Just now, Kz! said:

 

Ya just hate to see it.

Read the report, shitbird. 

Link for reference: https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf

I can recall the month and day that my son died without much thought, it often takes a little more thought to remember the year. I can say the same thing in regards to all my kids birthdays. Recalling the month and day are a breeze, the year takes more thought. 

16 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Hur's comments about this exchange in his report was misleading at best. His report states: "He did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died."

The transcript of the exchange does not reflect that at all. Biden says the month and day, then his lawyer interjects and says 2015 for the year. No clue where the "several years" part comes from, but it's hilarious that Hur doesn't remember what he himself wrote in his report, especially after it made headlines around the world.  

 

The transcript absolutely reflects that.  The several years part comes from the interview.

Biden is asked where he kept the papers related to the things he was actively working on while living at Chain Bridge Road.  Biden then responds that he doesn’t know, and asks if it is around the 2017/2018 time frame.  Hur says yes.  Biden then says this would have been in the time frame that his son is either deployed, or is dying.   Then he goes onto say that people were encouraging him to run for president at this time, but that Obama thought Hillary had a better shot at winning. But that he hadn’t walked away from the idea that he’d run for president again.  And then says that Beau died on May 30th.  
his aides then interject that it was 2015 when Beau did.

So his timeline is in two separate places during this discussion. On one hand he’s talking about what he was working on while he was living on chain bridge road AFTER his VP term ended in 2017/2018, and then he’s talking about events going on in 2015. 

3 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said:

The transcript absolutely reflects that.  The several years part comes from the interview.

Biden is asked where he kept the papers related to the things he was actively working on while living at Chain Bridge Road.  Biden then responds that he doesn’t know, and asks if it is around the 2017/2018 time frame.  Hur says yes.  Biden then says this would have been in the time frame that his son is either deployed, or is dying.   Then he goes onto say that people were encouraging him to run for president at this time, but that Obama that Hillary had a better shot at winning. But that he hadn’t walked away from the idea that he’d run for president again.  And then says that Beau died on May 30th.  
his aides then interject that it was 2015 when Beau did.

So his timeline is in two separate places during this discussion. On one hand he’s talking about what he was working on while he was living on chain bridge road AFTER his VP term ended in 2017/2018, and then he’s talking about events going on in 2015. 

So you're saying when Biden states "in that 2017/2018 timeframe" it's fair for Hur to characterize that as being "not even within several years" of 2015?  

18 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Read the report, shitbird. 

Link for reference: https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf

You really are illiterate aren't you, little dude?

Biden literally asked if they were talking about 2017 or 2018 and then said "in this timeframe, my son is --- either been deployed or is dying..."

His son died in 2015. No one jumped in and saved him. I know you only consume copium msm articles about stuff like this, but they're feeding you misinfo again, bud.  

2 minutes ago, Kz! said:

You really are illiterate aren't you, little dude?

Biden literally asked if they were talking about 2017 or 2018 and then said "in this timeframe, my son is --- either been deployed or is dying..."

His son died in 2015. No one jumped in and saved him. I know you only consume copium msm articles about stuff like this, but they're feeding you misinfo again, bud.  

For the second time, since you can't read apparently... Hur says in his report that Biden couldn't remember the year, not even within several years. Which obviously paints a far different picture than what is reflected in the transcript.

Just now, we_gotta_believe said:

For the second time, since you can't read apparently... Hur says in his report that Biden couldn't remember the year, not even within several years. Which obviously paints a far different picture than what is reflected in the transcript.

Because that's the real story, right? Hur used "several" when he should have said "couple" so it's a non-story that Biden was three years off about his son's death.  

Holy sheet, the little libertarian is going hard in the paint for Biden. You love to see it.  

3 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Because that's the real story, right? Hur used "several" when he should have said "couple" so it's a non-story that Biden was three years off about his son's death.  

Holy sheet, the little libertarian is going hard in the paint for Biden. You love to see it.  

No you're right, the real story about Biden's handling of classified docs should be about the year Beau Biden died. That makes much more sense!  

Just now, we_gotta_believe said:

No you're right, the real story about Biden's handling of classified docs should be about the year Beau Biden died. That makes much more sense!  

The overarching theme is that Biden is too old and retarded to prosecute and the transcript backs that up. But that's some Grade A copium right there. "The thing I just spent several posts arguing about isn't that important anyway!"  

3 minutes ago, Kz! said:

The overarching theme is that Biden is too old and retarded to prosecute and the transcript backs that up. But that's some Grade A copium right there. "The thing I just spent several posts arguing about isn't that important anyway!"  

Yes, that's exactly the point. Hur stretched the truth by focusing on irrelevant details and got caught doing so. And he took the L today for it so I definitely can see why you relate to him in this situation. 

1 hour ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

Here you go loser:

But this is a great example of how dems trick low info NPCs like Riot Kitchen and we gotta believe into being like "herrderr Hur lied about Biden." She intentionally misleads people into thinking that Biden nailed the date and that Hur was lying about Biden not having any clue what year his son died in by focusing just on May 30. Then some NPC twitter account picks it up and tells people that Biden did in fact remember the date based on the transcript because he knows they're too stupid to read the actual exchange. Just an echo chamber of misinformation they're too stupid to break out of.  

7 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Yes, that's exactly the point. Hur stretched the truth by focusing on irrelevant details and got caught doing so. And he took the L today for it so I definitely can see why you relate to him in this situation. 

  

Did we learn whether Biden knows the difference between 9/11 and 7-11 today?  I hope so because that would be disqualifying. 

59 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Read the report, shitbird. 

Link for reference: https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf

🤣🤣🤣

54 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

So you're saying when Biden states "in that 2017/2018 timeframe" it's fair for Hur to characterize that as being "not even within several years" of 2015?  

I mean whatever semantics we want to play, he was 2-3 years off.  Anyway, the larger point is that between where the documents they were stored, how they were stored, the failure of recall in discussing the storage of those documents, it points to someone who mistakenly had them and forgot that he had them.  And not someone who purposefully retained them with the intent to violate the law.  

2 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said:

I mean whatever semantics we want to play, he was 2-3 years off.  Anyway, the larger point is that between where the documents they were stored, how they were stored, the failure of recall in discussing the storage of those documents, it points to someone who mistakenly had them and forgot that he had them.  And not someone who purposefully retained them with the intent to violate the law.  

Fair enough, I just think it's clear now that Hur was trying to portray certain aspects in the report that weren't exactly square with the transcript. Before today, all we had was the report to go off of, which made some scathing conclusions that didn't exactly paint Biden in a positive light. But with the release of the transcript, it seems to me that a lot of that is softened and Hur gets exposed as doing a bit too much editorializing.

37 minutes ago, Kz! said:

But this is a great example of how dems trick low info NPCs like Riot Kitchen and we gotta believe into being like "herrderr Hur lied about Biden." She intentionally misleads people into thinking that Biden nailed the date and that Hur was lying about Biden not having any clue what year his son died in by focusing just on May 30. Then some NPC twitter account picks it up and tells people that Biden did in fact remember the date based on the transcript because he knows they're too stupid to read the actual exchange. Just an echo chamber of misinformation they're too stupid to break out of.  

Once again... the transcript shows Biden got the day and month correct, just not the year. Before the transcript, all we had was the report that said Biden "couldn't remember when his son died, not even within several years." The implication being that he was off by like 7+ years and didn't know the day or month. In another line of questioning, Hur actually compliments Biden's recall of certain details of a trip to Mongolia. You can cling to Robert Hur's report all you want, but it's hardly the disqualifier you were hoping for. Especially when Trump makes gaffes like this every day he opens his mouth.

Someone needs to ask Trump what day and year Baron was born 

2 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

Someone needs to ask Trump what day and year Baron was born 

"Who is Baron?"

10 hours ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

them europeans are def weird, but i doubt they are protesting your daddy. 

He's dead so I doubt he'd notice. Alive I doubt he'd care. 😆

I knew the gymnastics performed today in this thread would be legendary. 

USA USA USA 🇺🇸 

2 hours ago, Phillyterp85 said:

The transcript absolutely reflects that.  The several years part comes from the interview.

Biden is asked where he kept the papers related to the things he was actively working on while living at Chain Bridge Road.  Biden then responds that he doesn’t know, and asks if it is around the 2017/2018 time frame.  Hur says yes.  Biden then says this would have been in the time frame that his son is either deployed, or is dying.   Then he goes onto say that people were encouraging him to run for president at this time, but that Obama thought Hillary had a better shot at winning. But that he hadn’t walked away from the idea that he’d run for president again.  And then says that Beau died on May 30th.  
his aides then interject that it was 2015 when Beau did.

So his timeline is in two separate places during this discussion. On one hand he’s talking about what he was working on while he was living on chain bridge road AFTER his VP term ended in 2017/2018, and then he’s talking about events going on in 2015. 

That's a weird way to read this man. 

To be sure he's not really directly answering Hur's question, and Hur himself suggests a break as this was well into the second hour of the interview, almost into the 3rd. But it's clear that Beau's death influenced his decision not to run in 2016, but also was influencing his decision to run by the time he's at the Chain Bridge location. He even relays a family meeting where Beau's son shows him a picture of him at Beau's funeral and tells him that he'd want Joe to run against Trump as when he decided he would enter the race.

Reading the line of questions in context, Biden is mentally reconstructing the timeframe leading up to the 2017-2018 period to try and answer the question as to what kinds of documents he might have been storing at Chain Bridge. It makes it clear because he's talking about Senators encouraging him to run for the presidency at the end of the Obama administration and when he says the correct date of Beau's death - May 30th - Ms. Cotton jumps in with the year. 

In any case, it was exactly the same line of questioning here Beau's death date is established when he continues to talk about his mindset in the 2017-2018 period, and he's relaying conversations he had with Beau before he passed about running for office. 

FWIW it's not uncommon for people to be unable to immediately recall the year loved ones passed. I have to think about it to recall the years my grandparents passed, and the most recent was the same year I was married. To me the fact that he quickly recalled the date of death and only had any apparent struggle with the year under questioning is pretty typical.

3 hours ago, Tnt4philly said:

I can recall the month and day that my son died without much thought, it often takes a little more thought to remember the year. I can say the same thing in regards to all my kids birthdays. Recalling the month and day are a breeze, the year takes more thought. 

Yes this is common. Grief tends to muddy certain things and sharpen others.

Most people can relay exactly where they were and what they were doing when they received news that a loved one died. But they often struggle to relay the date.

Acting like this is some kind of gotcha is ghoulish.

S&P closes at another all time high.

BIDEN MAKING AMERICA BETTER EVERYDAY IT SEEMS!