Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

 

People always point out how the staff alwys underestimate how long a player will be out. This time they overestimated, now it all averages out.

  • Replies 62.3k
  • Views 2.6m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

49 minutes ago, RLC said:

 

Ertz for Robinson

I love ARob, but this team needs more young talent, not more veterans. We are clearly not a player away.

5 minutes ago, RLC said:

I love ARob, but this team needs more young talent, not more veterans. We are clearly not a player away.

We can’t really afford to trade quality assets for FAs to be either. 

Just now, ManuManu said:

We can’t really afford to trade quality assets for FAs to be either. 

Agreed. Ertz for picks is ideal.

(Someone enters saying Howie shouldn't be picking the players)

1 minute ago, ManuManu said:

We can’t really afford to trade quality assets for FAs to be either. 

Comp pickzzzz

1 hour ago, RLC said:

 

Chance of Injury in 2020: question mark 90%
Chance of Injury per Game: question mark 13.4%
Projected Games missed for 2020: question mark

3.2

 

 

 

https://sportsinjurypredictor.com/player/allen-robinson/6978

 

Sounds like our type of guy!

55 minutes ago, Godfather said:

 

Jeffery for Robinson straight up

No way the bears do that deal straight up. Throw in JJ Arcego-Whiteside 

Why would we trade one money hungry guy for another money hungry guy when we cant sign Ertz due to money. Makes zero sense.

1 minute ago, DeathByEagle said:

Why would we trade one money hungry guy for another money hungry guy when we cant sign Ertz due to money. Makes zero sense.

Not much has been making sense in here recently 

42 minutes ago, RLC said:

I love ARob, but this team needs more young talent, not more veterans. We are clearly not a player away.

 

36 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

We can’t really afford to trade quality assets for FAs to be either. 

How about Alshon for Robinson?   Alshon would love to go back to Chicago, and I'm sure they'd be happy to have him.   Everybody is happy.

scary to think we could be 1-5 in the next five games. do u think we can beat ravens, rams, 49rs, steelers? ill give them the bengals.

4 minutes ago, pangbun said:

scary to think we could be 1-5 in the next five games. do u think we can beat ravens, rams, 49rs, steelers? ill give them the bengals.

Hell, even the Bengals worry me. We've been historically bad against them. I believe we have only beaten them 3 times total.

40 minutes ago, DeathByEagle said:

Why would we trade one money hungry guy for another money hungry guy when we cant sign Ertz due to money. Makes zero sense.

Not saying the trade would make sense but I don't think the issue is we can't sign Ertz due to money, it's that he wants more than he is worth to this team.  I would bet any money that if Dallas Goedert wasn't on the team Ertz would have his new contract and be happy as a clam.  The fact is, there is a super talented tight end behind him who is going to probably command an even bigger contract and he's 4 years younger, offers a more athletic skill set and is also a better blocker.  Not taking away from what Ertz is or has done but where we are today, Goedert is a bigger threat on the field and offers more potential down the road.

8 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said:

Hell, even the Bengals worry me. We've been historically bad against them. I believe we have only beaten them 3 times total.

Yep. Been 20 years since the last victory

14 minutes ago, pangbun said:

scary to think we could be 1-5 in the next five games. do u think we can beat ravens, rams, 49rs, steelers? ill give them the bengals.

If we don't get the Oline fixed better than last week, it isn't looking good to win many of those.

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

Yep. Been 20 years since the last victory

Damn, you're right. I was thinking at first, nah, I know we beat them in the Reid era. I was at the game, but then I remembered, it was the final week of the 2000 season. Damn time flies.

14 minutes ago, pangbun said:

scary to think we could be 1-5 in the next five games. do u think we can beat ravens, rams, 49rs, steelers? ill give them the bengals.

Maybe Bengals but I thought that about the Skins 

1 minute ago, EagleJoe8 said:

Damn, you're right. I was thinking at first, nah, I know we beat them in the Reid era. I was at the game, but then I remembered, it was the final week of the 2000 season. Damn time flies.

I blame McNabb for not knowing games end in ties

Any word on Hargrave? We didn’t put him on IR but will miss more than 3 games with "lower body soreness”.

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

I blame McNabb for not knowing games end in ties

Hell, even that was 12 years ago.

If we go 1-5 can we then go for Lawrence pls? Kthx

1 hour ago, In2football said:

Scores so far

                                        eagles.        rams


greend.                        21.                 32
downundermike         28.                 17
4for4eaglesnest.        3.                   21
br3.                                17.                28
eaglesphan1986.         27.                24
eagleseagles.               14.                27
myerstheman.              10.                 28
alphagrand.                   20.                 30
Godfather.                       0.                  2
bacarty.                           20.                30
asg15.                             10.                34
Mediterranean diet.       27.               24
devpool.                           17.               36
In2football.                      27.                17

 

@In2football

Eagles 23

Rams 20

 

2 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

 

How many vet WR have the 49ers brought in?  Seems like every other week they are.