5 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

 

 

27 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Great. So the whole take the temperature at doctor offices saying you are safe if you don't have one is BS. I'll tell my nurse friends who say the same thing when they go to work. As far as I've been told by them if you don't have a fever or symptoms it is very very low or they wouldn't be allowed in the NICU. Absolute? Who knows.

No, it's not BS because it's not a guarantee of safety, it's just one way of many to screen out potential carriers. It's like saying "Going through a metal detector and bag search at the game means I'll be safe from injury if I get into a fight with some drunken idiot." No, in reality, some drunken idiot could still smuggle a glass bottle in and smash you over the head with it. The security screening just mitigates that risk, but doesn't eliminate it. Not really a difficult concept.

2 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

Also, when did they test positive? Information is all over the map, but some doctors have said you can only spread it when you have a fever or symptoms. 

Those doctors would be wrong. There are mountains of evidence documenting asymptomatic spread.

2 hours ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Take it for what it’s worth. I saw and read the article. Figured I’d post it 

"There are some rumblings from people inside the league who I spoke with earlier this week who feel that Doug Pederson may have reached his limit. Doug Pederson may be stressed out a little bit. Basically, it’s not going to get any better for Doug Pederson,”

 

 

Judging by the amount of "pop up" ads all over that site, I would take anything coming from them with a grain of salt.  Sort of obvious it is a "click-bait" article.  

 

38 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

I wonder how many times they can fit "Doug Pederson" into a paragraph. It reminds me of this:

 

That entire article is written just like those "junk" articles you see pop up all over Facebook, Twitter, etc.  Obvious click bait, imo. 

Just now, Ace Nova said:

That entire article is written just like those "junk" articles you see pop up all over Facebook, Twitter, etc.  Obvious click bait, imo. 

Oh I didn't click it, just reading that part that was quoted. 

48 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

The line on this Eagles Rams game has been all over the place. Opened Eagles -3, went all the way to Rams -2, now back to Eagles -1.

 

Coming back up now that Lane and Miles have gotten practices in and looking like they'll both play. 

1 hour ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Take it for what it’s worth. I saw and read the article. Figured I’d post it 

"There are some rumblings from people inside the league who I spoke with earlier this week who feel that Doug Pederson may have reached his limit. Doug Pederson may be stressed out a little bit. Basically, it’s not going to get any better for Doug Pederson,”

One loss and this is what you get? Who wrote this? 

5 minutes ago, Ace Nova said:

 

 

Junk journalism by a "junk site", imo. Judging by the amount of "pop up" ads all over that site, I would take anything coming from them with a grain of salt.  Beyond obvious click-bait material and click-bait site.

 

It’s a good site for draft stuff. 

1 minute ago, ManuManu said:

It’s a good site for draft stuff. 

Could be.  And maybe they’re "hurting” for clicks since it’s not draft season.  But that article, the way it’s written and the amount of pop-ups all over that article remind me of those "click bait” articles you see all over social media.   
 

The article takes 1 line from another person’s opinion (from some sort of podcast) and attempts to write an entire article around it.  Smh. 
 

 

Looking forward to something different on offense...

1 minute ago, ManuManu said:

 

Yup. One of the reasons Schwartz does well against the McVay/Shanahan tree is that the DL plays the pass on the way to the run. So play-action is less effective when the DL doesn't bite on play-fakes. Of course, this puts more pressure on the LBs/Safeties to properly read everything.. They should be attacking our LBs with boots all day. Of course, if our DL is winning up front, we can just tell our LBs not to move.

13 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

One loss and this is what you get? Who wrote this? 

written Article was dumb as it was horribly written. Tony Pauline who works with the eagles During the draft from time to time was the one who reported it on his podcast. 

20 minutes ago, Ace Nova said:

 

 

Junk journalism by a "junk site", imo. Judging by the amount of "pop up" ads all over that site, I would take anything coming from them with a grain of salt.  Beyond obvious click-bait material and click-bait site.

 

Site might be junk however tony Pauline has worked with the eagles during the draft in the past and doesn’t usually just throw things out there reported it on its podcast. Whether it is accurate or not time will tell. The site can be complete garbage but Pauline isn’t the type of guy that’s just throws things out there like that. Especially not when he’s actually worked with the eagles organization during their drafts in the past. 

and even Pauline said he hopes it isn’t true what he was told by other nfl people. 

22 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Those doctors would be wrong. There are mountains of evidence documenting asymptomatic spread.

 

24 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

No, it's not BS because it's not a guarantee of safety, it's just one way of many to screen out potential carriers. It's like saying "Going through a metal detector and bag search at the game means I'll be safe from injury if I get into a fight with some drunken idiot." No, in reality, some drunken idiot could still smuggle a glass bottle in and smash you over the head with it. The security screening just mitigates that risk, but doesn't eliminate it. Not really a difficult concept.

Are you a doctor yourself?

I brought up something before the Washington game, about how with no crowds in stadiums, if Wentz's hard count would be much better in road games. It clearly was, as it drew a few offsides. The problem I have, is it seems Kelce doesn't react to the defense jumping. If he can't see them, there should be a word used by Wentz for an immediate snap, so that we can get a free play off. With Reagor and Djax on the field, it's absolutely worth just chucking up a bomb in this situation. To me, it looks like they hadn't even considered it in the few times the Washington's jumped off side. 

1 minute ago, Diehardfan said:

 

Are you a doctor yourself?

Is wearing a mask in public really that hard for you? 

3 hours ago, In2football said:

I had you down as 21-3 Rams. I adjusted to new score.

Here is a list of scores so far

                                        eagles.        rams

greend.                        21.                 32
downundermike         28.                 17
4for4eaglesnest.        27.                  17
br3.                                17.                28
eaglesphan1986.         27.                24
eagleseagles.               14.                27
myerstheman.              10.                 28
alphagrand.                   20.                 30
Godfather.                       0.                  2
bacarty.                           20.                30
asg15.                             10.                34
Mediterranean diet.       27.               24
devpool.                           17.               36
westbrook36.                   13.              30
in2football.                       27.             17
Hans Solo                         23.              20
trotterisgod.                      33.              24
mike020370.                      17.              26
acenova.                              30.             21

 

I will be ok for this week but there is a chance Hurricane teddy kicks our a** early next week. 

@In2football

Eagles 27

Rams 20

 

All issues will be forgotten! 

7 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

 

Are you a doctor yourself?

No but I did stay at a Holiday Inn last night.

6 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

I brought up something before the Washington game, about how with no crowds in stadiums, if Wentz's hard count would be much better in road games. It clearly was, as it drew a few offsides. The problem I have, is it seems Kelce doesn't react to the defense jumping. If he can't see them, there should be a word used by Wentz for an immediate snap, so that we can get a free play off. With Reagor and Djax on the field, it's absolutely worth just chucking up a bomb in this situation. To me, it looks like they hadn't even considered it in the few times the Washington's jumped off side. 

Is wearing a mask in public really that hard for you? 

You'd think they're being asked to sacrifice their first born child with the way some of them argue against it.

14 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

I brought up something before the Washington game, about how with no crowds in stadiums, if Wentz's hard count would be much better in road games. It clearly was, as it drew a few offsides. The problem I have, is it seems Kelce doesn't react to the defense jumping. If he can't see them, there should be a word used by Wentz for an immediate snap, so that we can get a free play off. With Reagor and Djax on the field, it's absolutely worth just chucking up a bomb in this situation. To me, it looks like they hadn't even considered it in the few times the Washington's jumped off side. 

Is wearing a mask in public really that hard for you? 

WTF are you even talking about, dude. Masks didn't come up at all until this reply right here. We are talking about people who actually were wearing masks at the game anyway, but thanks for shoving your nose in.

6 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

You'd think they're being asked to sacrifice their first born child with the way some of them argue against it.

Nobody here was talking masks. We are talking about fans who were wearing masks, but thanks for getting on your hill without reason.

 

8 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

WTF are you even talking about, dude. Masks didn't come up at all until this reply right here. We are talking about people who actually were wearing masks at the game anyway, but thanks for shoving your nose in.

Nobody here was talking masks. We are talking about fans who were wearing masks, but thanks for getting on your hill without reason.

It was a simple question. Which you failed to answer. 

 

3 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

It was a simple question. Which you failed to answer. 

When you ask a spastic question out of no place that has nothing to do with what I was talking about I'm probably not answering.