1 minute ago, schuy7 said:

Nah, the Rams are good.

Not sure...

also, the steelers wins have all come agains teams with horrible records. 

49ers coming off two ugly losses. If rams were for real they should be winning this game. 

1 minute ago, 315Eagles said:

Higgins is better than any WR on our roster right now whether he's considered fast or slow.

We got Fulgham. We’re good there. 

1 minute ago, eagle45 said:

Why do we openly call Jason Babin a fraud just for having an abrasive personality, being inconsistent versus the run, and having the most consistently excellent season rushing the passer we've seen in 2 decades?  And the Philly media just openly refers to the guy as a fraud.

I don't remember all of the specifics but he was a humongous d-bag the way acted, his attitude towards the team and such.  I like sacks though.

7 minutes ago, devpool said:

So what are everyone's expectations with 10 games left? I can't see them doing any better than 5-5 down the stretch with all the injury issues. 6-9-1 is their ceiling IMO. No playoffs 

3-12-1 , team is soft like the coach , doug will get carson killed at some point with some double reverse flea flicker pass for minus 2 yards. then kelce will go down and the team will finish the season without 1 day 1 starter on the field on the offense side. thus securing a top 5 pick.

The team we beat is rolling over a team that embarrassed us.  Just one of those years in the NFL.

2 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

Yikes

 

I’d like to know the breakdown by distance. 

56 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

Why do we openly call Jason Babin a fraud just for having an abrasive personality, being inconsistent versus the run, and having the most consistently excellent season rushing the passer we've seen in 2 decades?  And the Philly media just openly refers to the guy as a fraud.

He was a complete tool. Only cared about his sack numbers. Who cares how bad the defense played. He got his wide nine inflated sack numbers.

Miller has absolutely no upside whatsoever, why even bother?

2 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

I don't remember all of the specifics but he was a humongous d-bag the way acted, his attitude towards the team and such.  I like sacks though.

Wasn't the first, won't be the last.  He was Washburn's boy, so his handlers didn't get to write the Eagles history books.

Just now, ManuManu said:

We got Fulgham. We’re good there. 

I knew Reagor had to be the pick for the speed since Higgins gets no credit there. But I really was wishing for a scenario where we got Reagor and Higgins in round 2. Reagor/Higgins/Fulgham could have been very promising. 

Just now, ManuManu said:

I’d like to know the breakdown by distance. 

Well we know he's missed 3 from beyond 50 this year.

2 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

Why do we openly call Jason Babin a fraud just for having an abrasive personality, being inconsistent versus the run, and having the most consistently excellent season rushing the passer we've seen in 2 decades?  And the Philly media just openly refers to the guy as a fraud.

I think he actively didn’t give a S about the run, and the reporters likely know a lot of stuff from behind the scenes that they haven’t reported on openly. 

Just now, Sack that QB said:

Miller has absolutely no upside whatsoever, why even bother?

It's the practice squad.  We've got people with no upside whatsoever on the roster.

1 minute ago, HazletonEagle said:

I knew Reagor had to be the pick for the speed since Higgins gets no credit there. But I really was wishing for a scenario where we got Reagor and Higgins in round 2. Reagor/Higgins/Fulgham could have been very promising. 

I would have liked that. I had no interest in Higgins at 21, but I think I ranked him sixth or seventh for the Eagles. 

Just now, HazletonEagle said:

I knew Reagor had to be the pick for the speed since Higgins gets no credit there. But I really was wishing for a scenario where we got Reagor and Higgins in round 2. Reagor/Higgins/Fulgham could have been very promising. 

Yea, pretty sure the majority of us on here wanted to go WR back-to-back with how stacked the class was.  I think Pittman going to the Colts in Round 2 is what started a run earlier than expected.  Eagles would have probably taken Hurts anyway but yea, Reagor for speed and Higgins for his playmaking abilities would have been a nice haul.

3 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

I didn't like Higgins on paper, watched some of his college work, then begrudgingly admitted that he looked really good.  I still didn't care for his fit here, still don't.  But he has always made plays.  If you are getting caught from behind, you are probably doing something right in the first place.

Who's the only WR right now that is doing anything for this offense?  Fulgham, right?  He's not a speed guy by any means.  He's a big body, go up and get the ball type of player.  Similiar to Higgins.  I think Higgins would fit in just fine. 

Not to say we didnt need Reagor and his speed but I felt Higgins would end up as a better player in 2-3 years.

3 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

I knew Reagor had to be the pick for the speed since Higgins gets no credit there. But I really was wishing for a scenario where we got Reagor and Higgins in round 2. Reagor/Higgins/Fulgham could have been very promising. 

I really wanted Reagor and Claypool, less so Higgins.  

7 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

This is surprising.  I thought he might have had 2 sacks on the year.  Be nice for BG to finally hit 10.

 

We need to be sellers at the trade deadline. This team is absolutely horrible, devastated by injuries, 72 million over the cap, and are lacking big time on players that are young that have potential. 

Realistically, if we hit on picks and rebuild, we're looking at probably two years down the line with everything going our way to be a genuine contender again, which means Graham would be 34 years old.

We need to be taking calls on Graham and trading him while he still has value. Everyone on this team, besides Wentz, a very select few like Lane, maybe Slay, and any of the guys on rookie contracts minus Derek Barnett, need to be available and shipped off if there is an offer good enough. Ertz, Graham, Cox, (if anyone is crazy enough to give up a first), Malik Jackson, DeSean, Alshon, I'd all gladly trade in an effort to maximize our picks, create cap space and better set us up when we have an actual chance to win in the future.

9 minutes ago, schuy7 said:

Nah, the Rams are good.

Are they?  They should be winning this game if they were.

7 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

We got Fulgham. We’re good there. 

The sample size is small for both Fulgham and Higgins but my guess is Higgins will be better.  We'll see in a couple years.

I can't watch any NFL game without getting pissed at Howie.

1 minute ago, mattmcginley7 said:

We need to be sellers at the trade deadline. This team is absolutely horrible, devastated by injuries, 72 million over the cap, and are lacking big time on players that are young that have potential. 

Realistically, if we hit on picks and rebuild, we're looking at probably two years down the line with everything going our way to be a genuine contender again, which means Graham would be 34 years old.

We need to be taking calls on Graham and trading him while he still has value. Everyone on this team, besides Wentz, a very select few like Lane, maybe Slay, and any of the guys on rookie contracts minus Derek Barnett, need to be available and shipped off if there is an offer good enough. Ertz, Graham, Cox, (if anyone is crazy enough to give up a first), Malik Jackson, DeSean, Alshon, I'd all gladly trade in an effort to maximize our picks, create cap space and better set us up when we have an actual chance to win in the future.

Yep, they need to sell.  Thanks for SB52 but if you're aging with a huge contract and can bring back any sort of draft capital bring it on.

Just now, 315Eagles said:

Are they?  They should be winning this game if they were.

The sample size is small for both Fulgham and Higgins but my guess is Higgins will be better.  We'll see in a couple years.

I’m just kidding. Higgins should be better than him. 

1 minute ago, 315Eagles said:

Are they?  They should be winning this game if they were.

The sample size is small for both Fulgham and Higgins but my guess is Higgins will be better.  We'll see in a couple years.

The 49ers are a pretty good team too. They laid an egg last week, but they did win 13 games last year. Divisional game as well. 

Just now, schuy7 said:

The 49ers are a pretty good team too. They laid an egg last week, but they did win 13 games last year. Divisional game as well. 

I mean the Eagles beat them.  How good can the 49ers really be? 😄

32 minutes ago, Casey @ Bat said:

He’d have been out on IR if he was still here.

Nah they would have forced him to retire due to career ending finger injury☹️