Just now, Wentz_Era said:

WR1 with a 1st baseman type scoop there.

why did he have to do that? This offense was supposed to be predicated on getting the ball in space for RAC. Its hard to RAC when you have to scoop the ball like that.

Tdddddddd bigsby

Feed Tank!

They need to take that cowboy collar and extend it into little horse blinders for Saquon. We need him to do exactly what Tank and Shipley have done

That's better

Tank makes me wanna fight somebody

Tanks a beast.

O line looks good there

Just now, HazletonEagle said:

why did he have to do that? This offense was supposed to be predicated on getting the ball in space for RAC. Its hard to RAC when you have to scoop the ball like that.

Hurts got hit on that play.

Tank looking good

If this was last year then we would never see Tank Bigbsy again for several games after that.

Tank is nasty he has the perfect name

Time for Q to get a pick and then clap in Wards face

Honestly two pretty good long methodical drives. Just one dumb throw by Hurts.

Bigsby!

Big Tank LFG!

Side note - an average at best OL greatly depreciates Barkley’s value.

nice to see 2/2 moving the ball so far. Couldnt do that last week. Had to rely on a few big plays.

Bigsby is a tough runner old school RB

Check out #83 block. Rolling downhill.

1 minute ago, Parrot Head said:

Who could have thought that Tank was good

Dunno - seems like Tank/Ship are an adequate one, two.

Send Campbell or Epps on a blitz and knock that idiot Ward into next week

Just now, EaglePhan1986 said:

Big Tank LFG!

Side note - an average at best OL greatly depreciates Barkley’s value.

Hes not even a good player when he doesnt have that elite OL.

2 minutes ago, Swoop said:

Tanks a beast.

Beasts a tank. Works both ways.

Just now, Waiting4Someday said:

Dunno - seems like Tank/Ship are an adequate one, two.

I’m pretty concerned about Barkley effectiveness in this system

2 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

Hes not even a good player when he doesnt have that elite OL.

Seriously?