" IDK what Lurie expects Siri to do. We won "scrapers" early in the year, but that was before we knew about this agreement that Hurts isn't going to bust anymore and will skate doing the minimum possible. Hurts waited for the big money, now Howie is stuck with him

McKee lit up the place with the 2's and I would love to see him play with the 1's

6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

McKee lit up the place with the 2's and I would love to see him play with the 1's

No doubt here.

Apparently we have interest in a Slay return likely sure up the secondary some chemistry already there between most of them

2 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Apparently we have interest in a Slay return likely sure up the secondary some chemistry already there between most of them

I’d be good with the move but I’m not sure it will sure up the secondary…

On 12/1/2025 at 5:04 PM, cunninghamtheman said:

Just having a winning season is underachieving. Is this something you can understand?

that's not what you said, and you know it, tinkerbell. so, save your typical delusional, circle jerk debate.

you said this ....

Doesn’t work in my book to repeat, no thanks

so, the season after the eagles just win a SB, you don't want a repeat.

just admit that you made a dumb statement or worded your post very poorly and move on.

(disclaimer - i know you won't)

23 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

After the "Hurts s not going to run" Agreement that was disclosed, it's not hard to see why Barkley and the birds are having a rough year on offense.

I mean hurts not wanting to run is shame since his legs are his best asset. And likely would help the ground game more…. But I also don’t fault Hurts for the OL failures this year not being able to win blocks upfront. We are just losing 1 on 1 battles on the lines…. Saquon getting hit 50% in the backfield isn’t just Hurts not wanting to run plenty of team run well without a mobile QB

To be somewhat fair to the OL they just are not healthy. Landon was injured preseason and rushed back for week 1, Cam had been in and out of the lineup, and Lane obviously.

Steen been alright but clearly not the same caliber run blocker as Becton.

Malaita has been the real head scratcher for me though lot of stupid mistakes this season from him and clearly not been playing well wonder if he is trying to cover more for Dickerson???

I’m still all for this team changing things up if we can’t get the O going by halftime against the chargers.

I think Tank needs more carries regardless think he is avg. like 8 yards a carry in his limited reps this year just gives a good change up to Barkley

Tanner McKee had success if Patullo/Siri are the major issue making this shift should only highlight it more with QB1 on the bench but also think it would spark a wake up call to the rest of the team that QB1 got benched for a half.

Side note I missed on the run game heard Geodart has been quite bad this season as a run blocker which is uncharacteristic for him since he was generally one of the better blocking TEs in the league

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Why do we even have Dillon?

Mmmmmm I think he was in the plans originally but fell out of favor once we trade for Tank…. To be fair tank has looked really good when given carries think he has easily been our best RB this season outside of Saquon when he gets blocks

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Like tank alot,hope we keep him around

Well we have tank under contract until 2027 so unless we trade him he should be here….

We have an out in Saquon contract in 2027 as well be curious to see what we opt to go when we get to that point.

We active Epps from IR and talks we could be looking at Slay reunion could sure up the secondary with guys that have played together for some years.

Well maybe not Epps he was here with Dejan/Q was he? But played with Reed and Slay(if we resign)