2 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Hey Slingblade, it's not my chart, I literally used the same the source material cited from the tweet I responded to. Also, I know how much you clowns struggle with calendars, but you can't pin the bankruptcies in both years on covid considering that our first case wasn't confirmed until 2020 which happened after 2019. It's too bad your local community college doesn't offer remedial classes to teach you how the passage of time works, it would save you from looking like such a moron all the time.

Then find another chart that isn't total BS.

Again, Biden hasn't done jack ish.  He didn't even end the pandemic.  Just sat on his rotting arse then arbitrarily declared victory when he needed some political points.

Just like right now where he can't hand out enough freebies to save his tanking numbers. 

A failed administration, elected based on bull ish, supported at this point only by other failures.  

 

 

1 hour ago, Mike31mt said:

Then find another chart that isn't total BS.

Again, Biden hasn't done jack ish.  He didn't even end the pandemic.  Just sat on his rotting arse then arbitrarily declared victory when he needed some political points.

Just like right now where he can't hand out enough freebies to save his tanking numbers. 

A failed administration, elected based on bull ish, supported at this point only by other failures.  

It's not BS, it clearly shows that 2023 bankruptcies are a fraction of what they were in 2019. Go back further than 2019 if you'd like but you're not gonna find a different answer. The bottom line is the same: you ass clowns constantly trip over yourselves with these misleading tweets and headlines and then cry foul because someone dared to take two minutes to prove how stupid you all are.

In

12 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

It's not BS, it clearly shows that 2023 bankruptcies are a fraction of what they were in 2019. Go back further than 2019 if you'd like but you're not gonna find a different answer. The bottom line is the same: you ass clowns constantly trip overyourselves with these misleading tweets and headlines and then cry foul because someone dared to take two minutes to prove how stupid you all are.

Preach

28 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

It's not BS, it clearly shows that 2023 bankruptcies are a fraction of what they were in 2019. Go back further than 2019 if you'd like but you're not gonna find a different answer. The bottom line is the same: you ass clowns constantly trip over yourselves with these misleading tweets and headlines and then cry foul because someone dared to take two minutes to prove how stupid you all are.

i mean, there was that two-year span, right before the real estate collapse when people used inflated appraisals to refi their houses to pay their debt off, only to run it right back up and then find out they owe $200k more on their two mortgages than their house is worth. 

2 hours ago, Kz! said:

Thank god daddy govt is here to keep companies from entering into contracts with willing customers!

Honestly, though, the replies are worth it. Restores a little bit of faith in humanity seeing slurry get rolled on social media.  

Damn him for looking out for the little guy

12 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

Damn him for looking out for the little guy

Well, they worship a clown who’s family made it’s fortune on screwing the little guy. 

24 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

Damn him for looking out for the idiot who doesn't bother to read the contract he or she signs then whines when they realize it costs too much

FYP

Competition is one of the cornerstones of a "free" market to encourage growth, reduce inflation, and drive innovation.  I see ensuring that competition is not undermined as more than reasonable to be seen as being in the fed government purview.  

 

15 minutes ago, mikemack8 said:

FYP

Yes, these dopes have to be protected from themselves because they are too dumb to read terms and conditions and just sign without knowing the ramifications of the actions they take.  I think they should get rid of finance fees on vehicles, houses, credit cards, etc.  Late fees should go away too, I'll pay when I want and if I don't want to pay you for say 10, 15 or 20 years that's my choice.  I know they just want to get rid of the student loans but I say lets go for all loans, credit cards, etc.  Lets have a universal bankruptcy for America, forgive all debts and start over.  If you have any loans don't worry, you now own whatever that loan was for free and clear.

  Republicans pretending to be staunch defenders of the free market when it suits them is my favorite. 

Seems like a fairly irrelevant "problem" to even try to address if you ask me (at least as far as the scope of TV services goes.) If you want to restrict the fees to be a percentage of the total contract cost, or limit the term of the contracts themselves, fine I guess, but seems like overreach to outright ban penalties when the consumer terminates a contract prematurely.

51 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

Damn him for looking out for the little guy

I know, the little guy has been under the boot of the evil cable companies for too long! Thank you, dear leader, for saving us!  

3 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

  Republicans pretending to be staunch defenders of the free market when it suits them is my favorite. 

Thanks for your input, Van.  It's appreciated, as always.

4 minutes ago, Kz! said:

I know, the little guy has been under the boot of the evil cable companies for too long! Thank you, dear leader, for saving us!  

How's that health care plan coming along? Is he still touting that as something he will do

 

The irony is not lost on us when you call someone else dear leader in a mocking tone. If Tucker or Trump asked you to gargle their load you would ask for how long and not question it one bit, your too much of a nincompoop to realize it. 

2 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

The irony is not lost on us when you call someone else dear leader. 

How's that health care plan coming along? Is he still touting that as something he will do

 

Wait, haven't you claimed to be a libertarian, too? 

6 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Wait, haven't you claimed to be a libertarian, too? 

Oh look the famed appeal to purity. 😂😂😂😂😂😂

1 minute ago, mikemack8 said:

Thanks for your input, Van.  It's appreciated, as always.

I appreciate the recognition but no need to thank me. 

Note to self: when you’re back at work, edit in the screenshot of Kz’s legendary "F the free market, government needs to go after businesses” post here. 

Just now, Tnt4philly said:

Oh look the famed appeal to purity. 😂😂😂😂😂😂

"Appeal to purity?"

The president cracking down on consumers voluntarily signing contracts with businesses is a violation of the basic principle of the movement. So there's no appeal to purity necessary. If you think it's a good thing the federal government is preventing voluntary association between companies and consumers, then you aren't a libertarian period. A debate isn't even necessary.  

This is why the CVON libertarian crew is so Fing hilarious. It's a bunch of full blown commies larping like they are anti-federal govt. You, wegot, riot kitchen, daeagles4life. I can only imagine how hard you freaks would be reeing if a legitimate libertarian rose to prominence in the US.  

10 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

I appreciate the recognition but no need to thank me. 

Note to self: when you’re back at work, edit in the screenshot of Kz’s legendary "F the free market, government needs to go after businesses” post here. 

I've wrecked van so hard he's got posts of mine saved on his actual work computer. You hate to see it.  

4 hours ago, Mike31mt said:

Then find another chart that isn't total BS.

Again, Biden hasn't done jack ish.  He didn't even end the pandemic.  Just sat on his rotting arse then arbitrarily declared victory when he needed some political points.

Just like right now where he can't hand out enough freebies to save his tanking numbers. 

A failed administration, elected based on bull ish, supported at this point only by other failures.  

1 hour ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Seems like a fairly irrelevant "problem" to even try to address if you ask me (at least as far as the scope of TV services goes.) If you want to restrict the fees to be a percentage of the total contract cost, or limit the term of the contracts themselves, fine I guess, but seems like overreach to outright ban penalties when the consumer terminates a contract prematurely.

I shouldn't have to hire a lawyer to interpret the 50,000 word click through agreements I have to agree to when I want to play a video game or subscribe to something. They've gotten so bad most employees in tech fields aren't authorized to sign them until in house counsel has reviewed them.