June 3, 20241 yr Author 4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: Nailed the prediction on this Justin Jefferson contract
June 3, 20241 yr Author 4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: The Washington Football Team says it will no longer make contributions to Original Americans Foundation, which was founded by Daniel Snyder. Sounds like this is the second attempt to buy Native American support. Yet those "offended and oppressed real Americans" want the name BACK to Redskins. It was a sign of respect(which you fail to grasp). Just like many team names. The packers-respect for those that work that industry. ND Fighting Irish-respect for the struggle of the Irish(who were actually the first SLAVES) NE Patriots-respect for Patriotic Americans(originally the BOSTON Patriots so if I am from the south should I be offended???). Some teams are named to show strength such as the RAIDERS or strong animals in nature(Panthers,Lions,Eagles, Bears, Dolphins etc) And this is just the NFL. Anyway back to football. I will call them the WUSS(because they caved to left wing pressure) until they change back. If they never do,they will remain the WUSS in my terminology because it's MY terminology and you have no say in that. Sell the team to the real indians and let them name then whatever they want,but as you see MOST want it changed back,so argue with the indians
June 3, 20241 yr Author 4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: Less than four years after that announcement, the Original Americans Foundation was nearly a million dollars in the red. According to IRS filings, Washington’s contributions to the fund had declined from $5 million in fiscal 2015 to $500,000 in 2018. Even with declining contributions, salaries and operating expenses remained constant at over $750,000 per year. By fiscal 2018, grants to Native American communities had dwindled to barely 7 percent of the charity’s initial grants, and by fiscal 2019, that number had zeroed out entirely. Go woke, go broke HAHAHA You made my point,thanks. No sense backing an entity that fights you is there?
June 3, 20241 yr Author 2 hours ago, joemas6 said: As Col. Jessip said..." what are you gonna ask me now, my favorite color" It's not green,we know that is out HAHAHAHA
June 3, 20241 yr Author 1 hour ago, joemas6 said: Sad news with Larry Allen , he was an absolute beast on the field. At my age alot of my "stars" are going away. Friends are "disappearing" also. You'll get there
June 3, 20241 yr 21 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Yet those "offended and oppressed real Americans" want the name BACK to Redskins. It was a sign of respect(which you fail to grasp). Just like many team names. The packers-respect for those that work that industry. ND Fighting Irish-respect for the struggle of the Irish(who were actually the first SLAVES) NE Patriots-respect for Patriotic Americans(originally the BOSTON Patriots so if I am from the south should I be offended???). Some teams are named to show strength such as the RAIDERS or strong animals in nature(Panthers,Lions,Eagles, Bears, Dolphins etc) And this is just the NFL. Anyway back to football. I will call them the WUSS(because they caved to left wing pressure) until they change back. If they never do,they will remain the WUSS in my terminology because it's MY terminology and you have no say in that. Sell the team to the real indians and let them name then whatever they want,but as you see MOST want it changed back,so argue with the indians Your history knowledge really is struggling if you believe the Irish were actually the first slaves. Not even close. So gullible that you just go along with such low hanging fruit of these super rich owners throwing money at struggling poor people.
June 3, 20241 yr 38 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Point taken,however whatever decisions are made are the owners not WOKE fans who tell the team what they HAVE to do. Maybe I play this game and tell the NFL "never again until they drop the green ban" This is our team,green is our color and I don't need international approval to wear green on an AMERICAN sports team. I expect to stand for the Brazillian anthem even if they don't play the US anthem. It's about respect,not being told how we operate our team. Those are Luries calls to make,but banning a color is beyond immature as 2 nations in a "business contract". if this was not stipulated in said contract both teams should refuse to play and play in a more "color friendly" venue. I imagine since green is banned the field will be blue? Or red? or brown? pink? Maybe this seems trivial to you,that's fine,but somewhere,sometime someday someone needs to stand against the virtual crybabies. The 1 or 2% that force garbage on everyone else. And so I will stand,alone if need be. I'm used to and ok with that Oh, I was referring to Washington about the name ... the Eagles and Packers are wearing green, they are the players on the field, just like their rivals who wear those colors as players. They can't dictate the colors of the players ....lol.
June 3, 20241 yr 26 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: At my age alot of my "stars" are going away. Friends are "disappearing" also. You'll get there Allen is pretty much my age
June 3, 20241 yr 20 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Go woke, go broke HAHAHA You made my point,thanks. No sense backing an entity that fights you is there? 28 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: It's not green,we know that is out HAHAHAHA You can’t handle the truth.
June 3, 20241 yr 10 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Your history knowledge really is struggling if you believe the Irish were actually the first slaves. Not even close. So gullible that you just go along with such low hanging fruit of these super rich owners throwing money at struggling poor people. I'm going with the Israelites as my guess, but I'm sure there were prior groups.
June 3, 20241 yr How ahead of our tampering punishment was Rosie here? We were gifted not getting handed the punishment this draft(most likely thanks to the clout of the Falcons owner). He added an extra 3rd,4th and 5th for 2025.
June 3, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, joemas6 said: I'm going with the Israelites as my guess, but I'm sure there were prior groups. Keep going back…but much better answer than the Irish as the first slaves.
June 3, 20241 yr https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_slaves_myth#:~:text=The Irish slaves myth is,forebears of the African diaspora.
June 3, 20241 yr We signed Max Scharping interior Oline guy drafted by Texans then picked up by Bengals.
June 3, 20241 yr Well you guys haven’t seen us run all the extra gassers out there yet, have you? I’m still getting back at him for all those trips I took to Houston and had to come back and tell the head coach I struck out." -- Eagles QB coach Nussmeier on failure to recruit Jalen Hurts to UF
June 3, 20241 yr https://www.si.com/nfl/eagles/news/jeff-stoutland-likes-second-year-o-lineman-at-rg-until-somebody-surfaces-01hzfvzr14ys
June 3, 20241 yr Stout compares all G to Brandon Brooks. That’s his ideal G. He thinks Steen has plenty of Brooks qualities. Thought he played high last season. Really working adding muscle and playing lower this year. Stout isn’t a fan of competition so much. Wants to have those five guys working together as much as possible. …rather than rotating players in for competition.
June 4, 20241 yr New defensive backs coach Christian Parker dropped the illusion of complexity line when taking about Vic Fangio’s defensive scheme, a nod toward making things look similar pre-snap before spinning off into a host of coverage looks post snap.
June 4, 20241 yr New defensive line coach Clint Hurtt spoke to reporters for the first time since joining the Eagles staff, and when asked about Davis, named conditioning as their top focus for the third-year player this offseason. Pretty pathetic really when talking about such a high pick. Year three…we just finally want him to get in shape…geez.
June 4, 20241 yr Davis will probably get properly motivated next offseason when he’s in his contract year.
June 4, 20241 yr Author 3 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: Your history knowledge really is struggling if you believe the Irish were actually the first slaves. Not even close. So gullible that you just go along with such low hanging fruit of these super rich owners throwing money at struggling poor people. OK they were indentured servants,otherwise I am correct,they were the first. If you don't believe that YOU go back to history class. Indentured 4-9 years in the US. Mostly bad apples the UK dumped
Create an account or sign in to comment