6 minutes ago, phil77 said:

Dont know if this is real or not

Yes, it is very real.  Now you have the leader of the defense supporting the benched starter.  Locker room rift coming, this thing is now gonna totally go off the rails.

 

Remember when we were running the RPO to near friggin' perfection and we could run an 8-minute touchdown drive?

Good times. 

 

Just now, downundermike said:

No need.  I watch football all day Sunday, watch Thursday, Monday, whenever it is on.  I don't need an analysis of what I am seeing.  Our offense is stale, old, not fooling anyone.

I know you do but this goes out to the people who I know don’t watch any other team around the league. And they don’t watch the all 22. I know the ones who say they watch it and they have no clue what they’re watching or they just don’t watch it and are lying. Because if you saw some of the play that we called late in that Seahawks game knowing Matt pryor was getting abused by a bad defensive line you would never call those plays that took that long to begin with. 

Just now, downundermike said:

Yes, it is very real.

 

Hmmmm there goes that entire Doug had to play Hurts to save the locker room talk from earlier in this thread.  Like I said this is massive and will lead to big changes this offseason.  Doug or Wentz will have to go period or the locker room will continue to have issues. 

Hurts will start next game, maybe the rest of the season.  They can't unload Wentz yet due to his contract.  How they are dealing with a QB controversy in the off-season? 

2 minutes ago, downundermike said:

Yes, it is very real.

What is Cox saying here?

1 hour ago, Desertbirds said:

The Eagles looking for that magical spark to reverse their fortunes:

 

Doug's gameplan for this week:

 

2 minutes ago, hukdonfoniks said:

Remember when we were running the RPO to near friggin' perfection and we could run an 8-minute touchdown drive?

Good times. 

 

Vaguely

2 hours ago, Sack that QB said:

Me wanting Hurts to look great, but also wanting a loss for Chase or Sewell

 

Same

2 minutes ago, greend said:

What is Cox saying here?

That he chooses Wentz over Hurts

I'm glad the Eagles are pulling out all the stops to save a 3-8-1 season...

14 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Lmao

I did say that. And he didn’t start on that week. I said he didn’t want to put him out there  because it showed that the offense does struggle it would reflect poorly on him. I also said they should start them against Dallas or Arizona because he probably would have success and then doug could say look I got the offense back on track. Interesting how you left that part off.

Just like your assumption and narrative that Alshon Jeffery was going to come back and the wide receiving corps was going to be ok. or relying on DeSean Jackson he was gonna be good when he came back. Or that we didn’t need Robbie Anderson. Or that DeSean Jackson over the last two years has been better then Robby Anderson. Or the fact when we had the discussion about bottom five wide receiving groups I brought up all those teams and the Eagles would right now be at the bottom five still.

Please go get wasted again, come back on here crying like a little baby and then start with your we should’ve kept nick foles. And then start deflecting blame about doug.

The difference between you and I is that I gladly admit when I'm wrong...you seem to like dying on your hill.   I'll eat crow. I've done it here plenty. 

 I admitted that in hindsight, the WR situation wasn't as good as I expected it to be,  Even in that case, the jury is still out to a degree because if all of a sudden the WR's look remarkably better with a new QB....well....

And I don't cry.  Certainly not for a football team (as much as I might like following them)...but you keep on going on and on and on with your passive aggressive attacks and straw man arguments whenever someone "calls you out", you've been doing it here for years, so it's to be expected. 

 

 

1 hour ago, bpac55 said:

Mailata gonna be a player I'm telling you.  

 

That's next level stuff.

The Fletcher Cox post should be spreading like wild fire. 

1 minute ago, schuy7 said:

That he chooses Wentz over Hurts

Wow, that's bold. But if that's how he feels Doug may have just lost the team.

watch hurts win out, somehow the eagles get into the playoffs, and then get bounced out first round...  just so we have the worst pick available to a team that was garbage all season.

that and hurts winning out brings even more fire to the qb controversy in the offseason.

20 minutes ago, downundermike said:

Actually he is 100% correct.

I would expect you would think that.  You're both wrong, then. 

The least surprising outcome with Hurts.

2 minutes ago, Ace Nova said:

The difference between you and I is that I gladly admit when I'm wrong...

No you do not.  You never admitted that players can be tagged with the intention of trading them, even though it happened multiple times since the discussion.

4 minutes ago, Penn7980 said:

Hurts will start next game, maybe the rest of the season.  They can't unload Wentz yet due to his contract.  How they are dealing with a QB controversy in the off-season? 

Depends.  Who do you think "they" will be?

13 minutes ago, phil77 said:

 

 

 

I dont do social media. Can someone explain what I'm looking at? Fletch liked a post with pictures of hurts and wentz? I dont get it.

1 minute ago, RLC said:

The least surprising outcome with Hurts.

 

 

Well I guess except Fletcher Cox right? 

2 minutes ago, greend said:

Wow, that's bold. But if that's how he feels Doug may have just lost the team.

May have?  That was like 4 weeks ago at least.

I don't know how much that Cox like means. Jalen Reagor liked a tweet about Wentz benched and Hurts starting. I think its just guys sticking up for who they are closer with.

Just now, Khani1 said:

May have?  That was like 4 weeks ago at least.

No I think most of them have tried to play hard for him.