Just now, eaglesflyers#1 said:

Looks like Matt Leo

Good call, I think you are right

1 minute ago, eaglesflyers#1 said:

Looks like Matt Leo

Best news of the week. 

14 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Yeah no Ish.   Why would anyone ponder that?  

It’s a bet on my bookies play card

 

7 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Nah, too big. Looked like a lineman or LB. Whoever this is. Might be Shaun Bradley. No one tweeted about it though so maybe its nothing. 

Not that that's good but it's better than slay

1 minute ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Keep making excuses for the guy.  You’re blind homerism is showing again.   

Is #99 hurt yet?

99 reminds me a lot of the offensive line last week...

Just realized that Brooks is on PUP and not IR. Hoping for a late season miracle.

2 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Is #99 hurt yet?

Too soon, man

1 minute ago, eaglesflyers#1 said:

Just realized that Brooks is on PUP and not IR. Hoping for a late season miracle.

It's just procedural. Doesn't really mean anything

3 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

 

Is #99 hurt yet?

I hope not.  He's starting at RG.  

Just now, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Keep making excuses for the guy.  You’re blind homerism is showing again.   

You, out of all people, should know you don’t base what a team is capable of from 1 game.   And you certainly can’t determine how good a draft is for "years” after. 
 

The O-Line is decimated as of now.  Hopefully some of the younger guys can step up or else we might be in for a long season.   
 

If you look at the roster (before injuries), it looked (at least) "solid”.   That’s how you grade a GM.  A GM can’t control injuries and you can’t expect a GM to fill the roster with 2nd and 3rd string pro bowlers. 

Someone may have posted it earlier, but here’s the article about play action pass efficiency and the running game.

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2018/rushing-success-and-play-action-passing

4 hours ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

You're an idiot.  

Well said.

2 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

If you truly think the amount of rushes, and success doesnt go into the success of  play action pass I cant help you

Help yourself. 

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2018/rushing-success-and-play-action-passing

1 hour ago, greend said:

Well that's way simpler than signing beckham. "Hey JJAW go sit on the freaking bench"

And putting who on the field?  I’m not over the moon and crying for OBJ. I’m just saying it’d be pretty arrogant after last season and week 1 to act like we’re above considering WR acquisitions. 

1 hour ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Yea, if anything, it was the slow starts in the last couple years that stick out more to me than a lack of adjustments in the second half of games.

And game 1 we did the exact opposite.

 

Started out hot and made no adjustments.

3 minutes ago, Allhaildawk said:

And putting who on the field?  I’m not over the moon and crying for OBJ. I’m just saying it’d be pretty arrogant after last season and week 1 to act like we’re above considering WR acquisitions. 

And we shouldn't grab a crazy mofo in desperation. It's not arrogance it's money and the side show.

So let’s get this straight. Let’s say the Eagles aren’t lying and DeSean is totally healthy. The Eagles had to have known for months they were going to give DeSean days off and make him limited during games to keep him fresh. You don’t just decide this in September.

and yet still, with knowing they were going to limit their #1 WR even when he’s not injured(which no other team in the NFL is doing) they waited until late April to address the position.

its utterly laughable.

14 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

 

After a few plays Sunday, they'll come out Monday and say he's out for the year

Just now, Sack that QB said:

So let’s get this straight. Let’s say the Eagles aren’t lying and DeSean is totally healthy. The Eagles had to have known for months they were going to give DeSean days off and make him limited during games to keep him fresh. You don’t just decide this in September.

and yet still, with knowing they were going to limit their #1 WR even when he’s not injured(which no other team in the NFL is doing) they waited until late April to address the position.

its utterly laughable.

No other team in the NFL give their receivers days off? 

5 minutes ago, PrinceKelby said:

And game 1 we did the exact opposite.

 

Started out hot and made no adjustments.

We were moving the ball and they only crossed midfield once the first half , what adjustments were necessary?

8 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

If you truly think the amount of rushes, and success doesnt go into the success of  play action pass I cant help you

Why isn't that premise supported by the data? 

Just now, greend said:

No other team in the NFL give their receivers days off? 

To some people, only the Eagles are slackers. No other team provides maintenance days to their best players.

Just now, NCiggles said:

Why isn't that premise supported by the data? 

The real question is why are you arguing with someone that is too stubborn to admit that he's wrong?

Just now, greend said:

No other team in the NFL give their receivers days off? 

No other team in the NFL has uninjured #1 WRs on limited snaps in week 1 of a season. I’ve never heard of something so crazy. They took him out for almost an entire quarter because they wanted to "limit him”

But apparently he’s 100% healthy.

Just now, RLC said:

To some people, only the Eagles are slackers. No other team provides maintenance days to their best players.

I hope we never lose another game I mean the comedy of things to complain about in here is off the charts