2 minutes ago, Gannan said:

It's because she's a democrat who criticizes the president. There are pedos, sex offenders, and thieves in your party that arent being investigated at all.

But its fine for me if they find out her brother did marry her to become a citizen.

It's stupid for me if they don't find anything

4 hours ago, Seventy_Yard_FG said:

But she could easily publish a blood test and the matter would rest

I have seen a lot of dumb takes on EMB but this one is up there

11 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

its indigenous peoples' day

On 10/12/2026 at 3:54 PM, Seventy_Yard_FG said:

But its fine for me if they find out her brother did marry her to become a citizen.

It's stupid for me if they don't find anything

Citizens aren't required to answer for unfounded allegations from the state.

Why do you hate America?

On 10/12/2026 at 2:27 PM, Seventy_Yard_FG said:

Depends if they find anything. Why is it so hard to find out whether the man alleged was her brother or not?

This administration is pretty much batting 0'fer on everything. So while it's certainly possible that there's actually something credible being investigated, the odds are that this is likely another baseless case just like so many of the others that have been dismissed.

5 hours ago, Phillyterp85 said:

This administration is pretty much batting 0'fer on everything. So while it's certainly possible that there's actually something credible being investigated, the odds are that this is likely another baseless case just like so many of the others that have been dismissed.

All about hassling the other party, costing them in huge legal fees, and making their lives miserable. Trump's way of sending in a thug to threaten to break a finger or two.

3 hours ago, DrPhilly said:

All about hassling the other party, costing them in huge legal fees, and making their lives miserable. Trump's way of sending in a thug to threaten to break a finger or two.

There's literally an amendment that is supposed to prevent the state from acting in this way.

Unpatriotic statists happily shred the Constitution when the government is illegally searching citizens from the other party, then pretend as though they're the "real Americans" when the show is on the other foot.

One silver lining here is that dingus has been beating the drum for years about her stealing millions by leveraging her position in congress. Now they've blasted pictured her basic ass house with a Toyota Camry in the driveway on every TV channel.

1 hour ago, DEagle7 said:

One silver lining here is that dingus has been beating the drum for years about her stealing millions by leveraging her position in congress. Now they've blasted pictured her basic ass house with a Toyota Camry in the driveway on every TV channel.

She’s one of those smart criminals. Keeping a low profile and hoarding all that ill gotten cash. 💰💰💰💰💰

thank god trump did away with lawfare.

8 hours ago, DrPhilly said:

All about hassling the other party, costing them in huge legal fees, and making their lives miserable. Trump's way of sending in a thug to threaten to break a finger or two.

Even if so, remember Russia gate? The other side does it too

14 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

Citizens aren't required to answer for unfounded allegations from the state.

Why do you hate America?

They’re not unfounded though. There was a warrant. So the allegation is warranted

20 minutes ago, Seventy_Yard_FG said:

They’re not unfounded though. There was a warrant. So the allegation is warranted

It's entirely unfounded. Baseless accusations have been levied for years. Nothing has come of it until weeks before the election.

This is what weaponization of the DOJ actually looks like.

You just don't care because it's being weaponized against Dems and only Dems.

Meanwhile Trump endorses corrupt crooks like Paxton and not a word.

24 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

It's entirely unfounded. Baseless accusations have been levied for years. Nothing has come of it until weeks before the election.

This is what weaponization of the DOJ actually looks like.

You just don't care because it's being weaponized against Dems and only Dems.

Meanwhile Trump endorses corrupt crooks like Paxton and not a word.

Right but even the DOJ had to get a search warrant from a neutral judicial branch judge

You’re right though, I care less because it was done to candidates I liked (Eg Russia Russia Russia)

10 minutes ago, Seventy_Yard_FG said:

Right but even the DOJ had to get a search warrant from a neutral judicial branch judge

You’re right though, I care less because it was done to candidates I liked (Eg Russia Russia Russia)

The "russia russia russia" investigation resulted in multiple convictions and guilty pleas. So not really a baseless witchhunt. Not the same as arresting someone for vandalizing the Lincoln pool only for it to be completely made up BS. Not the same as trying to get an indictment against Letitia James and failing multiple times. Not the same as charging Comey with felonies only for them to be dismissed.

Like I said, maybe THIS time there actually is something there, but the Trump administration has an abysmal track record with this stuff, so they certainly don't deserve the benefit of the doubt.

13 minutes ago, Seventy_Yard_FG said:

Right but even the DOJ had to get a search warrant from a neutral judicial branch judge

You’re right though, I care less because it was done to candidates I liked (Eg Russia Russia Russia)

And Paul Manafort was indicted and convicted.

You LIKE Manafort?

22 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said:

The "russia russia russia" investigation resulted in multiple convictions and guilty pleas. So not really a baseless witchhunt. Not the same as arresting someone for vandalizing the Lincoln pool only for it to be completely made up BS. Not the same as trying to get an indictment against Letitia James and failing multiple times. Not the same as charging Comey with felonies only for them to be dismissed.

Like I said, maybe THIS time there actually is something there, but the Trump administration has an abysmal track record with this stuff, so they certainly don't deserve the benefit of the doubt.

Not for rigging the election with Russia

We literally *just* saw new evidence that Russia continues to interfere with our elections with the data center bombing. Not even remotely comparable situations dud c'mon now. Don't be silly.

17 minutes ago, Seventy_Yard_FG said:

Not for rigging the election with Russia

The investigation kicked off when credible allegations of interference surfaced? The election where the DNC was hacked by Russia and emails were leaked with the intent to damage Hillary's campaign? When Papadopoulos revealed to an Australian diplomat the Russian had dirt on Hillary?

That one?

What evidence is there that Ilhan committed immigration fraud? The affidavit is sealed. Zero evidence has been made public. She's been in office for almost 8 years, and nothing?

You're a patsy.

10 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:

We literally *just* saw new evidence that Russia continues to interfere with our elections with the data center bombing. Not even remotely comparable situations dud c'mon now. Don't be silly.

Go easy on him. He's grieving the death of his Russia bot friends. It's been tough out there on social media for MAGA since those data centers were taken out.

6 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

The investigation kicked off when credible allegations of interference surfaced? The election where the DNC was hacked by Russia and emails were leaked with the intent to damage Hillary's campaign? When Papadopoulos revealed to an Australian diplomat the Russian had dirt on Hillary?

That one?

What evidence is there that Ilhan committed immigration fraud? The affidavit is sealed. Zero evidence has been made public. She's been in office for almost 8 years, and nothing?

You're a patsy.

Didn’t all of the evidence that Russia hacked at all come from Crowdstrike, a firm the DNC hired, not a neutral investigation firm?

Still not evidence Trump had anything to do with it.

2 hours ago, Seventy_Yard_FG said:

Even if so, remember Russia gate? The other side does it too

You are comparing apples and oranges. The Trump led DOJ suits have just simply not even provided any real evidence and there are no actual serious debates on the merits of the cases, 100s of them. The Jack Smith case about the election is highly debated by serious legal scholars with the majority feeling the case has real merit.

1 minute ago, Seventy_Yard_FG said:

Didn’t all of the evidence that Russia hacked at all come from Crowdstrike, a firm the DNC hired, not a neutral investigation firm?

Still not evidence Trump had anything to do with it.

They were verified. And Trump was never a target of the investigation despite claims.

But people still bought into the victim complex.

Trump 100% did take classified information and store it in insecure locations (including the infamous bathroom) in Mar a Lago for 18 months despite repeated requests to return it. A criminal act he was probably guilty of that was far worse than anything Hillary was ever accused of, accusations that had no evidence.

But it's cool. I'm sure Ilhan is super guilty.

Just not as guilty as the average Republican politician.