I'm thinking Biden should focus on curing Alzheimer's first - both for his sake and for some of the posters in here. 

Biden doesn't have Alzheimer's. He's just an old guy in a role that demands a lot. 

Still better than Trump, which is the choice we were given. And if we're given that choice again, Biden is still the clear choice. 

thank you for saving our economy, President Biden!   

 

 

1 hour ago, mikemack8 said:

I'm thinking Biden should focus on curing Alzheimer's first - both for his sake and for some of the posters in here. 

 I’m thinking the GOP should focus on having a better message than ish like this that they ignored when trump was in office. 

2 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said:

 I’m thinking the GOP should focus on having a better message than ish like this that they ignored when trump was in office. 

covfefe for everyone  !!!!!

20 hours ago, Gannan said:

I've never seen a race for anything, let alone president, where candidates ignored the front runner. It doesn't always work, but to simply ignore the front runner is folly. Most of the republicans running aren't real candidates, and they know it. 

Ok well we've never seen Trump and all of you guys wishing for these candidates to get up there and just tear into Trump are wrong.  That has completely backfired and why wouldn't it?  If all the candidates are just going to obsess over Trump they'll just vote for him anyway.  He controls the narrative right now and they have to wrestle it away.

Trading barbs with him is dumb and will always be dumb.

 cant wait untill they walk hunter out of the white house, never to hold a position there again. 

1 minute ago, Mike31mt said:

Ok well we've never seen Trump and all of you guys wishing for these candidates to get up there and just tear into Trump are wrong.  That has completely backfired and why wouldn't it?  If all the candidates are just going to obsess over Trump they'll just vote for him anyway.  He controls the narrative right now and they have to wrestle it away.

Trading barbs with him is dumb and will always be dumb.

ok, we get it as you have said it multiple times now. a great campaign strategy is to ignore the frontrunner. because trump. 

thanks for the advise mr. independent. 

8 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

Ok well we've never seen Trump and all of you guys wishing for these candidates to get up there and just tear into Trump are wrong.  That has completely backfired and why wouldn't it?  If all the candidates are just going to obsess over Trump they'll just vote for him anyway.  He controls the narrative right now and they have to wrestle it away.

Trading barbs with him is dumb and will always be dumb.

Yes, running for president on a platform of "my opponent was the greatest president ever and is perfect in every way" is a much wiser strategy. Great analysis as always Mike.

2 hours ago, mikemack8 said:

I'm thinking Biden should focus on curing Alzheimer's first - both for his sake and for some of the posters in here. 

He made progress a few weeks ago so check that off the list 

Donanemab was found to slow "clinical decline" by up to 35%, allowing people with Alzheimer's to continue performing day-to-day tasks such as shopping, housekeeping, managing their finances and taking medication

https://news.sky.com/story/new-drug-found-to-slow-alzheimers-hailed-a-turning-point-in-fight-against-disease-129223 13

40 minutes ago, Gannan said:

Yes, running for president on a platform of "my opponent was the greatest president ever and is perfect in every way" is a much wiser strategy. Great analysis as always Mike.

desantis and scott refuse to criticize trump or call him on his lies. they both play the i'm only looking forward card, except for when it comes to libs. i'm not sure where mike gets this idea that all the gop candidates are obsessing over trump. christie is the only one and maybe that is hurting his chances, but at least he is being honest. something that is foreign in politics. 

8 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

desantis and scott refuse to criticize trump or call him on his lies. they both play the i'm only looking forward card, except for when it comes to libs. i'm not sure where mike gets this idea that all the gop candidates are obsessing over trump. christie is the only one and maybe that is hurting his chances, but at least he is being honest. something that is foreign in politics. 

From his own fantasies, of course. We all know he has the attention span of a squirrel and can't be bothered to actually follow along. Probably doesn't help that his eyes have slowly drifted apart over the years so reading words has become increasingly more difficult for him.

14 hours ago, Tnt4philly said:

I did listen to it. More importantly, I listened to more of the speech than just a little snippet. I know it’s rare, but it sounds like he slurred his words. 

You listened to it then still posted the fraudulent transcript where they tried to rewrite what he said? Congratulation on your new job as an administration propagandist.

12 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

desantis and scott refuse to criticize trump or call him on his lies. they both play the i'm only looking forward card, except for when it comes to libs. i'm not sure where mike gets this idea that all the gop candidates are obsessing over trump. christie is the only one and maybe that is hurting his chances, but at least he is being honest. something that is foreign in politics. 

Hutchinson is too. But he's at like 0%

3 minutes ago, Gannan said:

Hutchinson is too. But he's at like 0%

both he & christie were never going to have a chance so why not i guess. at the end of the day there are far better choices in the gop. problem is, the gop voter base has become a bunch of swifties. 

 

23 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

You listened to it then still posted the fraudulent transcript where they tried to rewrite what he said? Congratulation on your new job as an administration propagandist.

The irony of Sarah over here calling anyone else an administration propagandist is why CVON is a guilty pleasure.

25 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

You listened to it then still posted the fraudulent transcript where they tried to rewrite what he said? Congratulation on your new job as an administration propagandist.

It’s not a fraudulent transcript.  He slurs his words from time to time. It also lines up with the preceding sentence where he says "we can do it”.   If he was trying to say it was already done, he wouldn’t have said "we can do it”, he would have said "we have done it” 

I mean, that sentence structure wouldn’t even make sense.  "We can do it.  We ended cancer as we know it”.   Vs. "we can do it.  We can end cancer as we know it”

Plea deal revived and back on.

 

15 hours ago, The_Omega said:

Except that’s not what he said. But why listen for yourself when you can just believe what politicians tell you?

The guy spoke for like 20 minutes about the need for better access to mental health treatment, and all you care about is a misspeak. In context it's clear he misspoke. 

He probably misspoke because he's old.

That doesn't mean he thinks cancer was cured 🙄 

Put up a better candidate and maybe we'll vote him out. 

17 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

The guy spoke for like 20 minutes about the need for better access to mental health treatment, and all you care about is a misspeak. In context it's clear he misspoke. 

He probably misspoke because he's old.

That doesn't mean he thinks cancer was cured 🙄 

Put up a better candidate and maybe we'll vote him out. 

He would rather nominate Trump and then complain about Biden for another four years. 

18 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

The guy spoke for like 20 minutes about the need for better access to mental health treatment, and all you care about is a misspeak. In context it's clear he misspoke. 

He probably misspoke because he's old.

That doesn't mean he thinks cancer was cured 🙄 

Put up a better candidate and maybe we'll vote him out. 

old man big meanie. words are weapons. yadda yadda yadda 

1 hour ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

ok, we get it as you have said it multiple times now. a great campaign strategy is to ignore the frontrunner. because trump. 

thanks for the advise mr. independent. 

Yeah you asked me and I answered, smart guy.

But please you guys go on about how Christie should get into a food fight on stage as his vote share dips into the fractions of a percentage.  

1 hour ago, Gannan said:

Yes, running for president on a platform of "my opponent was the greatest president ever and is perfect in every way" is a much wiser strategy. Great analysis as always Mike.

You guys are so butthurt. Is that what "ignore" means, gannan?