18 hours ago, mayanh8 said:

@Mike31mt I'm going to attempt to explain to you why your newfound whataboutism is totally ineffective here...

The whataboutism only works if you don't make your entire campaign and political philosophy about how the Democrats, Hollywood, and Jews are running a pedophile cabal.

Whataboutism is predecated upon both sides being equally at fault. The problem that you don't quite seem to be able to wrap your head around, and can't figure out why everyone is dancing on MAGA right now, is that your typical Democrat voter has always known the Epstein list like has the names of Clinton and Trump on it. We want them all in jail. But we also know it will never happen. Our red line is not voting for pedophiles or pedophile advocates.

But when MAGA attempts to elevate itself above the issue and lay all the pedo conspiracies at the feet of Democrats then you look foolish later for trying to claim whataboutism because you've now done a complete 180. It proves you never cared about the issue in the first place. It proves you only stand for whatever Trump tells you to stand for and have no original thought or principled take on anything.

This is a monumental pile of word salad nonsense. Sorry, you're failing to explain away how you are holding Trump to a higher standard than anyone in the DNC, just because he actually talked about and went about bringing Epstein to justice.

By your logic, if Trump wouldn't have ever mentioned Epstein then you'd be totally fine with him ignoring it altogether like the Dems did.

You're all so full of ish and transparently so.

If your red line was not voting for pedophiles, why'd you vote for the guy who showered with his own underage daughter, and then completely ignored the entire case for 4 years?

Do liberals even know what red lines mean??

1 minute ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

The Dems allowed child sex trafficking to explode and that is an inarguable, rock solid fact.

You voted for that

Imagine comparing showering with your kid to being best friends with the world's most infamous sex trafficker, murdering him, burning his client list and then altering the tape of his murder

48 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

The Dems allowed child sex trafficking to explode and that is an inarguable, rock solid fact.

You voted for that

1- deflection again. still not man enough to admit trump is involved.

2- no i didnt vote for that. try again, cletus.

the only fact here is you have still refused to condemn the obvious cover up by trump even though he's covering up for dems too. you're acting like the vatican at this point.

1 hour ago, Mike31mt said:

The Dems allowed child sex trafficking to explode and that is an inarguable, rock solid fact.

You voted for that

38 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

1- deflection again. still not man enough to admit trump is involved.

2- no i didnt vote for that. try again, cletus.

the only fact here is you have still refused to condemn the obvious cover up by trump even though he's covering up for dems too. you're acting like the vatican at this point.

Trump isn't involved, you nitwit.

"Obvious coverup" lol

Wow, that's bad. He got people fired up about it while running and now is saying that....I'm glad he won and support his other ideas but he is wrong on that.

3 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

Trump isn't involved, you nitwit.

"Obvious coverup" lol

You have to be a total moron to not know that Trump is involved. The evidence is all over the place. They were best friends for 15 years and there is a MOUNTAIN of material linking them together.

You are either a complete idiot or a cult worshiper (or both). Take your pick.

1 hour ago, Mike31mt said:

This is a monumental pile of word salad nonsense. Sorry, you're failing to explain away how you are holding Trump to a higher standard than anyone in the DNC, just because he actually talked about and went about bringing Epstein to justice.

By your logic, if Trump wouldn't have ever mentioned Epstein then you'd be totally fine with him ignoring it altogether like the Dems did.

You're all so full of ish and transparently so.

If your red line was not voting for pedophiles, why'd you vote for the guy who showered with his own underage daughter, and then completely ignored the entire case for 4 years?

Do liberals even know what red lines mean??

It was probably lost in the whataboutism and I missed it but did you ever say whether the Epstein files should be released?

If yes then how do you feel about all repubs but 1 voting yes to blocking the release?

Gonna say my peace then bounce.

Let’s play a political Party word association game. Tell me which political party affiliation comes to mind when you read these words:

Pizzagate

Cabal

Qanon

Adrenochrome

MAGA was largely formed off the basis of breaking up elitist child sex traffic rings and Trump was going to bring them all to justice! Conveniently the island culprits were anyone who spoke out against Trump despite the fact Trump and Epstein were well documented best buds. Maga used child sex rings as a political tool. Low hanging fruit for their despicable easily manipulative base (the left is despicable too but at the very least they didn’t formulate a political movement about imaginary child sex rings to manipulate voters). Thats the difference

30 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

This is a monumental pile of word salad nonsense. Sorry, you're failing to explain away how you are holding Trump to a higher standard than anyone in the DNC, just because he actually talked about and went about bringing Epstein to justice.

By your logic, if Trump wouldn't have ever mentioned Epstein then you'd be totally fine with him ignoring it altogether like the Dems did.

You're all so full of ish and transparently so.

If your red line was not voting for pedophiles, why'd you vote for the guy who showered with his own underage daughter, and then completely ignored the entire case for 4 years?

Do liberals even know what red lines mean??

The issue here, Mike, is you’re the only one trying to defend a pedo. EVERYONE else is saying yes if anyone on the left is on the list they should be held accountable. Your stance is why didn’t the democrats do anything about it. I have no idea and that has zero relevance. If Bill Clinton is on the client list (probably) he should be thrown into the pedo wood chipper.

What we can say for certain is Trump IS on the client list. Trump said he’d declassify the list (but less so 🤣), bondi said it was on her desk…then suddenly 😲 it didn’t exist, but now does but it was created by Comey/Biden/Obama but they never actually released it for some reason. (You really can’t make this crap up)

Yes or no million dollar question: when the list comes out and trumps all over it will you finally be brave enough to admit he’s a despicable piece of crap?

Please also keep all this in mind:

• In 2016, Lisa Bloom, a well-known attorney, briefly represented "Jane Doe.”

• A press conference was scheduled for Jane Doe to speak publicly in November 2016, just before the presidential election.

• However, it was canceled last minute, with Bloom stating the woman had received multiple threats and was fearful for her safety.

• Jane Doe ultimately dropped the lawsuit shortly afterward.

2 minutes ago, Nice Work Pal said:

Gonna say my peace then bounce.

You should chime in more often

18 hours ago, mr_hunt said:

our president raped underage girls…gross.

He's got my vote. I support rapists, sex predators and pedophiles. Those are the best qualifications to be President after being a convicted felon.

It's pretty clear Trump is involved way deep - that shouldn't suprise anyone with half a brain.

What is not clear is why the list has been covered up by at least three administrations now. I think the names of those involved go deep onto both benches.

11 minutes ago, sameaglesfan said:

It's pretty clear Trump is involved way deep - that shouldn't suprise anyone with half a brain.

What is not clear is why the list has been covered up by at least three administrations now. I think the names of those involved go deep onto both benches.

This is no doubt exactly what is going on

10 minutes ago, sameaglesfan said:

It's pretty clear Trump is involved way deep - that shouldn't suprise anyone with half a brain.

What is not clear is why the list has been covered up by at least three administrations now. I think the names of those involved go deep onto both benches.

plus, it goes beyond politicians. they all need to burn, but for some reason, suddenly the list is a dem hoax now.

2 hours ago, Mike31mt said:

This is a monumental pile of word salad nonsense. Sorry, you're failing to explain away how you are holding Trump to a higher standard than anyone in the DNC, just because he actually talked about and went about bringing Epstein to justice.

By your logic, if Trump wouldn't have ever mentioned Epstein then you'd be totally fine with him ignoring it altogether like the Dems did.

You're all so full of ish and transparently so.

If your red line was not voting for pedophiles, why'd you vote for the guy who showered with his own underage daughter, and then completely ignored the entire case for 4 years?

Do liberals even know what red lines mean??

1 minute ago, Gannan said:

he puts so much effort into his deflections. the current POTUS is covering all this up, but all he wants to talk about is biden.

but, but, but, but, what about this, what about that. 🤣

4 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

awaiting the next deflection.

The chickens are coming home to roost, Trump. Can you say impeachment.

Megyn Kelly Admits Trump May Have ‘Blessed’ Epstein Cover-Up

Donald Trump-loyalist Megyn Kelly said he may have "blessed” a cover-up of Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes, in a shocking admission that stands against her previous comments about the president.

Maybe "there is something there and it’s being covered up and the president blessed it,” Kelly said on her daily podcast, making guest Ben Shapiro’s eyes widen and eyebrows raise.

my bet is that cheeto is having his minions write up a "summary " of the epstein files for public release. much like barr’s "summary " of the mueller russia report….a completely scrubbed version filled with alternative facts that don’t paint trump in a negative light. i’m sure they’re working on this "bondi report” right now.

1 hour ago, Mike31mt said:

Trump isn't involved, you nitwit.

"Obvious coverup" lol

Holy ish! You are an absolute fool. HAHAHAAAA!!!!!!