I dusted off my AOL instant messenger account and asked SmarterChild about all this. He said that Trump Fed kids. 🤷🏻

7 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:

"There are a lot of connections here but nothing has been proven in court yet" isn't really the mic-drop you think it is friendo.

He was friends with him so duh there are some connections.

1 minute ago, Diehardfan said:

Bottom Line

If someone is claiming:

"Trump has been proven in court to be involved in Epstein’s trafficking operation.”

That is false.

First of all, holy sheet TL/DR

Second of all, the bottom line here, no sheet. He’s never been tried for any of this. Neither has anyone else aside from Maxwell. Seems like you’re trying to claim no one in the Epstein files raped kids since it hasn’t been proven in court.

8 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

First of all, holy sheet TL/DR

Second of all, the bottom line here, no sheet. He’s never been tried for any of this. Neither has anyone else aside from Maxwell. Seems like you’re trying to claim no one in the Epstein files raped kids since it hasn’t been proven in court.

You like jumping to false conclusions. Not even close. Of course kids were hurt and they should pay. The guy associated with him, banned him from his club, and then dimed him out to the Palm Beach chief in 2006. Not something guilty people do before it becomes a thing.

Look at Steven A saying the same crap I said today. If they had anything they would have used it on him. They have nothing.

And with that I'm done.

7 hours ago, jsdarkstar said:

What nobody wants to acknowledge: She was one of the women Epstein trafficked.

Did Republicans torpedo their own hearing?

3 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

Look at Steven A saying the same crap I said today. If they had anything they would have used it on him. They have nothing.

And with that I'm done.

Here is an answer you can understand. They didn’t release the files under Biden because that would have exposed all the important Dems and Dem supporters. By protecting those people they also protected Trump by inclusion. They also thought they would beat Trump in ‘24. They risked it and they lost. Understand? That is the simplest reason which we all know is usually the right one.

12 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Here is an answer you can understand. They didn’t release the files under Biden because that would have exposed all the important Dems and Dem supporters. By protecting those people they also protected Trump by inclusion. They also thought they would beat Trump in ‘24. They risked it and they lost. Understand? That is the simplest reason which we all know is usually the right one.

And the reason Trump was guilty and dimed him out to the Palm Beach chief in 06 saying you need to stop him before this was on anyone's radar? A guy who may run as a Dem for POTUS in 3 years who doesn't have TDS says it sounds like BS from the Dems. Sometimes the simplest reason is the right one.

Thanks to Trump who started this rolling 

48 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

And the reason Trump was guilty and dimed him out to the Palm Beach chief in 06 saying you need to stop him before this was on anyone's radar? A guy who may run as a Dem for POTUS in 3 years who doesn't have TDS says it sounds like BS from the Dems. Sometimes the simplest reason is the right one.

There is a LOT of noise and detail. Trump could have reached out to the Palm Beach chief for any number of reasons. Doing so in no way proves any innocence for Trump.

4 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

Look at Steven A saying the same crap I said today. If they had anything they would have used it on him. They have nothing.

And with that I'm done.

Stephen a smith said that?

37 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Thanks to Trump who started this rolling

Trump is the one who tried everything he could to prevent any of the data from coming out. Who is he protecting? Is it Bannon? Nutlick? Himself?

7 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

Not something guilty people do before it becomes a thing.

Yeah totally, guilty people have never tried to shift the focus of an investigation onto other guilty people in an attempt to escape scrutiny. That's definitely never happened before!

Imagine thinking being on the same page as Stephen A Smith is a win. You all really are getting desperate if you're turning to that idiot.

2 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

And the reason Trump was guilty and dimed him out to the Palm Beach chief in 06 saying you need to stop him before this was on anyone's radar?

It wasn't before it was on anyone's radar. The link you posted earlier even says it was after Epstein's crimes became public. Trump was trying desperately to cover his own a**, which may be a pattern here if you're paying attention.

A guy who may run as a Dem for POTUS in 3 years who doesn't have TDS says it sounds like BS from the Dems.

Holy sheet, it's Stephen A Smith dude

Sometimes the simplest reason is the right one.

Our explanation is that a close friend (best friend according to Epstein) of the world's most notorious sex trafficker, who partied with him all the time and who himself is a proven-in-court sex offender, took part in Epstein's sex crimes at least a time or two over the course of their decades-long friendship. That's not in any way a complicated explanation. It's where anyone would land here if they were looking at the situation honestly. And it's the explanation you yourself would land on if you weren't in a cult that worships him.

Just now, VanHammersly said:

Holy sheet, it's Stephen A Smith dude

Yeah, so? It's not like Skip Bayless said it. That dude sucks!

1 hour ago, DrPhilly said:

Trump is the one who tried everything he could to prevent any of the data from coming out. Who is he protecting? Is it Bannon? Nutlick? Himself?

Would any of it be out if not for him? Nope.

Just now, Diehardfan said:

Would any of it be out if not for him? Nope.

Congress had to pass legislation to force him to do it. Thank Massie and Khanna.

1 hour ago, DrPhilly said:

There is a LOT of noise and detail. Trump could have reached out to the Palm Beach chief for any number of reasons. Doing so in no way proves any innocence for Trump.

Of course it has to be negative reasons, right?

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-told-police-chief-everyone-knew-about-epstein-fbi-document-says-2026-02-10/

This is 2006 before anything started

2 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

Congress had to pass legislation to force him to do it. Thank Massie and Khanna.

And who started it during the campaign. Trump. You are welcome

Just now, Diehardfan said:

And who started it during the campaign. Trump. You are welcome

If that was an honest campaign promise and not just something he wanted to just use as political fodder and then drop the second he got in office, then why did it take an act of Congress to force him to do it? He could've done it well before it came to that.

1 minute ago, VanHammersly said:

If that was an honest campaign promise and not just something he wanted to just use as political fodder and then drop the second he got in office, then why did it take an act of Congress to force him to do it? He could've done it well before it came to that.

And why did they do that? Because of his campaign. Again you are welcome.

1 hour ago, DEagle7 said:

Imagine thinking being on the same page as Stephen A Smith is a win. You all really are getting desperate if you're turning to that idiot.

He will be on the Dem debate stage in 3 years.