LOL.

Great coverage on this drive 

Just now, ManuManu said:

Empty sets are smart. People seem to hate them, but it’s hard to disguise coverage. This should give Wentz a clearly defined primary read. Of course, our primary probably can’t win anyway. 

Yep.  Wentz can’t make the right read...AND we don’t have a weapon capable of consistently beating even a busted matchup.

let me point this put one more time

 

WIDE OPEN TE WITH TIME TO THROW.

 

that has to be wentz fault.. lol

Singleton. You're fired.

2 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

That’s about what it’s going to be with the Packers at home.  

So... giving up a TD 2/3 of the time is now considered 'good' for a defense?   I mean, I get it... the numbers say the defense isn't as putrid as the offense.  But, when you are giving away TDs at that clip, that's bad.    And yeah, I know that the Packers are the top scoring team in the NFL... but the point total is less important than the percentage.   In order to win, the offense would need to be basically perfect... and score on every possession against them.

That's not on the secondary. That's on the front 4 for getting zero pressure. 

3 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

I will drive off a bridge

You gotta wait in line on that one

1 minute ago, RLC said:

What is this play-design.

You mean slow developing plays when the eagles oline isn’t very good? Also noticeable on the all 22. They run these plays like we have the SB oline. 

It’s nice to see a QB who doesn’t get nervous when defenders are around him. 

Mills also sucks.

Again, how the F does a freakin' TE get THAT wide open?  And Rodgers so cool in the pocket there then just flicks an easy one downfield. 

 

anyone saying the defense is playing well, must be watching a different game than i am? 

Fing embarrassing...again lol

LaFleur is just toying with this defense. 14 points allowed at half is in itself a good job by the defense, but he can unleash Rodgers and that passing game at any time and put 40 up. They’re running just for the sake of running. 

Bout time for Wentz to throw a hero ball INT. 

In other news, the Seahawks are up 5-0 at the half against the Gints. What an O slugfest that is

Singleton again or was that on the safety. 

Stop returning kicks 

9 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

Packers will, at best, have 14 points at the half.  That’s a win for our defense.  

They’ve had the ball 3x with 2 long T’d drives. D sucks too.

I think the Eagles were down 14-3 to GB last year...

1 minute ago, Iggles25 said:

Bout time for Wentz to throw a hero ball INT. 

We can be down by 21-3

1 minute ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

You mean slow developing plays when the eagles oline isn’t very good? Also noticeable on the all 22. They run these plays like we have the SB oline. 

And this is why Doug needs to go too. Offense struggles and you still have slow developing plays 

Just now, Iggles_Phan said:

So... giving up a TD 2/3 of the time is now considered 'good' for a defense?   I mean, I get it... the numbers say the defense isn't as putrid as the offense.  But, when you are giving away TDs at that clip, that's bad.    And yeah, I know that the Packers are the top scoring team in the NFL... but the point total is less important than the percentage.   In order to win, the offense would need to be basically perfect... and score on every possession against them.

Yes to all of that.

If the Chiefs were playing in GB right now, the score is probably 14-14.

GB is a a great team with an elite offense.  You either beat them by getting lucky and facing their offense on a day of misfires or having your own perfect offensive outing.

Any defense would be helpless in dictating the outcome of the game.  That’s just how it is.  
 

Build your roster accordingly.

4 minutes ago, UK Eagle said:

It's a wonderful sunset on the Eagles season, thats the correct response

I nominate this for post of the game so far.