2 minutes ago, Wentz_Era said:

Yet he's in the game over Fulgham.

unforgiveable

Just now, HazletonEagle said:

cause a FG wins the game then. 

And if you don't get the 2?

1 minute ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Ok... last 2 pointer I could understand.   This one... I don't get.

I’m guessing they think the game will come down to a field goal, they want that field goal to win not tie. 

This is going to fail and then haunt them later in the game 

Just now, greend said:

And if you don't get the 2?

then a FG doesnt win the game. just like if youd kick the extra point.

This time out sucks. We were steam rolling them, and likely would have rolled them for 2 more. Now we have to stop and wait

I’m confused on why it’s taking so long to confirm a TD. It was clear as day

1 minute ago, Casey @ Bat said:

Analytical guys ... please don’t defend this nonsense 

That's the only explanation though... if the thought is that you'll score 2 on more than 50% of the time, then going for it makes sense... but you are committed to doing it EVERY time, basically for it to really pay off.  

1 minute ago, Dwide Schrude said:

I’m guessing they think the game will come down to a field goal, they want that field goal to win not tie. 

I always read your content in Dwight’s voice

Dumb

Just no.

Why, Doug? Why? 

2PT makes sense again.  That way FG wins.  But even if you miss, you can still tie the game w/a TD and XP after a Giants FG.

Doug E Fresh truly an ANALYTICS GENIUS!!!

Doug is a buffoon 

Just now, Mike030270 said:

I’m confused on why it’s taking so long to confirm a TD. It was clear as day

giving Giants D a break before having to defend the 2 PC

Just now, TorontoEagle said:

This time out sucks. We were steam rolling them, and likely would have rolled them for 2 more. Now we have to stop and wait

But positive gives us longer time to wait to see the defense cause that could be ugly. 

F’ing A Doug. At least give it to Sanders if you’re going to try it. 

Well defense needs to respond. I don’t think they have generated a negative play since the 1st play sack. 

now we are down 4...   wentz had about 2.5 seconds before he was hit

Damn

I usually defend going for 2, but I don’t get it there. 

Kick the fuuggin extra point 

1 minute ago, TorontoEagle said:

This time out sucks. We were steam rolling them, and likely would have rolled them for 2 more. Now we have to stop and wait

That's likely accurate.  

could see that side of the line collapsing and just waiting for Wents to go run. And he just doesnt.... no awareness. 

RUN THE BALL.

You can see why the team so confused at times, cause it makes decisions like that.  Just needlessly dick swinging