12 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

Any interest? He has to be better than Dotson. But bizarre character issues with him refusing to go in games.

No way -- I like the locker room chemistry of this team (despite the national media narrative). He's not nearly talented enough to be worth the trouble.

1 minute ago, vikas83 said:

No way -- I like the locker room chemistry of this team (despite the national media narrative). He's not nearly talented enough to be worth the trouble.

Correct.  You don't mess with what's working, especially for a guy with that type of baggage.  We learned with T.O. that even with all the talent in the world, some guys just aren't worth the headaches.

30 minutes ago, RLC said:

Do us a solid Andrew Berry. 

22 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

Any interest? He has to be better than Dotson. But bizarre character issues with him refusing to go in games.

Another team trying to win the SB releases because he is a cancer and asking if interest. 

We really have no idea if Dotson is good, Hurts doesn't throw his way. 

lol right on cue

All this because he didn't like his playing time and lack of targets. No way do you bring that dope here where he will get even less targets and playing time. 

Makes a ton more sense now too why Pittsburgh traded him for just a 6th and the Panthers traded him just for a 6th round pickswap.

1 hour ago, EagleJoe8 said:

Kinda where I'm at. I want the 1 seed, but if not us, then I'm ok with Detroit getting it. I think they're banged up and more vulnerable, but I have no hate for the Lions, and would rather they go to the Super Bowl if we don't.

I don’t hate them either, but I will if we get the chance to play them. 

Baltimore is a top 6 Super Bowl favorite. They throw more than us AND they had no clear WR3-4 (unless you really like Agholor). 

If he's not working out there, he's not working out here. 

38 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Loser franchises, yea. Texans were in the same spot with even more on the line with the #1 pick in the balance, but they showed up. Ended out working pretty nice for them too. 

With 3 games still to play, no one should be giving up already. 

The Giants quit 3 weeks ago. 😆

37 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

Any interest? He has to be better than Dotson. But bizarre character issues with him refusing to go in games.

 None at all

7 minutes ago, RLC said:

Baltimore is a top 6 Super Bowl favorite. They throw more than us AND they had no clear WR3-4 (unless you really like Agholor). 

If he's not working out there, he's not working out here. 

And Agholor was just ruled out 

1 hour ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Loser franchises, yea. Texans were in the same spot with even more on the line with the #1 pick in the balance, but they showed up. Ended out working pretty nice for them too. 

With 3 games still to play, no one should be giving up already. 

At a minimum should be relishing the role of spoiler.  "No one clinches (or whatever) against us" mentality. 

And should be playing stress free football too.  Run some stuff. Take some reasonable chances.  Do something extra, FFS.

Maybe even a flash or some extra mustard from guys that don't get to see the field and need to impress.  

Like you said, have some damn pride, man.  

45 minutes ago, vikas83 said:

No way -- I like the locker room chemistry of this team (despite the national media narrative). He's not nearly talented enough to be worth the trouble.

I can deal with a lot of eccentric tendencies and personality traits if someone is good at their job, but an employee literally refusing to work is totally disqualifying.

OT: anyone have experience with OLED tvs? Are they worth it?

You can't spell Diontae without done.

 

3 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said:

OT: anyone have experience with OLED tvs? Are they worth it?

I got one 4-5 years ago. Just had to replace the main board a few months ago because something went bad and it kept freezing. I saw some other people on the internet complain about the same thing. It was easy enough to fix myself, just a pain to get it off, unscrew the back panel and replace the board. Also was about $350 bucks for the part. 

That was my only issue with it. I've been happy with it besides that. 

3 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said:

OT: anyone have experience with OLED tvs? Are they worth it?

I asked one of my biz partners. Owns a TV repair shop.  Used to have burn in issues.  Not anymore.  Do not buy LG though of anything, apparently. 

5 hours ago, rrfierce said:

Wouldn't surprised me if the cleat manufacturers just paid the fines for the players that are wearing their brand.

 

Still cheap advertising

 

18 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said:

OT: anyone have experience with OLED tvs? Are they worth it?

I think so…at least they were when I got mine 3 years ago.  Unparalleled black level imo.  But where the TV is going to be in the home matters.  Mine is in my basement…not a lot of external light coming in.  I got an 83 inch Sony OLED where we watch all of our movies… And it’s where I watch the Eagles games.  

If it’s going to go in a family room where there’s a lot of windows…no need to go OLED there imo.  Unless things have changed significantly recently, the non-OLED TVs are better in brighter rooms.
 

17 minutes ago, Iggles25 said:

You can't spell Diontae without done.

 

Dude lost so much coin… such an idiot

22 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said:

OT: anyone have experience with OLED tvs? Are they worth it?

I have some Sony OLEDs — the picture is fantastic, but I’m not someone who can speak on the details.

9 minutes ago, McMVP said:

I think so…at least they were when I got mine 3 years ago.  Unparalleled black level imo.  But where the TV is going to be in the home matters.  Mine is in my basement…not a lot of external light coming in.  I got an 83 inch Sony OLED where we watch all of our movies… And it’s where I watch the Eagles games.  

If it’s going to go in a family room where there’s a lot of windows…no need to go OLED there imo.  Unless things have changed significantly recently, the non-OLED TVs are better in brighter rooms.
 

This is helpful thx

its a main room probably a 65

i have a 110” projector screen in the basement 😁

5 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said:

This is helpful thx

its a main room probably a 65

i have a 110” projector screen in the basement 😁

110”…I’m jealous lol.  I do have a pretty monster wall mount that allows me to pull it out a bit and turn the 83 into closer to a 90” based on where I’m sitting.  And the OLED picture is effing amazing.  Coupled with the surround sound we have set up… It’s awesome for movies and football games.

But yeah, if it’s going into a more lighted room, no need to spend more.  I have the same ‘Bravia’ Sony TV up in our bedroom…a 65”… but it’s a much lighter room with a lot of windows, and not OLED.  I think it’s their QLED version (not sure what they are calling them now) and far cheaper

42 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said:

OT: anyone have experience with OLED tvs? Are they worth it?

Good site for reviews 

https://www.rtings.com/

1 hour ago, vikas83 said:

No way -- I like the locker room chemistry of this team (despite the national media narrative). He's not nearly talented enough to be worth the trouble.

 

1 hour ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Correct.  You don't mess with what's working, especially for a guy with that type of baggage.  We learned with T.O. that even with all the talent in the world, some guys just aren't worth the headaches.

Plus, he likely doesn’t have a role here anyway. I don’t think Dotson is bad when used, but he’s used so little. And WR4 and beyond? Forget it. Not worth the headache in the locker room or trying to figure out a role for him.