20 minutes ago, Asg 15 said:

Sure do.

I lived in Ipwsich for 4 years.

Also flew out of RAF Fairford near Swindon

Ah very good! Yeah so I'm from a little city called Gloucester. I'm sure you've heard of it having lived here for a few years. 

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Rams already announced they are all white, so it's going to be some type of Green.

You smashed my hopes pretty quickly there.

11 minutes ago, jsb235 said:

This is what has been widely quoted.

"PS players can be activated on game day before the team announces their inactives (90 minutes before game time). The player doesn’t have to be elevated from the PS to the main roster for the move. This can happen with up to two practice squad players per week, but the same player can’t be elevated two weeks in a row. A player is only able to be elevated twice per season. To be put activated a third time requires the player to be signed to the regular roster."

I pulled this from this website.

https://www.ninersnation.com/2020/9/6/21424594/49ers-everything-you-need-to-know-about-how-the-nfls-practice-squad-works

But it looks like it came from a press release as the exact wording is used on a bunch of other sites.

Interesting. This is all I've seen on it. I guess we'll find out. 

New CBA rule: Additionally, according to the new CBA, a team can carry up to 55 players on its roster during the week -- up from 53 in past years -- by elevating one or two players from its practice squad before 4 p.m. ET on the day before that team's game. This will allow teams a larger pool from which to select their 47 or 48 game-day active players. Any player elevated from the practice squad for this purpose will immediately revert to his team's practice squad on the day after the game.

No player may be activated under this rule for more than two games per season, either regular-season or postseason games. If a player has already been elevated twice under this rule, and the team wants to add him to the roster, it must terminate his practice-squad contract and sign him to an NFL contract, as has been the case with practice-squad players in years past.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/29820641/inside-new-nfl-roster-rules-2020-expanded-rosters-practice-squad-injured-reserve

 

9 minutes ago, schuy7 said:

You smashed my hopes pretty quickly there.

My b.

I would love the White on Green though. I hate White on White. I feel like they always suck in it

7 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Interesting. This is all I've seen on it. I guess we'll find out. 

New CBA rule: Additionally, according to the new CBA, a team can carry up to 55 players on its roster during the week -- up from 53 in past years -- by elevating one or two players from its practice squad before 4 p.m. ET on the day before that team's game. This will allow teams a larger pool from which to select their 47 or 48 game-day active players. Any player elevated from the practice squad for this purpose will immediately revert to his team's practice squad on the day after the game.

No player may be activated under this rule for more than two games per season, either regular-season or postseason games. If a player has already been elevated twice under this rule, and the team wants to add him to the roster, it must terminate his practice-squad contract and sign him to an NFL contract, as has been the case with practice-squad players in years past.

Yup, it's definitely confusing and the "twice in a row" clause didn't make sense to me. But it's been somewhat widely reported so i don't know what to think.

I thought McGill played really well and I thought they would add him to the roster for this week, but they signed the guards instead. So maybe they can call him up.

I still think Hargrave plays, though, if he is healthy, since getting him the snaps would be beneficial.

1 hour ago, UK_EaglesFan89 said:

At some point though you've got to find one or two starters there. You've got to find a handful of depth guys. All of them are gone!

They would be gone anyway.  Miller, replaced by Toohill.  Gibson, replaced by Hightower.  Qualls, replaced by Ridgeway. Walker, replaced by Bradley.  Jones, replaced by Maddox.  Countess, replaced by Wallace.  Etc.  

18 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

White on white looks sharp.  White on green looks stupid.   

You only like it because it reminds you of this 

 

 

Finally got a semblance of the All 22.  Sequencing is a bit screwed up.  

OL -  Driscoll needs a little work on his anchor.  Otherwise, nice technique.  Two possible brain farts.  Herbig looked decent.  No pull though and not sure he has that in him.  Peters owes the Eagles a refund. Real bad game.

Wish I could send Ward’s tape to Manu.  Really solid play.   JJAW did a lot of blocking and even some moving screening. He was open but Wentz never looked his way. Reagor looks good.  His blocking, not so much.   DJax more open than targeted and Wentz was not accurate. Behind and high. 

One poor cover by Maddox but otherwise good.  Same with NRC.  When LeBlanc was in, he was active. Mills was really good at the LOS.  Rodney able to play centerfield.  Riley targeted a few times.  Performed well. BG may be the best player on D but Sweat looked really good.  Not impressed by Avery at all.  Double team Cox and Jackson obliterates your line. When Hargrave gets healthy, the middle of the line is going to be close to worth the cost.

Prediction - Reagor, Ward at PR is going to be a fun competition. One of them is going to break a long return real soon. 

2 hours ago, Iggles_Phan said:

He said, "I'm ready to go."  It means he wants to leave.  Clear as day.

Yeah I’m a little distracted today with my wife’s car being stolen, it’s pretty obvious now that you explained it to me

 

 

Man how did this team blow a 17-0 lead to a team with the worst QB in the league. So pathetic 

36 minutes ago, downundermike said:

Yeah I’m a little distracted today with my wife’s car being stolen, it’s pretty obvious now that you explained it to me

WTF?!?! That sucks. Sorry to hear man.

Just now, EagleJoe8 said:

WTF?!?! That sucks. Sorry to hear man.

After colliding with police cruiser 

 

1 minute ago, downundermike said:

After colliding with police cruiser 

 

The people who stole it did that?

40 minutes ago, downundermike said:

Yeah I’m a little distracted today with my wife’s car being stolen, it’s pretty obvious now that you explained it to me

Sorry to hear about that.  Hopefully she is safe. 

52 minutes ago, BigEFly said:

Finally got a semblance of the All 22.  Sequencing is a bit screwed up.  

OL -  Driscoll needs a little work on his anchor.  Otherwise, nice technique.  Two possible brain farts.  Herbig looked decent.  No pull though and not sure he has that in him.  Peters owes the Eagles a refund. Real bad game.

Wish I could send Ward’s tape to Manu.  Really solid play.   JJAW did a lot of blocking and even some moving screening. He was open but Wentz never looked his way. Reagor looks good.  His blocking, not so much.   DJax more open than targeted and Wentz was not accurate. Behind and high. 

One poor cover by Maddox but otherwise good.  Same with NRC.  When LeBlanc was in, he was active. Mills was really good at the LOS.  Rodney able to play centerfield.  Riley targeted a few times.  Performed well. BG may be the best player on D but Sweat looked really good.  Not impressed by Avery at all.  Double team Cox and Jackson obliterates your line. When Hargrave gets healthy, the middle of the line is going to be close to worth the cost.

Prediction - Reagor, Ward at PR is going to be a fun competition. One of them is going to break a long return real soon. 

I’m sure I would be far less impressed than you were. 

5 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said:

The people who stole it did that?

When they hit the cop car

4 minutes ago, downundermike said:

After colliding with police cruiser 

 

If you have insurance, this would be a Comprehensive loss, not a Collision loss.  The former usually is much cheaper to purchase and most people carry a lower deductible on it.  The loss is derivative of theft, which is under Comprehensive coverage. 

That looks like a typical female drivers car. Was there any damage from the thieves hitting the cop car?

6 minutes ago, BigEFly said:

If you have insurance, this would be a Comprehensive loss, not a Collision loss.  The former usually is much cheaper to purchase and most people carry a lower deductible on it.  The loss is derivative of theft, which is under Comprehensive coverage. 

Only had liability and uninsured

5 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

I’m sure I would be far less impressed than you were. 

But still more impressed.  Ward runs good routes, catches the ball.  Nice elevation on his jumps and decent quickness. He is going to be a good slot receiver.  Wish we had JJAW blocking on that screen where Reagor whiffed the block.   I suspect that would have been a twenty to thirty yard gain.  Thing is, I suspect Reagor is the type of kid that shakes his head viewing that missed block and goes to work on it.  Reagor and DJax looked good on their routes. Of course, there is a lot of presumption in that because I don’t know what the call was. 

8 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

That looks like a typical female drivers car. Was there any damage from the thieves hitting the cop car?

Good thing for you that we don’t have your wife’s email.  We could blackmail you with this statement.  The ransom would be requiring you to post only positive comments about Barnett. 

3 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Damn.  

Yeah, 2020 continues to suck for me personally

18 minutes ago, downundermike said:

When they hit the cop car

Damn. Sorry to hear that happened. 

4 minutes ago, BigEFly said:

Good thing for you that we don’t have your wife’s email.  We could blackmail you with this statement.  The ransom would be requiring you to post only positive comments about Barnett.

Doesn’t that fall under cruel and unusual punishment?

4 minutes ago, BigEFly said:

Good thing for you that we don’t have your wife’s email.  We could blackmail you with this statement.  The ransom would be requiring you to post only positive comments about Barnett. 

 she knows what kind of driver she is. painted lines on the road are just a suggestion to her.