1 minute ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

then point to where the report says that or STFU.

Gladly,

Just The News

FBI Bombshell: 274 agents sent to Capitol for J6, many la...

Hidden for four years, an after-action report on FBI's involvement in Jan. 6 riot found by Director Patel shows dozens of agents feared that the FBI had become "woke" and "liberally biased."

@JohnSnowsHair

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2025-09/FBI-HJC119-J6IG-000001-000050.pdf

Since you may just discard the link without scrolling down to the document

And for your pleasure I had Grok find the parts for you

Key Sections Discussing Agent Deployment and PresenceThe report focuses on operational challenges, anonymous agent feedback, and after-action lessons learned. Here are the most relevant excerpts related to agents being deployed, embedded, or present at the Capitol (paraphrased for brevity, with verbatim quotes where key; page numbers are from the document's internal Bates numbering, e.g., FBI-HJC119-J6IG-000007):

• Page 000007 (Radio Log Excerpts, January 6, 2021): Details real-time deployment of FBI SWAT operators to the Capitol. Verbatim: "SWAT departed WFO for Capitol... 15x en route, 6x on standby at WFO." Later: "All operators (15x) entering Capitol to assist down officer and make linkup with CIRG." By 3:36 PM: "15x WFO operators in Capitol Rotunda; linked up with USSS; no specific tasking." Roles: Tactical support, holding positions in the Rotunda and nearby buildings. Numbers: 21 total SWAT (15 entered Capitol).

• Page 000015 (Anonymous Comment #1, Point 2): Describes plainclothes/special agents deployed to streets around the Capitol without clear guidance. Verbatim: "Agents were again deployed onto the streets (specifically around the Capitol) and simply told to stand behind MPD. No other direction... FBI agents do not have training for, nor equipment for, riot control." Roles: Support to Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) in crowd control. Numbers: Not specified (implies squads of agents).

• Page 000016 (Anonymous Comment #2, Point 3): Agents positioned on the Capitol grounds. Verbatim: "I took my squad down to the West lawn of the Capitol where we linked up with [two other squads], stood behind MPD as they cleared out protestors." Roles: Flanking police lines, assisting in clearing protesters. Numbers: At least three squads.

• Page 000019 (Unedited Agent Responses): Multiple complaints about unclear missions for agents in crowd situations. Verbatim: "We were again put out on 1/6 with no clear mission, into a crowd control situation without appropriate gear or training... We were told we were not to be on the front line, but to be behind the police in a ‘support’ role. However, we were then deployed on the flank of the police line with direct contact with the protesters." Roles: Support in crowd/riot control, intelligence gathering. Numbers: Not specified (references multiple squads/agents).

• Page 000021 (Recommendations on Intel Teams): Explicitly mentions plainclothes agents embedded for intel. Verbatim: "Intel teams, where we are in plain clothes, gathering useful intel for MPD/USPP, etc. This is a proven model... agents would ID trouble makers and MPD would respond to remove them." Roles: Embedded intelligence collection among crowds. Numbers: Not specified.

• Page 000028 (Roles During Civil Disturbance): Discusses ambiguity in agent roles at the Capitol. Verbatim: "In the case of the civil disturbance and the Capitol Incursion there was some ambiguity as far as initial roles... Agents may respond to a scene as investigators but may need to immediately transition into an active first responder role." Roles: Hybrid investigative/first responder support. Numbers: Not specified.

• Page 000030–000031 (Deployment Logistics for NVRA Personnel): Covers mandatory reporting and briefings for agents heading to the Capitol. Verbatim: "Mandatory assignment of all participating SAs to WFO - At the outset of the Capitol response, all SAs were told to report solely to WFO... Recommend having ASAC and/or SSA conduct a floor or squad level pre-mission brief... prior to the agents driving into the Capitol." Roles: Initial response and staging for Capitol entry. Numbers: "All participating SAs" (no total given).

Other pages (e.g., 000025, 000027, 000032) touch on embedding supervisory special agents (SSAs) in coordination teams or communication issues during deployments, but without specific numbers or direct "embedded" language tied to the crowds.

Comms check begin @ 2:16pm. They were not embedded, they were responding. Got that from your doc DH

1 minute ago, DiPros said:

Comms check begin @ 2:16pm. They were not embedded, they were responding. Got that from your doc DH

Wrong

(FBI-HJC119-J6IG-000001–000050):

• Page 000021 (Recommendations on Intel Teams): Verbatim: "Intel teams, where we are in plain clothes, gathering useful intel for MPD/USPP, etc. This is a proven model... agents would ID trouble makers and MPD would respond to remove them."

  • Context: Describes plainclothes agents embedded among crowds for intelligence collection, coordinating with Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and U.S. Park Police (USPP).

  • Roles: Identifying potential threats or "trouble makers" within the crowd.

  • Numbers: Not specified in the document.

50 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

They knocked it down by 1 😂? Also what American says rubbish? Are you an expat?

Macaulay Caulkin literally says it in Home Alone, you F'ing reetard.

See the word embedded?

To back up MPD with no other instruction. Just what is the conspiracy here?

Just now, DiPros said:

See the word embedded?

To back up MPD with no other instruction. Just what is the conspiracy here?

Deployed in plain clothes means embedded 😂

rubbish is the new hogwarsh

5 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Deployed in plain clothes means embedded 😂

30 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

@JohnSnowsHair

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2025-09/FBI-HJC119-J6IG-000001-000050.pdf

Since you may just discard the link without scrolling down to the document

And for your pleasure I had Grok find the parts for you

Key Sections Discussing Agent Deployment and PresenceThe report focuses on operational challenges, anonymous agent feedback, and after-action lessons learned. Here are the most relevant excerpts related to agents being deployed, embedded, or present at the Capitol (paraphrased for brevity, with verbatim quotes where key; page numbers are from the document's internal Bates numbering, e.g., FBI-HJC119-J6IG-000007):

• Page 000007 (Radio Log Excerpts, January 6, 2021): Details real-time deployment of FBI SWAT operators to the Capitol. Verbatim: "SWAT departed WFO for Capitol... 15x en route, 6x on standby at WFO." Later: "All operators (15x) entering Capitol to assist down officer and make linkup with CIRG." By 3:36 PM: "15x WFO operators in Capitol Rotunda; linked up with USSS; no specific tasking." Roles: Tactical support, holding positions in the Rotunda and nearby buildings. Numbers: 21 total SWAT (15 entered Capitol).

• Page 000015 (Anonymous Comment #1, Point 2): Describes plainclothes/special agents deployed to streets around the Capitol without clear guidance. Verbatim: "Agents were again deployed onto the streets (specifically around the Capitol) and simply told to stand behind MPD. No other direction... FBI agents do not have training for, nor equipment for, riot control." Roles: Support to Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) in crowd control. Numbers: Not specified (implies squads of agents).

• Page 000016 (Anonymous Comment #2, Point 3): Agents positioned on the Capitol grounds. Verbatim: "I took my squad down to the West lawn of the Capitol where we linked up with [two other squads], stood behind MPD as they cleared out protestors." Roles: Flanking police lines, assisting in clearing protesters. Numbers: At least three squads.

• Page 000019 (Unedited Agent Responses): Multiple complaints about unclear missions for agents in crowd situations. Verbatim: "We were again put out on 1/6 with no clear mission, into a crowd control situation without appropriate gear or training... We were told we were not to be on the front line, but to be behind the police in a ‘support’ role. However, we were then deployed on the flank of the police line with direct contact with the protesters." Roles: Support in crowd/riot control, intelligence gathering. Numbers: Not specified (references multiple squads/agents).

• Page 000021 (Recommendations on Intel Teams): Explicitly mentions plainclothes agents embedded for intel. Verbatim: "Intel teams, where we are in plain clothes, gathering useful intel for MPD/USPP, etc. This is a proven model... agents would ID trouble makers and MPD would respond to remove them." Roles: Embedded intelligence collection among crowds. Numbers: Not specified.

• Page 000028 (Roles During Civil Disturbance): Discusses ambiguity in agent roles at the Capitol. Verbatim: "In the case of the civil disturbance and the Capitol Incursion there was some ambiguity as far as initial roles... Agents may respond to a scene as investigators but may need to immediately transition into an active first responder role." Roles: Hybrid investigative/first responder support. Numbers: Not specified.

• Page 000030–000031 (Deployment Logistics for NVRA Personnel): Covers mandatory reporting and briefings for agents heading to the Capitol. Verbatim: "Mandatory assignment of all participating SAs to WFO - At the outset of the Capitol response, all SAs were told to report solely to WFO... Recommend having ASAC and/or SSA conduct a floor or squad level pre-mission brief... prior to the agents driving into the Capitol." Roles: Initial response and staging for Capitol entry. Numbers: "All participating SAs" (no total given).

Other pages (e.g., 000025, 000027, 000032) touch on embedding supervisory special agents (SSAs) in coordination teams or communication issues during deployments, but without specific numbers or direct "embedded" language tied to the crowds.

dude, none of that says they were "embedded".

and no, plain clothes does not mean "embedded".

specifically, whatever "grok" pulled out here:

"details real time deployment of FBI SWAT" ... uh, yeah, FBI SWAT teams responding to the J6 riot. not embedded agents.

"Agents were again deployed onto the streets (specifically around the Capitol) and simply told to stand behind MPD" I already quoted this. it's about agents deployed in respond. ef'ing behind MPD. not embedded. do you know what embedded even means?

"stood behind MPD as they cleared out protestors" ... yeah, in response to the riot.

"We were again put out on 1/6 with no clear mission, into a crowd control situation without appropriate gear or training... We were told we were not to be on the front line, but to be behind the police in a ‘support’ role." .. again, in response, behind the police. the complaint here is that they weren't properly geared for the response.

you're just wrong on this. take the L. stop trolling.

21 minutes ago, Arthur Jackson said:

rubbish is the new hogwarsh

balderdash.

horsefeathers

(too soon?)

1 minute ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

dude, none of that says they were "embedded".

and no, plain clothes does not mean "embedded".

specifically, whatever "grok" pulled out here:

"details real time deployment of FBI SWAT" ... uh, yeah, FBI SWAT teams responding to the J6 riot. not embedded agents.

"Agents were again deployed onto the streets (specifically around the Capitol) and simply told to stand behind MPD" I already quoted this. it's about agents deployed in respond. ef'ing behind MPD. not embedded. do you know what embedded even means?

"stood behind MPD as they cleared out protestors" ... yeah, in response to the riot.

"We were again put out on 1/6 with no clear mission, into a crowd control situation without appropriate gear or training... We were told we were not to be on the front line, but to be behind the police in a ‘support’ role." .. again, in response, behind the police. the complaint here is that they weren't properly geared for the response.

you're just wrong on this. take the L. stop trolling.

Dude, I get it. Your world is upside down and you don't know how to cope.

1 minute ago, Arthur Jackson said:

horsefeathers

(too soon?)

only if you're into furry crossover action

Just now, Diehardfan said:

Dude, I get it. Your world is upside down and you don't know how to cope. You are deranged I get it. But saying I'm wrong doesn't change the facts that you are and you all are losing yet another talking point. But you will keep crying because it's what you all do.

this would be you.

you're in the tank dude. you drank the kool-aid and you're cooked.

Just now, JohnSnowsHair said:

this would be you.

you're in the tank dude. you drank the kool-aid and you're cooked.

The left is cooked and the DOJ is coming for them you mean.

it's going to be very funny when Comey walks and sues the administration.

in other news.

yeah, that's definitely worth doing. idiots.

4 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

it's going to be very funny when Comey walks and sues the administration.

It's going to be fun when a lot more get indited for their crimes

I don't have a lot of experience in law enforcement. @Bill how would you rate this guy's technique?

7 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:

I don't have a lot of experience in law enforcement. @Bill how would you rate this guy's technique?

Don't wear skinny jeans and make sure your mag is seated

Goon squad training at its finest! Not only did his lose the gun he also ejected the bullets LOL Can't make it up

6 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Don't wear skinny jeans and make sure your mag is seated

Pretty sure directing traffic with your gun is also frowned upon but again I'm no expert