Just now, 315Eagles said:

Question is who will be the clear cut #1 pick? I've seen different mock drafts with different #1's.

NYG I'm guessing dont need a QB. Raiders do. They probably have different ideas about who they'd take first. There doesn't seem to be a clear cut best player in this draft.

If the Giants get the number one pick and they do not trade out of that number one pick to somebody who needs a quarterback, they are dumb. They should be trading that pick and trying to cash in on getting a boatload of assets.

We want the Lions to win this right?

Lions are up 10 on the Rams... because they missed a FG that would have made them up 13.

What an amazing LA team. They should be 99.9999999% favored to win the next 5 Super Bowls because everyone loves LA.

1 minute ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

If the Giants get the number one pick and they do not trade out of that number one pick to somebody who needs a quarterback, they are dumb. They should be trading that pick and trying to cash in on getting a boatload of assets.

Unless there is a player they really like, which i dont know.

17 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Get it but it wasn’t just him. It was the way the OL blocked, fast decisions, holes for Tank. Arguably one of the best the offensive as a whole has looked all year outside of scripted plays. Everything was clicking even if it was one drive. It wasn't laborious.

So what is the point of this if you're telling me you weren't insinuating the OL was somehow better because McKee was in there instead of Hurts? Maybe others can weigh in it sure seems to me you're attributing this 4th qtr drive performance to McKee vs Hurts

5 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

According to fan duel and DK rams are nfc favorites and bills (fan duel had bills/broncos even before the start of the broncos game now slight broncos favorite) afc. I think both conferences are wide open though.

I think afc it’s more everybody trusts Josh Allen more than all the other quarterbacks that are likely to be in the playoffs. Herbert hasn’t won a game and been awful postseason. Maye has not even played in a playoff game. Bo nix looked bad last year as a rookie in a playoff game. Stroud and Lawrence have playoff wins but they’ve also had bad games in the postseason. Ravens currently outside looking in. No one fears the Steelers.

The bills defense will be the reason they win nothing.

4 minutes ago, 315Eagles said:

Question is who will be the clear cut #1 pick? I've seen different mock drafts with different #1's.

NYG I'm guessing dont need a QB. Raiders do. They probably have different ideas about who they'd take first. There doesn't seem to be a clear cut best player in this draft.

If they pick 1, 2, 3, or 4 and they believe in Dart, the best thing they can do is trade the pick for players and a bunch of picks.

They don't need 1 guy, They need about 10.

Just now, 315Eagles said:

Unless there is a player they really like, which i dont know.

Even if there was a player they liked. They have more needs than one player. Furthermore there is not a stud OL that should be no. 1 pick. Nor do they continue to need DL help. They are loaded there. Gonna use no. 1 pick on wr, LB, cb or S. Seems like he prudent move would be cashing out on that value for someone that wants Mendoza at 1.

2 minutes ago, SkippyX said:

Lions are up 10 on the Rams... because they missed a FG that would have made them up 13.

What an amazing LA team. They should be 99.9999999% favored to win the next 5 Super Bowls because everyone loves LA.

I appreciate the attitude, but the game isn't over. Would not be surprised at all to see the Rams win.

2 minutes ago, BDawk_ASamuel said:

Is that All-Pro worthy?

Fan Duel Odds at the start of last year's playoffs.

1. Kansas City Chiefs: +350

2. Detroit Lions: +450

3. Baltimore Ravens: +550

4. Buffalo Bills: +600

5. Philadelphia Eagles: +700

I hope it worked for betting purposes because it was 💩 at prediction.

5 minutes ago, pgcd3 said:

So what is the point of this if you're telling me you weren't insinuating the OL was somehow better because McKee was in there instead of Hurts? Maybe others can weigh in it sure seems to me you're attributing this 4th qtr drive performance to McKee vs Hurts

I am. But the backup OL isn't better than the starters. They moved people off the ball better on multiple runs which I attribute to the defense having to respect how McKee throws the ball. Again, he is more decisive and in this offense that is what is holding the team back with Hurts

1 minute ago, Diehardfan said:

I am. But the backup OL isn't better than the starters. They moved people off the ball better on multiple runs which I attribute to the defense having to respect how McKee throws the ball. Again, he is more decisive and in this offense that is what is holding the team back with Hurts

This is ridiculous on so many levels. The game was over. They were not worried about anything McKee could possibly do. It was done.

Five different teams for that NFC that are playing the 4 pm games have a shot to be the #1 seed. 🙃🙃

1 minute ago, Diehardfan said:

I am. But the backup OL isn't better than the starters. They moved people off the ball better on multiple runs which I attribute to the defense having to respect how McKee throws the ball. Again, he is more decisive and in this offense that is what is holding the team back with Hurts

So your thesis is that in the 4th qtr of a game they were down 31-0 that the Raiders defense intentionally backed off more because the respected how Tanner McKee throws the ball more than than Hurts? You really believe that??

Just now, pgcd3 said:

So your thesis is that in the 4th qtr of a game they were down 31-0 that the Raiders defense intentionally backed off more because the respected how Tanner McKee throws the ball more than than Hurts? You really believe that??

I think that’s Skip Bayless trolling you there.

The Eagles can Clinch the NFC East Saturday with Win and a Dallas Loss tonight.

1 minute ago, Eriv20 said:

The bills defense will be the reason they win nothing.

Normally I’d agree. It’s their Achilles heel nearly every year. However the teams with legitimate defenses in the afc also have offensive questions. Broncos are very hit or miss on offense. Texans offense looks great against inferior defense. Buffalo showed today they can score on New England’s defense.  Chargers oline is a disaster and last 4 weeks only raiders game did they look good.

If the bills have to play on wild card weekend, the teams they probably want to avoid is Jacksonville or Texans. Lawrence is playing really well and coen has that offense hitting its stride. Their defense is surprisingly good at home (18.5 ppg— really the rams laying it on them makes it higher cause outside of that game (happened early in the season) it’s 16 ppg). Houston beat them but imo i think playing Houston a second time would help Buffalo out more in how to attack that defense. Plus Buffalo was down multiple players in that game. 

`

8 minutes ago, Freshmilk said:

Is that All-Pro worthy?

He should be in the convo and DeJawn might be the best overall DB in the league this year.

Just now, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Normally I’d agree. It’s their Achilles heel nearly every year. However the teams with legitimate defenses in the afc also have offensive questions. Broncos are very hit or miss on offense. Texans offense looks great against inferior defense. Buffalo showed today they can score on New England’s defense.  Chargers oline is a disaster and last 4 weeks only raiders game did they look good.

If the bills have to play on wild card weekend, the team they probably want to avoid is Jacksonville or Texans. Lawrence is playing really well and coen has that offense hitting its stride. Their defense is surprisingly good at home (18.5 ppg— really the rams laying it on them makes it higher cause outside of that game (happened early in the season) it’s 16 ppg). Houston beat them but imo i think playing Houston a second time would help Buffalo out more in how to attack that defense. Plus Buffalo was down multiple players in that game. 

They’re 2 games back of the 1 seed. They’ll be playing wild card weekend

No turnovers

Only three penalties (I don't think any presnap, but can't remember the third)

No points allowed

Offensive operation looked MUCH cleaner

Those are the things you can take away as major positives.

1 minute ago, Eriv20 said:

They’re 2 games back of the 1 seed. They’ll be playing wild card weekend

1 game back if broncos lose today. Broncos still have jags and at chargers left. New England probably wins the division if they beat Baltimore at Baltimore next week. Although even if they lose they hold the tiebreaker as currently they are 3-1 vs. division and bills are 3-2. They’d have to beat the jets and dolphins to end the season.

6 minutes ago, pgcd3 said:

So your thesis is that in the 4th qtr of a game they were down 31-0 that the Raiders defense intentionally backed off more because the respected how Tanner McKee throws the ball more than than Hurts? You really believe that?

?

My theory which is correct is Hurts can't make decisions or process and in this offense it is holding them back. Their losses prove that and yeah one drive from someone who showed the same last year and in the preseason is better at that then Hurts.

9 minutes ago, Eriv20 said:

This is ridiculous on so many levels. The game was over. They were not worried about anything McKee could possibly do. It was done.

Lots of excuses for Hurts hugging. He isn't as good of a leader but he is better running this offense.