Just now, DawkinsOwnage03 said:

We are going to have even less talent on the field than what we have had, what good is a 3 point win over the Bengals the worst football team in the league?  Now if they are going to beat the Bengals and then continue to win games that’s one thing, but I just don’t see it.  They better wake the f up now and go do something.

I just don't see it bud. This team is playing bad football for a reason... Because sadly this is a pretty bad team. I hate to say that, I hate to admit that but I just think it is true. 

22 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Damnit. Long day lol 

not surprised. I thought malik was cooked when we signed him. He already was a poor run defender, he was declining in Jacksonville and then add on a lis franc injury. Not really all that surprised. Hargrave i think it’s the fact he needs time. Didn’t really have training camp. Ditto with Barnett plus Barnett has always been underwhelming 

Yup.i thought at the time the malik jackson signing was a waste. Dude was done in jacksonville he was just a name.

I think Hargrave 2 gapping for 4 seasons is going to need a few games to adjust especially without a pre season.

I think Cox is cooked and not worth the money he's making.

Can't remember the last time Howie drafted a productive DT. Cox was Reid's last draft. How much input howie had is debatable.

Would be nice to have some young talent at DL, I like Hargrave and think at some point howie needs to draft a DT instead of relying on FA.

God I hope Cox isn’t cooked enough not to get a good trade for him.

What a coincidence,  " I " after a long layoff "practiced" today for the first time too.  Sadly , no Alshon game check. Matters NOT! 

 

 

4 minutes ago, DawkinsOwnage03 said:

God I hope Cox isn’t cooked enough not to get a good trade for him.

They're not trading Cox.

3 minutes ago, DawkinsOwnage03 said:

God I hope Cox isn’t cooked enough not to get a good trade for him.

With that salary? I don't think Cox is cooked, but I don't think he is good enough to justify his salary in a trade.

2 hours ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

Herbig apparently just had a great game at RG... why are they moving him to LG?? 

Only thing I came up with is they think Herbig can help solidify the left side of the line with Peters playing like a 38 year old, and they can minimize the liability of Pryor by putting him between Kelce and Johnson 

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

Only thing I came up with is they think Herbig can help solidify the left side of the line with Peters playing like a 38 year old, and they can minimize the liability of Pryor by putting him between Kelce and Johnson 

Maybe they think Herbig is better at LG than RG but Seumalo was blocking him. 

8 minutes ago, DawkinsOwnage03 said:

God I hope Cox isn’t cooked enough not to get a good trade for him.

I don’t know if cox is cooked. I just don’t think he’s dominant anymore to justify his cap number. Still good just not what we’ve seen. 

7 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

Maybe they think Herbig is better at LG than RG but Seumalo was blocking him. 

Maybe, I just don’t recall him ever lining up their at TC. He was always either first team RG or C if Kelce was resting or second team C. Seems like a big ask to just move him in the middle of the season so there has to be some reason why.

 

18 minutes ago, DawkinsOwnage03 said:

God I hope Cox isn’t cooked enough not to get a good trade for him.

You know that's going to be the case.  He is going to end up on IR and someone will get him for a 5th round pick.

some of the fans in this thread are getting really pathetic. I pray some of you guys never face any real life adversity 

47 minutes ago, DawkinsOwnage03 said:

God I hope Cox isn’t cooked enough not to get a good trade for him.

No one will trade anything of value for him.  He will have to agree to some kind of major restructure as well.

38 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Maybe, I just don’t recall him ever lining up their at TC. He was always either first team RG or C if Kelce was resting or second team C. Seems like a big ask to just move him in the middle of the season so there has to be some reason why.

they want Wentz to fumble more

42 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

 

In watching that clip, Fletch looks baaaaad. If it's the injury, sit him until he right. Maaaan.

3 minutes ago, Saltpeter said:

In watching that clip, Fletch looks baaaaad. If it's the injury, sit him until he right. Maaaan.

He just looks beat right. Like he looks like he's got nothing there...

10 minutes ago, UK_EaglesFan89 said:

He just looks beat right. Like he looks like he's got nothing there...

Hungry dogs run fasterrrrr!

1 minute ago, schuy7 said:

Hungry dogs run fasterrrrr!

Some get lazy and wait for the food to come to them...

1 hour ago, ManuManu said:

 

Don’t know where he’s getting those stats from but espn has him at 2 QB Hits. Both came in the first half against Washington. And that play, Goff gets it off before he was hit. Even if you give him that it’s 3 and his run d which was an issue in Jacksonville was an issue last week.  
 

17 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Don’t know where he’s getting those stats from but espn has him at 2 QB Hits. Both came in the first half against Washington. And that play, Goff gets it off before he was hit. Even if you give him that it’s 3 and his run d which was an issue in Jacksonville was an issue last week.  
 

No passes defended. That was apparent

2 hours ago, LeanMeanGM said:

McNabb in 2003. This was his first 6 games

Donovan McNabb Gamelogs for Career Games 55 to 60

 

 

		Games		Passing												Rushing				Fumbles
Year	Tm	G	GS	Cmp	Att	Inc	Cmp%	Yds	TD	Int	Rate	Sk	Yds	Y/A	AY/A	Att	Yds	Y/A	TD	Fmb	FL	FF	FR	Yds	TD
Per Game Average				15.2	31.7	16.5		142.3	0.3	1		3.5	21			5.8	28.8		0	1.5	0.5	0	0	0	0
2003-2003	PHI	6	6	91	190	99	47.89	854	2	6	51.1	21	126	4.49	3.28	35	173	4.94	0	9	3	0	0	0	0

 

I don't remember him being that bad, but that is some god awful numbers. 142 yards per game, 48% completion and 51 passer rating to go with just 2 TD's to 9 TO's and 21 sacks taken. Coincidentally this was his 5th year as well. Unfortunately we don't have the D to have these QB numbers and still end the season 12-4 like the 2003 team did. 

 

Yeah our 2003 team still had an outstanding defense along w/a running game that carried us.  I remember McNabb had a problem w/his right thumb that made him extremely inaccurate throwing those first six weeks.

We can only hope Wentz can blame in injury for his similarly atrocious play this year.

2 hours ago, TrotterIsGod said:

They're not trading Cox.

They should, what's his cap next year 20 mil?

His impact is no where near that value.

Trade him when he still has some market value.

57 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Don’t know where he’s getting those stats from but espn has him at 2 QB Hits. Both came in the first half against Washington. And that play, Goff gets it off before he was hit. Even if you give him that it’s 3 and his run d which was an issue in Jacksonville was an issue last week.  
 

He quotes PFF a lot, so that would be my guess. 

11 minutes ago, Utebird said:

They should, what's his cap next year 20 mil?

His impact is no where near that value.

Trade him when he still has some market value.

Ertz too

 

stockpile and acquire young talent like all the good teams did and do