Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The Eagles Message Board

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

13 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Ehhh.... he went to my high school... saw him play in 11th grade vs Swift's team.  Dude made a couple of phenomenal catches. I think I might have dibs on that one. 

OK it's official now

  • Replies 89.6k
  • Views 2.5m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

2 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

OK it's official now

You gotta me one " I called it"  but in fairness I didn't follow him at Florida, and didn't mention him like you did. Pitts abd Jefferson are in your column for the official stats 😆

1 hour ago, joemas6 said:

You gotta me one " I called it"  but in fairness I didn't follow him at Florida, and didn't mention him like you did. Pitts abd Jefferson are in your column for the official stats 😆

I have no score sheet, nor printout spreadsheet. Liked him for us,but other needs. Goedert is a fine TE,adding Pitts would just split the stats and giving up both round 1 picks for him would certainly be the most "ignorant" move in recent years. I'm fine with a nice blocking TE2 who can catch clutch passes in  a pinch. if Atl under uses him,that's their own problem. I took him in fantasy and DID expect more from him. Maybe he is slow to grasp the pro system,who knows? I'm still after Murphy in this next draft if I'm Howie. I was reading about how difficult it is for a LT to learn RT. IDK why they can't list them as LT or RT when you look at mock draft boards,so you have to bring up each guy to see where he played. very time consuming. Changing spots isn't a cakewalk,so I have been looking at OT's who have played the right side as an heir for Lane,but there aren't many of these floating around next draft. We usually find some "no name" but as of now we have 4 decently high picks and 2 7ths which aren't worth much. IDK I would try to keep the secondary we have. It's a pretty impressive group. Age is a factor but it's not like we can't sift through others to find decent BU's,so basically looking at 4 picks here. It is suggested we pick at 6(using that useless SOS) to roughly figure NO record at the end. So if that improves to pick 4,I can see a trade back to 6,get Murph and add more draft capital. Even if we don't, Murph at 6 is my pick. Hard to know if we decide to retain Sanders and Scott. I think we will,that would free up having to draft a RB unless the value is so great it can't be bypassed. I would like to see one of those young secondary players(CB or S) as the late 1/early 2. That's all the farther I have gone. No need to plan things out, WAY too soon,but those are the picks I would like to see right now. Hurts will be signed,he made big strides and should keep getting better,so I think QB is off the table now. I am a little surprised we don't see much from Quez/Pascal this year. I suppose that's a good sign if they aren't needed. Since Shew will go away,I think we wait around and pick up another teams cuts when THEY draft a top QB,let Shew test around to see if he can start much like we did Foles. No need to be the "bad guys" here. 4 QB's going top 10 wouldn't surprise me

I'm not looking at all for next year yet.  I've been thinking for the last couple of years how our DL is going to need to be replaced in bulk.   

  • Author
5 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

What's "ignorant" about reality? You saw "air Coryelle" in Hurts? Not our fault you deny reality that's on you. Ignorance is ignoring what your eyes are telling you

Showed you break down after breakdown  of Hurts going to his second and third reads. After audibly to a better play to start. Super critical of the 22 year old pro. But your loving how the 25 year old in college is doing less. Just your talking point agenda pushing.

Can't go wrong with either line. Always nice to keep draftin 1-2 on either side every draft IMO...

5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Showed you break down after breakdown  of Hurts going to his second and third reads. After audibly to a better play to start. Super critical of the 22 year old pro. But your loving how the 25 year old in college is doing less. Just your talking point agenda pushing.

Twisting yet again(I'm used to it) so 2nd and 3rd down reads are 30 yard passes? Has NOTHING to do with what I am talking about, NOTHING. I guess you cannot COMPREHEND subject matter??? DO you ever recall what the topic was or just wing yourself into oblivion trying to prove another non provable point that has ZERO to do with what's being talked about? What do 3rd down reads have to do with seeing what Hurts attributes are(or lacks of) Yep,not a damn thing,yet here we are off on another subject entirely because you lack comprehension skills. yes we ALL know  age 24 is a leader and at 25 you are washed up,you've already made that ridiculous NON FACTUAL claim many times. But keep spewing your BS,it just makes you look foolish

6 hours ago, joemas6 said:

I'm not looking at all for next year yet.  I've been thinking for the last couple of years how our DL is going to need to be replaced in bulk.   

NP Just looking at what I feel would be the "places to go" The 2 7 picks arent really worth anything,so as of now that leaves 4 picks 1,1,2,3,so it's good they are HIGH picks because still stand at minimum to get 4 good players in. So for me, thinking Edge,ROT,CB,S would be the 4 to look for(any order). I put them in this order because it's my personal choice but i tried to "think like Howie",so the linemen came first. A 2,3 CB/S would be something Howie may do,but I still don't see either as a round 1 for Howie. We should have LT down(Mail) Kelces replacement is in the building, LG looks ok, RG looks fair,but we suffer when Lane is out.

25 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Super critical of the 22 year old pro.

Shouldn't you be more critical of the PRO, who has a few years in, you are going to pay 150 million dollars to???? Apples to oranges here AGAIN and once again you take what i said as bashing which you STILL DO NOT UNDERSTAND and completely off the topic of discussion(again not surprising). I understand the guy I chose when he was NOBODY,(maybe round 7 then)who has accelerated into the Heisman discussion bothers you, but once again it's facts and I "called it" LOL. Yet somehow this translates into I am a hater, I have no clue what to look for in a QB,I choose "undraftable" guys, I can't see what Hurts does with my own eyes, and I should be on medication HAHAHAHAHA (OMG this is a riot)

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Showed you break down after breakdown  of Hurts going to his second and third reads. After audibly to a better play to start. Super critical of the 22 year old pro. But your loving how the 25 year old in college is doing less. Just your talking point agenda pushing.

So making 3rd down reads translates into "air Coryelle" OK got it(no I don't)

  • Author
On 11/11/2022 at 9:01 AM, GreenbleedinNC said:

OH you picked up another "boy"? I called him before anyone else(and 93 was right there with me) lmao,but glad you are taking the credit,someone has to

Lost your mind. I was clearly way ahead on that one. You checked him out when I brought it up and you loved him though.

13 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Shouldn't you be more critical of the PRO, who has a few years in, you are going to pay 150 million dollars to???? Apples to oranges here AGAIN and once again you take what i said as bashing which you STILL DO NOT UNDERSTAND and completely off the topic of discussion(again not surprising). I understand the guy I chose when he was NOBODY,(maybe round 7 then)who has accelerated into the Heisman discussion bothers you, but once again it's facts and I "called it" LOL. Yet somehow this translates into I am a hater, I have no clue what to look for in a QB,I choose "undraftable" guys, I can't see what Hurts does with my own eyes, and I should be on medication HAHAHAHAHA (OMG this is a riot)

MVP

  • Author
13 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Twisting yet again(I'm used to it) so 2nd and 3rd down reads are 30 yard passes? Has NOTHING to do with what I am talking about, NOTHING. I guess you cannot COMPREHEND subject matter??? DO you ever recall what the topic was or just wing yourself into oblivion trying to prove another non provable point that has ZERO to do with what's being talked about? What do 3rd down reads have to do with seeing what Hurts attributes are(or lacks of) Yep,not a damn thing,yet here we are off on another subject entirely because you lack comprehension skills. yes we ALL know  age 24 is a leader and at 25 you are washed up,you've already made that ridiculous NON FACTUAL claim many times. But keep spewing your BS,it just makes you look foolish

I said he was going through his progression. One two and third read. Didn’t say anything about downs. That’s on you.

On 11/11/2022 at 9:01 AM, GreenbleedinNC said:

OH you picked up another "boy"? I called him before anyone else(and 93 was right there with me) lmao,but glad you are taking the credit,someone has to

BS

This revisionist history is laughable on here.

  • Author

Stine did say he saw him. But that was after I pointed him out as unbelievable and wanted him. He was back at like 20 at that time. So we had a shot. But then he climbed all the way up. So we traded back and traded up and gt Devonta

We all agreed on Pitts but that was after I posted highlights 

  • Author

You guys argue and argue against me for months about running the ball. Then comeback and claim my thoughts. Laughable!

  • Author

Think you guys caught on about running the ball after the whole Linc crowd was chanting run the damn ball

13 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So making 3rd down reads translates into "air Coryelle" OK got it(no I don't)

I said second and third reads. Nothing about downs. Reread please.

  • Author
13 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Shouldn't you be more critical of the PRO, who has a few years in, you are going to pay 150 million dollars to???? Apples to oranges here AGAIN and once again you take what i said as bashing which you STILL DO NOT UNDERSTAND and completely off the topic of discussion(again not surprising). I understand the guy I chose when he was NOBODY,(maybe round 7 then)who has accelerated into the Heisman discussion bothers you, but once again it's facts and I "called it" LOL. Yet somehow this translates into I am a hater, I have no clue what to look for in a QB,I choose "undraftable" guys, I can't see what Hurts does with my own eyes, and I should be on medication HAHAHAHAHA (OMG this is a riot)

I don’t root for College Tennessee. So really makes little difference to me.

In college. I said I didn’t see him with much for the pros. Completely different animal. Come back to me in a few years about this one.

  • Author
On 11/11/2022 at 8:57 AM, GreenbleedinNC said:

What's "ignorant" about reality? You saw "air Coryelle" in Hurts? Not our fault you deny reality that's on you. Ignorance is ignoring what your eyes are telling you

My eyes seem to be the only ones I king up these details. First year starting….how many guys get into fourth reads? He’s been learning and getting better the whole time. Pay attention. Take notes. Your BS one read and run was always BS hater-aide

  • Author
On 11/11/2022 at 7:13 AM, stine said:

Well, Seeing as Adams was only around for half of Rodgers career, I guess he gave him nothing for part of it. Basically we are talking about 2016-2021 as Adams was not putting up those eye popping numbers until then....

I think you made a great point and kind of realized my point in doing so.

  • Author

FL you should watch NFL some instead of always college. Pitts wasn’t slow nothing. Went for over 1,000 yards rookie year with Matt Ryan. He’s a TE….but just as easily be considered a WR. Sick weapon! You are lost. No reason to not want Pitts(period).

  • Author
21 hours ago, joemas6 said:

You gotta me one " I called it"  but in fairness I didn't follow him at Florida, and didn't mention him like you did. Pitts abd Jefferson are in your column for the official stats 😆

BS. Jefferson only…and26 year old rookies.

21 hours ago, joemas6 said:

You gotta me one " I called it"  but in fairness I didn't follow him at Florida, and didn't mention him like you did. Pitts abd Jefferson are in your column for the official stats 😆

Nobody pays any attention around here. Just assume if the guy is a stud…I was on it!

  • Author
20 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I have no score sheet, nor printout spreadsheet. Liked him for us,but other needs. Goedert is a fine TE,adding Pitts would just split the stats and giving up both round 1 picks for him would certainly be the most "ignorant" move in recent years. I'm fine with a nice blocking TE2 who can catch clutch passes in  a pinch. if Atl under uses him,that's their own problem. I took him in fantasy and DID expect more from him. Maybe he is slow to grasp the pro system,who knows? I'm still after Murphy in this next draft if I'm Howie. I was reading about how difficult it is for a LT to learn RT. IDK why they can't list them as LT or RT when you look at mock draft boards,so you have to bring up each guy to see where he played. very time consuming. Changing spots isn't a cakewalk,so I have been looking at OT's who have played the right side as an heir for Lane,but there aren't many of these floating around next draft. We usually find some "no name" but as of now we have 4 decently high picks and 2 7ths which aren't worth much. IDK I would try to keep the secondary we have. It's a pretty impressive group. Age is a factor but it's not like we can't sift through others to find decent BU's,so basically looking at 4 picks here. It is suggested we pick at 6(using that useless SOS) to roughly figure NO record at the end. So if that improves to pick 4,I can see a trade back to 6,get Murph and add more draft capital. Even if we don't, Murph at 6 is my pick. Hard to know if we decide to retain Sanders and Scott. I think we will,that would free up having to draft a RB unless the value is so great it can't be bypassed. I would like to see one of those young secondary players(CB or S) as the late 1/early 2. That's all the farther I have gone. No need to plan things out, WAY too soon,but those are the picks I would like to see right now. Hurts will be signed,he made big strides and should keep getting better,so I think QB is off the table now. I am a little surprised we don't see much from Quez/Pascal this year. I suppose that's a good sign if they aren't needed. Since Shew will go away,I think we wait around and pick up another teams cuts when THEY draft a top QB,let Shew test around to see if he can start much like we did Foles. No need to be the "bad guys" here. 4 QB's going top 10 wouldn't surprise me

Pitts immediatly picked up pro ball like a ba4a22!

 Shew isn’t getting a starting gig. So maybe he stays on a good  team. 

Good to see your looking into my advice on Oline. Makes plenty of sense.

Anderson and Carter right now still for me
 

 

  • Author

The Secondary we have are mostly FA. Going to get huge money. Top compensatory picks though.

  • Author
20 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I have no score sheet, nor printout spreadsheet. Liked him for us,but other needs. Goedert is a fine TE,adding Pitts would just split the stats and giving up both round 1 picks for him would certainly be the most "ignorant" move in recent years. I'm fine with a nice blocking TE2 who can catch clutch passes in  a pinch. if Atl under uses him,that's their own problem. I took him in fantasy and DID expect more from him. Maybe he is slow to grasp the pro system,who knows? I'm still after Murphy in this next draft if I'm Howie. I was reading about how difficult it is for a LT to learn RT. IDK why they can't list them as LT or RT when you look at mock draft boards,so you have to bring up each guy to see where he played. very time consuming. Changing spots isn't a cakewalk,so I have been looking at OT's who have played the right side as an heir for Lane,but there aren't many of these floating around next draft. We usually find some "no name" but as of now we have 4 decently high picks and 2 7ths which aren't worth much. IDK I would try to keep the secondary we have. It's a pretty impressive group. Age is a factor but it's not like we can't sift through others to find decent BU's,so basically looking at 4 picks here. It is suggested we pick at 6(using that useless SOS) to roughly figure NO record at the end. So if that improves to pick 4,I can see a trade back to 6,get Murph and add more draft capital. Even if we don't, Murph at 6 is my pick. Hard to know if we decide to retain Sanders and Scott. I think we will,that would free up having to draft a RB unless the value is so great it can't be bypassed. I would like to see one of those young secondary players(CB or S) as the late 1/early 2. That's all the farther I have gone. No need to plan things out, WAY too soon,but those are the picks I would like to see right now. Hurts will be signed,he made big strides and should keep getting better,so I think QB is off the table now. I am a little surprised we don't see much from Quez/Pascal this year. I suppose that's a good sign if they aren't needed. Since Shew will go away,I think we wait around and pick up another teams cuts when THEY draft a top QB,let Shew test around to see if he can start much like we did Foles. No need to be the "bad guys" here. 4 QB's going top 10 wouldn't surprise me

Nice that you agreed on paying Hurts now…got it in before Thanksgiving even. I knew you’d catch up. Of coarse paying him isn’t a question. Does he have a real shot at MVP is now the question? He’s odds favorite at a couple sites.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.