Just now, Mike030270 said:

Still can't

Ok, thank you.  Then it is likely a bug with the new upgrade and I'll have to look at the following versions release notes.

9 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

Here's my counter proposal based on latitude:

Seahawks, Vikings, Packers, Bills

Lions, Patriots, Bears, Browns

Jets, Giants, Pittsburgh, Eagles

Colts, Broncos, Ravens, Bengals

Chiefs, Commanders, 49ers, Titans

Vegas, Panthers, Rams, Chargers

Falcons, Cardinals, Cowboys, Jags

Saints, Texans, Bucs, Dophins

 

 

What if we just make division to MAXIMIZE travel with in divisions?  That way each game has as much spread over the country as possible rather than such a limited scope?   

For example:

Patriots, Cowboys, Vikings and Raiders
Ravens, Bucs, Texans, Bears
Chiefs, Lions, Seahawks, Titans
Bills, Saints, Packers, Bengals
Giants, Falcons, Chargers, Broncos
Eagles, 49ers, Colts, Browns
Steelers, Panthers, Rams, Dolphins
Cardinals, Jets, Jaguars, Commanders

26 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

Here's my counter proposal based on latitude:

Seahawks, Vikings, Packers, Bills

Lions, Patriots, Bears, Browns

Jets, Giants, Pittsburgh, Eagles

Colts, Broncos, Ravens, Bengals

Chiefs, Commanders, 49ers, Titans

Vegas, Panthers, Rams, Chargers

Falcons, Cardinals, Cowboys, Jags

Saints, Texans, Bucs, Dolphins

Here’s a map to go with that

18 minutes ago, Moderator12 said:

Do me a favor.  Try it now.

There may be some latency associated with the old post, so you may want to try it on a new post.

24 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

I did one in alphabetical order.

Bears, Bengals, Bills, Broncos

Browns, Bucs, Cardinals, Chargers

Chiefs, Colts, Commanders, Cowboys

Dolphins, Eagles, Falcons, 49ers

Giants, Jags, Jets, Lions

Packers, Panthers, Patriots, Raiders

Rams, Ravens, Saints, Seahawks

Steelers, Texans, Titans, Vikings

 

Numbers always come before letters, so 49ers move to the front

49ers, Bears, Bengals, Bills

Broncos, Browns, Bucs, Cardinals

Chargers, Chiefs, Colts, Commanders

Cowboys, Dolphins, Eagles, Falcons

Giants, Jags, Jets, Lions

Packers, Panthers, Patriots, Raiders

Rams, Ravens, Saints, Seahawks

Steelers, Texans, Titans, Vikings

 

 

3 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

What if we just make division to MAXIMIZE travel with in divisions?  That way each game has as much spread over the country as possible rather than such a limited scope?   

For example:

Patriots, Cowboys, Vikings and Raiders
Ravens, Bucs, Texans, Bears
Chiefs, Lions, Seahawks, Titans
Bills, Saints, Packers, Bengals
Giants, Falcons, Chargers, Broncos
Eagles, 49ers, Colts, Browns
Steelers, Panthers, Rams, Dolphins
Cardinals, Jets, Jaguars, Commanders

Why not by themes?

 

Patriots, Texans, Eagles, Commanders - 'Merica Division

Falcons, Cardinals, Seahawks, Ravens - Avian Division

Vikings, Raiders, Buccaneers, Dolphins - Seafaring Division

Panthers, Lions, Bengals, Jaguars - Feline Division

Chiefs, Cowboys, Steelers, Packers - Occupation Division

Broncos, Bears, Rams, Colts - Quadraped Division

Giants, Titans, Saints, Chargers - Mythical Division (Chargers as an abstract addition here)

Browns, Bills, Jets, 49ers - People Division (Browns and Bills named after real people, 49ers a group of people [could have gone in Occupation as well] and Jets carry people)

 

If James Pearce doesn't visit the Eagles, think he can be ruled out? We don't know how valid the character concerns are, but if they're legit, you'd think he'd be a guy a team would want to meet with and visit with to see what he's all about.

2 hours ago, mattwill said:

There may be some latency associated with the old post, so you may want to try it on a new post.

Testing @Moderator12

Edit: It worked on this one

Edit: I still can't edit the other one but I can still keep editing this one

18 minutes ago, twistr said:

Why not by themes?

 

Patriots, Texans, Eagles, Commanders - 'Merica Division

Falcons, Cardinals, Seahawks, Ravens - Avian Division

Vikings, Raiders, Buccaneers, Dolphins - Seafaring Division

Panthers, Lions, Bengals, Jaguars - Feline Division

Chiefs, Cowboys, Steelers, Packers - Occupation Division

Broncos, Bears, Rams, Colts - Quadraped Division

Giants, Titans, Saints, Chargers - Mythical Division (Chargers as an abstract addition here)

Browns, Bills, Jets, 49ers - People Division (Browns and Bills named after real people, 49ers a group of people [could have gone in Occupation as well] and Jets carry people)

 

I'm loving this one.   It makes the most sense of anything I've seen.

26 minutes ago, twistr said:

Why not by themes?

 

Patriots, Texans, Eagles, Commanders - 'Merica Division

Falcons, Cardinals, Seahawks, Ravens - Avian Division

Vikings, Raiders, Buccaneers, Dolphins - Seafaring Division

Panthers, Lions, Bengals, Jaguars - Feline Division

Chiefs, Cowboys, Steelers, Packers - Occupation Division

Broncos, Bears, Rams, Colts - Quadraped Division

Giants, Titans, Saints, Chargers - Mythical Division (Chargers as an abstract addition here)

Browns, Bills, Jets, 49ers - People Division (Browns and Bills named after real people, 49ers a group of people [could have gone in Occupation as well] and Jets carry people)

 

 

7 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

I'm loving this one.   It makes the most sense of anything I've seen.

My favorite is the quadraped division  

1 hour ago, EagleJoe8 said:

Hate the idea of playing on the MetLife turf twice a year. 

I never said my proposal was good.  

Peeking at mock drafts across the Internet today, I am seeing alot of Nolen @ 32.

Would be thrilled with the pick, but have a sneaky suspicion he goes somewhere in the 20s. Hope I am wrong.

CBS had Revel falling to the Eagles. Solid pick and competition for Ringo at CB2.  Provides good depth there after losing Slay and Rodgers in FA. BPA wins championships.

I've seen Jihaad Campbell fall in more recent mocks. Seems unlikely we grab an LB at 32 but it would be hard to say he's not the BPA there in all likelihood of he really does fall that far. 

18 minutes ago, Iggles25 said:

Peeking at mock drafts across the Internet today, I am seeing alot of Nolen @ 32.

Would be thrilled with the pick, but have a sneaky suspicion he goes somewhere in the 20s. Hope I am wrong.

CBS had Revel falling to the Eagles. Solid pick and competition for Ringo at CB2.  Provides good depth there after losing Slay and Rodgers in FA. BPA wins championships.

I like Revel a lot, but I don't see it at 32 given our recent investments.  Now in a trade down from 32 and/or trade up from 64 scenario...still a high price but that would be hard to argue with.

25 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

I never said my proposal was good.  

But look at all the new ideas that it spurred on!   

32 minutes ago, mikemack8 said:

 

My favorite is the quadraped division  

The greatest irony is that the 'seafaring' division has two teams that are in landlocked cities!   

59 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

Testing @Moderator12

Edit: It worked on this one

Edit: I still can't edit the other one but I can keep editing this one

Try clearing your cache and then attempt to edit the old one.

24 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:

I like Revel a lot, but I don't see it at 32 given our recent investments.  Now in a trade down from 32 and/or trade up from 64 scenario...still a high price but that would be hard to argue with.

Pretty much. I also don’t like the injury. It’s another risk/unknown to deal with. At 64 or a small trade up, I like the risk reward. But in the 32 to 50 range I’m not a fan.

32 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:

I've seen Jihaad Campbell fall in more recent mocks. Seems unlikely we grab an LB at 32 but it would be hard to say he's not the BPA there in all likelihood of he really does fall that far. 

The good thing about Campbell is he projects well as a pass rusher. You can project him as a guy who plays off ball or as a Fangio edge who can drop into coverage, a la Andrew Van Ginkel or Jalynx Hunt but with more pass rusher upside than Ginkel and a higher floor than Hunt.

 

Would take a chance on Thibs for a 2026 3rd. Heck a 2026 4th might get it done if they want to move him if they draft Carter.

I think a change of scenery might serve him well.

Coaching and playing for a contender might be the cure for what ails him.

2 hours ago, Mike030270 said:

Testing @Moderator12

Edit: It worked on this one

Edit: I still can't edit the other one but I can still keep editing this one

That actually confuses things.  The change I made was removing an experimental time limit (of 10 years) back to unlimited.  That change should be universal, not a point in time.  I'm wondering if it has something to do with the content.  I.E. Multiple quotes, embedded tweet, etc.  

 

I'll test it later and not clog up the blog with debugging  

11 minutes ago, Moderator12 said:

That actually confuses things.  The change I made was removing an experimental time limit (of 10 years) back to unlimited.  That change should be universal, not a point in time.  I'm wondering if it has something to do with the content.  I.E. Multiple quotes, embedded tweet, etc.  

 

I'll test it later and not clog up the blog with debugging  

CLOG THE BLOG! CLOG THE BLOG!

13 minutes ago, twistr said:

CLOG THE BLOG! CLOG THE BLOG!