January 21Jan 21 7 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: cheeto is a convicted felon...34 counts...convicted in a court of law. the jan 6 rioters were convicted in the courts. the "biden crime family" is maga fanfiction. concept fyp-only a matter of days before he starts spewing more accusations WITHOUT evidence. Since he POTUS now I guess he will try do what he wants, it just won't involve the Biden family, or a decorated retired General.
January 21Jan 21 1 hour ago, MidMoFo said: If tax fraud and lying about substance abuse qualifies as a family crime syndicate the country is full of Genovese’s, Bonanno‘s, Lucchese’s, Gambino’s and Colombo’s How many Gambino's or Colombo's were the Vice President and allowed their idiot son to sit on the board of of a Ukrainian company being investigated for corruption while receiving kick backs to the tune of millions of dollars? I'm guessing none.
January 21Jan 21 3 hours ago, Tnt4philly said: You lost me at "Isn’t that true about…..” This is about pretending to be religious when you clearly are not, not sure what that rant was all about. It's mostly about the Media has been untrustworthy since at least 1960 and probably before that. But who could ever question Walter Cronkite, Huntley/Brinkley et. al.
January 21Jan 21 13 minutes ago, eglz1 said: It's mostly about the Media has been untrustworthy since at least 1960 and probably before that. But who could ever question Walter Cronkite, Huntley/Brinkley et. al. No, it’s all about Trump and his fake BS.
January 21Jan 21 Wikipedia has a good write up on the Burkick v. U.S. case regarding presidential pardons. They must be introduced into court proceedings to be effective, even in a capital punishment case. So consider the situation where you have somebody on death row who committed his capital crime for political purposes, and is willing to be executed to make a political statement. Even if that defendant is pardoned, unless and until he raises that pardon as a defense in the legal proceeding, the pardon is considered a private matter and the execution can proceed. Otherwise, if a defendant wishes to clear his name in a court of law, the pardon can be ignored or rejected, and the case can move forward. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burdick_v._United_States
January 21Jan 21 On 1/20/2025 at 1:51 PM, Procus said: Hmmm. Did it ever occur to you that there's just a tad of a possibility that those who were pardoned actually committed crimes? Did it ever occur to you that there's more than a reasonable possibility that Trump committed dozens of felonies? Of course not. Because you're a self-deceiving duplicitous moron.
January 21Jan 21 7 hours ago, The Norseman said: If they didn't do anything wrong they wouldn't need pardons. Keep buying the party line though...that's worked out really well over the last 4 years. Trump has made it clear he will go after anyone who was party to exposing his criminal behavior. This is all at his feet. Politics was always dirty business. Trump made it 10x worse.
January 21Jan 21 5 hours ago, eglz1 said: Isn't that true of most politicians on both sides of the aisle? Whether those who we rely on for unbiased facts choose to report on the fact that a candidate is a scumball is another matter. The bias and untrustworthiness of the media was brought home to me one day while sitting in the Martha's Vineyard airport. I picked up a local paper that was lying there and paged through it. One of the articles was by or about Pierre Salinger. Shortly before he died he disclosed that the news people knew the JFK was a libertine at best and rapist at worst. They also knew that if this became known JFK would lose to Richard Nixon. They made an agreement among themselves that what they knew about JFK would never become public knowledge while it still mattered. They were successful and JFK won the election by a slim margin. If this knowledge had become public - and remember this was 1960 - do you think he (JFK) would have won? And if Nixon had won in 1960, would Watergate ever have become a thing? That would have been a tragedy wouldn't it? Don't blow a hammy with those mental gymnastics.
January 21Jan 21 6 hours ago, It Hurts said: For the Record "The White House has been hinting for weeks that some last minute pardons were happening, but the decision to wait until the inauguration was underway to announce this is impossible to explain apart from an obvious desire to hide this until Biden was off the public stage.” —John Sexton "Biden pardoning his entire family in the last possible minute is one of the biggest abuses of power we’ve ever seen in this country’s history.” —Caleb Hull "Trump was impeached for bringing up Biden family criminal corruption. Today, Biden pardoned his family for criminal corruption. One side was right on this, the other was wrong. Now a matter of public record.” —Buck Sexton "So many of Donald Trump’s reported executive orders are just an undoing of Joe Biden’s madness and a return to sanity. The border should be closed?! No way! Men and women aren’t interchangeable?! What?! Criminals should be punished?! Gasp!” —Ian Haworth You quote partisan hacks "for the record"
January 21Jan 21 Ouch Quote one of Nancy Pelosi’s daughters recently likened Joe’s wife Jill Biden to Shakespeare’s heartless and ambitious Lady MacBeth. That stings. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/liz-peek-donald-trump-our-president-democrats-have-no-idea-what-do
January 22Jan 22 2 hours ago, The_Omega said: Yeah jack posobiec, noted liar and magatard, totally has inside information from Biden WH officials 🤣
January 22Jan 22 20 minutes ago, eglz1 said: Ouch https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/liz-peek-donald-trump-our-president-democrats-have-no-idea-what-do Who GAF? JFC, whose clone are you?
January 22Jan 22 10 hours ago, DiPros said: A Presidential Pardon does not take effect unless the suspect accepts it. That according to a little known, 1915 ruling from the Supreme Court, once accepted, the pardon serves as an "imputation of guilt,” or what’s more commonly known as an admission. Let that last part sink in before you attempt a witty retort "These public servants have served our nation with honor and distinction and do not deserve to be the targets of unjustified and politically motivated prosecutions," 43 years served and because of a sore loser he was accused of treason and threatened with death! Hang them on the mall
January 22Jan 22 1 hour ago, JohnSnowsHair said: Did it ever occur to you that there's more than a reasonable possibility that Trump committed dozens of felonies? Of course not. Because you're a self-deceiving duplicitous moron. You just keep gagging on St Biden's sack simp.
January 22Jan 22 2 hours ago, Procus said: Wikipedia has a good write up on the Burkick v. U.S. case regarding presidential pardons. They must be introduced into court proceedings to be effective, even in a capital punishment case. So consider the situation where you have somebody on death row who committed his capital crime for political purposes, and is willing to be executed to make a political statement. Even if that defendant is pardoned, unless and until he raises that pardon as a defense in the legal proceeding, the pardon is considered a private matter and the execution can proceed. Otherwise, if a defendant wishes to clear his name in a court of law, the pardon can be ignored or rejected, and the case can move forward. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burdick_v._United_States "But Trump has sullied our dementia addled saint" He's mean. Everyone of them should be in court proceedings to claim their pardon. Unlike others I'm for both sides staking their claims.
January 22Jan 22 How was it that Democrats Fed up their opportunity so bad that not only did Trump beat them again, he took the popular vote and clubbed them like a baby seal with it? Seriously.
January 22Jan 22 13 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said: Trump has made it clear he will go after anyone who was party to exposing his criminal behavior. This is all at his feet. Politics was always dirty business. Trump made it 10x worse. Look, I'm not going to defend Trump's pardons, but this is about the hypocrisy of the left. Biden's pardons were as bad as any president ever and he specifically said that he wouldn't pardon his family on multiple occasions. There is also ample evidence of shady foreign dealings with Hunter Biden and plenty of reason to suspect Joe was involved. The optics on this are terrible and you all need to take your lumps. The "but Trump" argument flat out doesn't work here.
January 22Jan 22 32 minutes ago, The Norseman said: There is also ample evidence of shady foreign dealings with Hunter Biden and plenty of reason to suspect Joe was involved. It’s funny that the "ample evidence” that MAGA says exists, never makes it to court.
January 22Jan 22 1 hour ago, The Norseman said: There is also ample evidence of shady foreign dealings with Hunter Biden and plenty of reason to suspect Joe was involved. Besides the lies made up by corrupt criminals LINK what evidence is there?
January 22Jan 22 40 minutes ago, toolg said: Besides the lies made up by corrupt criminals LINK what evidence is there? https://oversight.house.gov/blog/evidence-of-joe-bidens-involvement-in-his-familys-influence-peddling-schemes/
Create an account or sign in to comment