21 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

Just looking ahead at FA (not that we have money), and here is a list of Colts FAs. 

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/indianapolis-colts/

With Kelce maybe retiring, look at Joey Hunt ?

9 minutes ago, RLC said:

So we got the HC that no one wanted, but the DC that most teams wanted🤔

Feels like 2016.

2022 SB Champs?!

So green bay loses at home. Is there any hope of Rodgers winning another Super Bowl before he retires?

1 minute ago, greend said:

So green bay loses at home. Is there any hope of Rodgers winning another Super Bowl before he retires?

Sure, he might get traded.

1 minute ago, greend said:

So green bay loses at home. Is there any hope of Rodgers winning another Super Bowl before he retires?

Doubtful at this point. 

38 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

If these mock drafts are right the eagles need to find a way to get back to 10-14 range. 

They truly expect these QB;s to go flying off the board. It'll push Smith/Chase/Waddle to the range. 

Target a Corner back / Line backer in the 2nd. Go O-Line/D-Line in the 3rd

And depending what you get for trading back You look at a tight end in the 2nd/3rd. 

 

No reason the Eagles shouldnt get 3... maybe 4 day 1 starters

 

Steelers fans hate Tom Brady way more then those 2. 

Reason #1 why we won't have 4 day 1 starters

Steichen and Gannon seem qualified, but I think we might have just hit our quota for dorky looking 30 something year old white dudes as coaches.

32 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

Just looking ahead at FA (not that we have money), and here is a list of Colts FAs. 

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/indianapolis-colts/

Yeah, I looked at that list when they announced Siri.  Would love to see Marlon Mack and Malik Hooker come this way.  Mack is realistic on a cheap, prove you're healthy deal.  Hooker is a pipe dream who will cost too much.

Stoutland is staying. I am content.

13 minutes ago, RLC said:

Sure, he might get traded.

 

13 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said:

Doubtful at this point. 

Just goes to show how tough it is even with a good team around you.

 

12 hours ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

If you think you got a legit LT worth taking at 6, you do it. 

Unless he can slide inside his rookie year, I wouldn't justify taking another T in round 1.  With the development of Mailata and the investment made in Dillard (trading up in the 1st), I personally would be livid if they drafted another LT at 6.  And personally, I'd hope he can maybe switch to RT and take over for Lane when he's officially done forever or we trade him.  

14 minutes ago, Ipiggles said:

 

That is a list of a lot of young white dudes.

10 minutes ago, hputenis said:

Unless he can slide inside his rookie year, I wouldn't justify taking another T in round 1.  With the development of Mailata and the investment made in Dillard (trading up in the 1st), I personally would be livid if they drafted another LT at 6.  And personally, I'd hope he can maybe switch to RT and take over for Lane when he's officially done forever or we trade him.  

So like most nitwits in here, I think you’re overvaluing Mailata. His development and potential are very good from where he started but he’s from sniffing even a reserve pro bowl spot. 
 

I’m stealing this from someone else who said this months ago. Mailata went from a 0-5, but the number 6 overall pick would come on as a 7 or 8 at the very least. 
 

And if you’re that high on Mailata... Dillard should get traded anyway. 

You know I personally don't care what color any of my coaches are. Players either for that matter.

2 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

So like most nitwits in here, I think you’re overvaluing Mailata. His development and potential are very good from where he started but he’s from sniffing even a reserve pro bowl spot. 
 

I’m stealing this from someone else who said this months ago. Mailata went from a 0-5, but the number 6 overall pick would come on as a 7 or 8 at the very least. 
 

And if you’re that high on Mailata... Dillard should get traded anyway. 

No, I'm not.  Not even a little bit.  If things go the way I hope they do, he would be our swing tackle next year with Dillard starting.  Mailata proved to be a decent LT and was hardly the problem on the OL this season.  He made some mistakes, but he proved he can play.  Not every spot will be pro bowl worthy, so if he can get the job done, that's fine for me as a swing T.  

We have zero WRs on this roster at the moment that have proven they can actually make plays.  Possibly Reagor.  Nobody else.  

Just now, hputenis said:

No, I'm not.  Not even a little bit.  If things go the way I hope they do, he would be our swing tackle next year with Dillard starting.  Mailata proved to be a decent LT and was hardly the problem on the OL this season.  He made some mistakes, but he proved he can play.  Not every spot will be pro bowl worthy, so if he can get the job done, that's fine for me as a swing T.  

We have zero WRs on this roster at the moment that have proven they can actually make plays.  Possibly Reagor.  Nobody else.  

And hopefully the love affair with Jason Peters is over

14 minutes ago, Sturm said:

That is a list of a lot of young white dudes.

And?

14 minutes ago, Sturm said:

That is a list of a lot of young white dudes.

6 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

So like most nitwits in here, I think you’re overvaluing Mailata. His development and potential are very good from where he started but he’s from sniffing even a reserve pro bowl spot. 
 

I’m stealing this from someone else who said this months ago. Mailata went from a 0-5, but the number 6 overall pick would come on as a 7 or 8 at the very least. 
 

And if you’re that high on Mailata... Dillard should get traded anyway. 

Care to explain how you see him? Most in here think he can be a starting tackle, and some think he could be a Pro Bowler. His ceiling is as high as any draft pick you could take at #6. He's also only 23 years old. 

I like the staff so far. I do think we need to add someone with HC experience. Still rooting for Jim Caldwell to get the Assistant HC job, but feel that he'd get an OC job somewhere (with Frazier in Houston?)

2 minutes ago, greend said:

And hopefully the love affair with Jason Peters is over

If there is so much as a report that leaks out that the Eagles might possibly bring him back, I'll have to buy a new laptop since I will have smashed this one.  

3 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

Care to explain how you see him? Most in here think he can be a starting tackle, and some think he could be a Pro Bowler. His ceiling is as high as any draft pick you could take at #6. He's also only 23 years old. 

His ceiling is high and I loved the pick. But any pick at 6 is more likely to be a sure thing. 

1 minute ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

His ceiling is high and I loved the pick. But any pick at 6 is more likely to be a sure thing. 

But we've seen Mailata and he has shown an ability to at worst be a serviceable starter. At most, sky is the limit. Any pick at 6, regardless of what they may be, has an unknown floor. Mailata's floor is known at this point, IMO. 

7 minutes ago, hputenis said:

No, I'm not.  Not even a little bit.  If things go the way I hope they do, he would be our swing tackle next year with Dillard starting.  Mailata proved to be a decent LT and was hardly the problem on the OL this season.  He made some mistakes, but he proved he can play.  Not every spot will be pro bowl worthy, so if he can get the job done, that's fine for me as a swing T.  

We have zero WRs on this roster at the moment that have proven they can actually make plays.  Possibly Reagor.  Nobody else.  

Dillard starting doesn’t exactly defend not going LT at pick 6. 
 

Mailata looked decent compared to Pryor but that’s about it. 
 

I’m with you at WR but using Dillard and/or Mailata as the reason LT shouldn’t be addressed isn’t a very good reason. That’s all I’m saying