6 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

On a run how do you get called for OPI? My god man…feel bad for you.

So, once again you are asking a 185 pound WR to make a meaningful block on a guy 100 pounds(if it's a LB) more than he is???? How many pro DB's are going to fall for a WR block? DB's are trained to block and tackle WR's are not..feel bad for you

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So, once again you are asking a 185 pound WR to make a meaningful block on a guy 100 pounds(if it's a LB) more than he is???? How many pro DB's are going to fall for a WR block? DB's are trained to block and tackle WR's are not..feel bad for you

A TE or a BIG WR can block because he has MASS, a skinny WR? not hardly and you risk injuring that player. You really want that?

12 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

On a run how do you get called for OPI? My god man…feel bad for you.

I deleted that post,but once again if it's an RPO he could easily be caught with an OPI call if the QB doesn't throw it on a roll out, because now it's unclear to the ref if it's a run or pass play

15 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

On a run how do you get called for OPI? My god man…feel bad for you.

So you really want to put Smitty/Dotson at risk like that? It's not going to end well

Hurts takes the hike,rolls out. Is that a running or pass play??? How does the ref know??

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Hurts takes the hike,rolls out. Is that a running or pass play??? How does the ref know??

Answer please

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Answer please

You want Smitty to block or not???

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

You want Smitty to block or not???

Answer please

12 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Hurts takes the hike,rolls out. Is that a running or pass play??? How does the ref know??

If he passes it becomes a passing play…simple

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

If he passes it becomes a passing play…simple

Then if he blocks, he gets flagged. Simple

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Then if he blocks, he gets flagged. Simple

At any rate I PAY blockers. I don't PAY WR's to block. Minimal impact if any. Maybe a chip block, not much more with a lightweight like Smitty or Dotson. Like I said if you wanted to talk like Wilson, you could have an argument, but not those 2. Bad examples

6 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

That is hindsight. There is no way to know until you play the snaps. If Siri can't read them right.that's on him

It was the right call. Dude misses the long FG and we would have been set up well. He makes it and now we know what we need to get

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We ended up kicking a field goal from the 12. 2 yard line back to the 12 yard line…THATS BACKWARDS

The penalty was why it went backwards

..Barkley didn't lose any yardage...the backwards was a holding penalty on a TD that was called back

6 hours ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

what?

Lol

We are looking to be setup fairly nicely now on the run game. Saquan gaining traction. Lane will be back. More QB runs. This is looking positive for us for when we’ll need it.

23 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Google....had there ever been an NFL player to have 2 turnovers on the same snap. Please copy the answer on here

Yes apparently….I was told by at least 30 people today…only one other time…in 1978.

23 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Not much help needed with 5 turnovers. IDK if anyone has ever been picked then fumbled on the same play? I mean in NFL history? The TIP was a great play, the INT guy just happened to be there. Should not have forced that ball into double coverage at that time. A QB can count on a few drops per game, you have to live with those and keep playing. Hurts didn't. AJ made some great plays too

Watch the final play again. It was not thrown into double coverage. Poorly designed play as the defender on another receiver, Geodert I think, peeled off Goedert AFTER Hurts released the ball and was able to deflect it into his teammate guarding Dotson. It was a great defensive play. Now, should Hurts have thrown it there on 1st down? Thats my issue with that decision. Tight window. NO NEED TO TAKE THAT RISK AT THAT POINT.

10 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

No way…want the ball first for sure

Disagree. Want the ball second with the rule change. They were not rushing to score…had plenty of time. And 4 downs. No brainer.

41 minutes ago, Senhorcook said:

Watch the final play again. It was not thrown into double coverage. Poorly designed play as the defender on another receiver, Geodert I think, peeled off Goedert AFTER Hurts released the ball and was able to deflect it into his teammate guarding Dotson. It was a great defensive play. Now, should Hurts have thrown it there on 1st down? Thats my issue with that decision. Tight window. NO NEED TO TAKE THAT RISK AT THAT POINT.

One guy tipped it, the other caught it? You could be right about the peel off, still, Hurts should have known not to throw it. Tried to force it in. He should know better after 5+ years. We also know(even if he doesn't) that he has a tendency to underthrow

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We are looking to be setup fairly nicely now on the run game. Saquan gaining traction. Lane will be back. More QB runs. This is looking positive for us for when we’ll need it.

Buffalo. The other 3 should be easy wins. If we can't look impressive vs those then we're 1 and done and we keep the door open for Dullaz which irks me to no end

52 minutes ago, Senhorcook said:

Yes apparently….I was told by at least 30 people today…only one other time…in 1978.

Nope, that was 2 runs, this was the first pick off and fumble in NFL history, but if you counted them only as "turnovers" you are correct

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We are looking to be setup fairly nicely now on the run game. Saquan gaining traction. Lane will be back. More QB runs. This is looking positive for us for when we’ll need it.

He had a nice game(so did AJ). Hard to see that as gaining traction. It's a trend of 1 right now

6 hours ago, Senhorcook said:

Disagree. Want the ball second with the rule change. They were not rushing to score…had plenty of time. And 4 downs. No brainer.

Then you kick a field goal to tie it and the team got the ball first gets a second chance to score…for the win or tie. Seen this several times now. Team gets the ball first in OT gets more than one opportunity with the ball…while second team with OT ball only gets one. It’s 10 minute OT.

7 hours ago, Senhorcook said:

Disagree. Want the ball second with the rule change. They were not rushing to score…had plenty of time. And 4 downs. No brainer.

Pressure was on to score a TD after initial team kicked a field goal….not much advantage there.

6 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

He had a nice game(so did AJ). Hard to see that as gaining traction. It's a trend of 1 right now

AJ had a real rough gane….what were you watching? If nothing else I’ve posted video of at least three drops by AJ. One turned into a turnover interception.