21 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Who would be fool enough to make that trade?

I would be all over trading for Dak if I were the Vikings or Falcons. Probably if I were the Cardinals as well.

6 hours ago, Alphagrand said:

Posters who support firing Sirianni are buffoons and not worth interacting with.

Nick has to get all the credit in the world. The fact he keeps this team winning even with a huge handicap at the QB position with Hurts shows me he is legit 😝😆

1 hour ago, RememberTheKoy said:

I would be all over trading for Dak if I were the Vikings or Falcons. Probably if I were the Cardinals as well.

Eagles would be a top 5 offense with Dak leading this talented offensive group. 😁

1 minute ago, DeathByEagle said:

Nick has to get all the credit in the world. The fact he keeps this team winning even with a huge handicap at the QB position with Hurts shows me he is legit 😝😆

Howie for creating a team with talent that can overcome bad coaching

10 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

Howie for creating a team with talent that can overcome bad coaching

That would make sense if they had a great QB maximizing the talent. The QB is a huge anchor and the coach won a super bowl with him and keeps making deep playoff runs in spite of him. Howie and Nick are the real deal.

1 hour ago, RememberTheKoy said:

I would be all over trading for Dak if I were the Vikings or Falcons. Probably if I were the Cardinals as well.

I’d add Steelers if Rodgers retires, potentially the jets cause if they can’t get Mendoza and frankly they are also the jets. Would be a very jets thing to do. I could also see a team like the raiders if they win this weekend and don’t want to pay the price to move up to get a Mendoza. I think it also depends on what Dallas is willing to deal him for.

2 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

I’d add Steelers if Rodgers retires, potentially the jets cause if they can’t get Mendoza and frankly they are also the jets. Would be a very jets thing to do. I could also see a team like the raiders if they win this weekend and don’t want to pay the price to move up to get a Mendoza. I think it also depends on what Dallas is willing to deal him for.

Yea. Dak is entering his "Kirk Cousins” era of his career. He could go to a lot of places but it likely doesn’t make much of a difference.

I like how the Eagles match up with the Bills. If the DL avoids sleepwalking a la the Bears game, I think the Eagles will win by double digits.

Bills will be one dimensional all game. Big opportunity for Jihaad Campbell

28 minutes ago, DeathByEagle said:

Eagles would be a top 5 offense with Dak leading this talented offensive group. 😁

A top 5 quickest exit from the playoffs too.

5 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

I’d add Steelers if Rodgers retires, potentially the jets cause if they can’t get Mendoza and frankly they are also the jets. Would be a very jets thing to do. I could also see a team like the raiders if they win this weekend and don’t want to pay the price to move up to get a Mendoza. I think it also depends on what Dallas is willing to deal him for.

I think with the Vikings with Kevin McConnell it could be like Stafford going to the Rams with McVay. Very talented roster with a great offensive HC. Vikings should genuinely be trying for a Dak trade this offseason and Dak should be open to that as well.

Didn't Dak just sign his record breaking contract? I don't think it's possible to move on from him in the 2nd year

12 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

Didn't Dak just sign his record breaking contract? I don't think it's possible to move on from him in the 2nd year

What if a team blows Jerry away though with an offer consisting of a late first round pick, a future 3rd round pick and a 30 year old interior lineman?

43 minutes ago, DeathByEagle said:

Eagles would be a top 5 offense with Dak leading this talented offensive group. 😁

Imagine the chaos on the blog when the team loses in the 2nd round of the playoffs with Dak.

29 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Yea. Dak is entering his "Kirk Cousins” era of his career. He could go to a lot of places but it likely doesn’t make much of a difference.

I don’t think he’s ever gonna win anywhere he goes unless he just somehow has a stacked roster that manages to overcome his shortcomings in playoff games. Even then i think he’d find a way to come up short in a big moment. But I could totally see teams like the Raiders, Cardinals, dolphins (although i don’t think they can do it cap wise with Tua’s hit) and Steelers believing he can and going for him.

17 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

What if a team blows Jerry away though with an offer consisting of a late first round pick, a future 3rd round pick and a 30 year old interior lineman?

I'm not a cap guy but I just don't think it's remotely possible in his 2nd year

3 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

I'm not a cap guy but I just don't think it's remotely possible in his 2nd year

We are going to get the Bills Super Bowl here. I do wonder though if that comes into the equation of this game at all for the Eagles for the game really not meaning TOO much postseason wise, is the potential of playing the Bills again in a month and half for the Super Bowl. AFC is wide open for them to take with all the teams that aren't in it in the AFC. This is the Bills best chance. How much do the Eagles coaches really show this game knowing that? Maybe set them up for a rematch? Is KP smart enough for something like that?

50 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

I think with the Vikings with Kevin McConnell it could be like Stafford going to the Rams with McVay. Very talented roster with a great offensive HC. Vikings should genuinely be trying for a Dak trade this offseason and Dak should be open to that as well.

Yeah, I am sure O'Connell will be happy to go back to an older veteran QB. It's not like they he's had the chance to work with one in the past.

I get the team wants Lane to play, but Johnson has earned the right to come back when he's healthy. Besides, we rushed Dickerson/Jurgens back so I actually trust Lane here more.

8 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

We are going to get the Bills Super Bowl here. I do wonder though if that comes into the equation of this game at all for the Eagles for the game really not meaning TOO much postseason wise, is the potential of playing the Bills again in a month and half for the Super Bowl. AFC is wide open for them to take with all the teams that aren't in it in the AFC. This is the Bills best chance. How much do the Eagles coaches really show this game knowing that? Maybe set them up for a rematch? Is KP smart enough for something like that?

I don't think it matters much from a offensive scheme standpoint. The Bills have a bad defense. It may matter more from a defensive game plan. The defense has struggled against scrambling QBs. Do they just play it safe in this game in order to have something up their sleeve if they have a re-match.

7 hours ago, Eagles1960 said:

Shanahan has been to two Superbowls losing both to KC including one in OT. He may not be Bill Walsh but he isn't some scrub like a Matt Eberflus or Joe Judge. H would be hired in literally two seconds by another NFL team if he wanted toleave the Niners.

I believe his 49ers also had the lead in both SBs he lost. He was the OC for Atlanta when they had that historic choke job in the SB. He's a good offensive mind for sure but a little over rated as a HC. He's someone that has also relied on assistant coaches, particularly Defensive coordinators when he had really good teams.

19 minutes ago, RLC said:

I get the team wants Lane to play, but Johnson has earned the right to come back when he's healthy. Besides, we rushed Dickerson/Jurgens back so I actually trust Lane here more.

All 3 should be shut down until playoffs

10 hours ago, HazletonEagle said:

TampaTrey didnt think it's Lanes last year so they drafted the OT with intent to kick him inside. They did that instead of taking Ioane.

TampaTrey didnt seem to think the CB was an Eagles type of CB but the other guy was insisting he is a good fit.

The TE the took is a receiving TE. They felt the dropoff at TE was bigger than at WR there. They could have taken the WR and then they were talking about some in line TE in the next round.

They ended up taking the receiving TE and the WR they wanted ended up falling to that next pick anyway.

I don’t want to invest a 1st into a G while we have both Landon and Steen under contract next year. Lomu (1) or Pringos (3) are the type of tackle projects that might be available with both the preferred athleticism and armlength, although ideally they’ll need a redshirt with Stout and Lane’s vitamins. Getting a Day 2 iOL makes sense to me for estate planning and short-term depth.

Agreed on CB, taller/faster/better.

I thought the Cincy TE was above 250lbs, so potentially a Y type that might be able to play inline and block. I guess a F type/ TE2 is a possibility but they seem easier to find in FA.

The WR class seems fairly deep, so a good year to find a cheap replacement for Dotson (AJ as well, but that has been explained as an impossibility this offseason due to the cap).

37 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

Yeah, I am sure O'Connell will be happy to go back to an older veteran QB. It's not like they he's had the chance to work with one in the past.

Yeah and they had their best success with Cousins and Dak is far better than Cousins.