44 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I like him being a little pissed and angry…something to prove. Well he’s got Ward a big time corner to face now. So he’s gotta show it against a top notch guy. A guy used to playing against physical WR. Plays Metcalf and others several times

If it did nobody would draft defenders, right?

LMAO ,right, I guess, because D has ZERO to do with how many PPG your OFFENSE scores

38 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Just stated that in counter to Big Ben and Antonio Brown. Pro Bowl really doesn’t relate to coach ability. FL…you missing it here

Were Big Ben and AB pro bowlers?

37 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We needed 32?

And if your bar is the giants…to me that’s pretty pathetic. I predicted a complete beat down. Completely overmatched them.

Thanks,so 32 PPG is indeed possible,which you denied for pages(can't be done)

38 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We are playing at home as the top seed. Nobody in the league got 32 points per game. We have a top D. Glad we invested in D. Great pass D when healthy. Getting sacks more than everybody. Love the whole team package. Take that over lopsided O just to create shootouts always trying to score 32 every week. No real significance to me.

Nope 32 is the GOAL, which you still fail to understand. IDK else how to explain what a goal is LOL. It doesn't mean you reach it,it's something to shoot for

27 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I don’t remotely expect to score 32 against Santa Clara

We shouldn’t need to

IDK,but if we did, it would be hard to lose the game

26 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So we have our OC and DC interviewing big time for HC jobs to leave. But also have our QB coach being considered for OC jobs. Our Secondary coach is a possible DC candidate as well.

Really looks like we are facing the aftermath of our Super Season coaching situation again

To be expected

43 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

One again 32 PPG has ZERO to do with defense= ZERO

Exactly my point, thank you. It really doesn’t have much to do with team or matchups either. Just a random goal of scoring more than any team has for the last several seasons. 

46 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

If he's not going to be a team player and threaten to be a big, whiny, baby, yes

So you running every great athlete away that isn’t the strongest character and intangibles person?

44 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So you're paying the 8-10 mil for Sanders. Nice to know.

A Training camp body has zero to do with whether we pay our starting us all I said

45 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So you're paying the 8-10 mil for Sanders. Nice to know.

I see the personnel situation as big picture. Gotta put a whole team together. So gotta be flexible and look and all the hundred ways to construct the roster

I prefer getting guys cheap. Or getting good value at least. But you need to balance that with all factors. Did we overpay forget Davis in the draft? I’d say very much so. But we needed that piece. How else you get a Nose?

So every position effects whether I pay Sanders. On top of the whole RB situation this offseason. 

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

A Training camp body has zero to do with whether we pay our starting us all I said

SO then why worry?. Still we have to think about 'what if" Sanders is not here. Howie's job is to check out ptential additions to make the eam batter. maybe this guys beats out RB 4? Who know,but Howie is doing the job he is paid to do

We’ve been very much light on Sanders workload. He has been used so sparingly in college and NFL. So I see him just now hitting his prime. The team hasn’t just used him up like Zeke. They’ve conserved him. So he’s definitely an option to resign. Wants to stay here also.

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I see the personnel situation as big picture. Gotta put a whole team together. So gotta be flexible and look and all the hundred ways to construct the roster

And that's what Howie is doing?

Sanders is the cheapest starter to retain basically. Him and Epps.

48 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So which is it? You have now stated both sides of it. if he continues to disrupt what do you do? make a decision. I'm with ASG it was a bad look and he needs to fix it

I’m not overreacting. 

7 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Exactly my point, thank you. It really doesn’t have much to do with team or matchups either. Just a random goal of scoring more than any team has for the last several seasons. 

So you running every great athlete away that isn’t the strongest character and intangibles person?

Are they "great athletes" if they disrupt everyone else on the team? Make the coach look bad and question his play calling? Me me me??? Yeah I don't need/ want guys like that. I'm not game planning around AJ-period

50 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

What's laughable is you don't see Howie making moves to lose Sanders if he is too high priced. All these guys can be cut,so what's the problem with looking at them??? 3rd RBBC guy has what 5 carries  a game? We need a superstar for that?

These guys not on anybodies rosters aren’t starter replacements. That’s what you aren’t realizing. Sermon is taking Sanders job. He isn’t even dressing.

Every guy on the PS here to replace AJ also?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Sanders is the cheapest starter to retain basically. Him and Epps.

I’m not overreacting. 

Yet you put words in my mouth and assume I want to tun him out of town lol.(where did I say this?) 

52 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

What's laughable is you don't see Howie making moves to lose Sanders if he is too high priced. All these guys can be cut,so what's the problem with looking at them??? 3rd RBBC guy has what 5 carries  a game? We need a superstar for that?

We didn’t have a committee. It was Sanders and friends

Sanders was an elite rusher this year. Second and third RB fir us weren’t committee. Breathers. Pass downs. In big blowouts they got their time.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

These guys not on anybodies rosters aren’t starter replacements. That’s what you aren’t realizing. Sermon is taking Sanders job. He isn’t even dressing.

Every guy on the PS here to replace AJ also?

WHat if thius kid is better than RB 4? You don't replace him? The object is to have the best players at every position,,isn't this your argument for having 3 pro bowl safties?? but this is different?

53 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

What's laughable is you don't see Howie making moves to lose Sanders if he is too high priced. All these guys can be cut,so what's the problem with looking at them??? 3rd RBBC guy has what 5 carries  a game? We need a superstar for that?

How is five carries part of any committee?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

It was Sanders and friends

Isn't that a committee???? Is there a committee head usually? Just because someone is head of the committee makes it a non committee?

50 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMAO ,right, I guess, because D has ZERO to do with how many PPG your OFFENSE scores

No idea what your point is

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

How is five carries part of any committee?

Any contribition makes you part of the team???? Why have them then?

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

No idea what your point is

That's obvious lol

50 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Were Big Ben and AB pro bowlers?

Absolutely. All Pro even. Hall of Famers. Well Brown might have blown that. But their play was there for  sure. 

Antonio was the best WR in the league for years. You don’t remember all that?

51 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Thanks,so 32 PPG is indeed possible,which you denied for pages(can't be done)

I never denied it. Crazy argument you’ve created out of thin air. You just used poor word choice and claimed it was your standard. Like we suck if we don’t do it. I’ve known teams have scored more than that in the past even. All I’ve said is I care more about each game and matchups. Wins is my goal. Team winning. Never said any of that. You arguing with air now.

51 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Nope 32 is the GOAL, which you still fail to understand. IDK else how to explain what a goal is LOL. It doesn't mean you reach it,it's something to shoot for

I never would have said a word against you if you used the word goal. Fine with any goal. Not what you said. Sorry. Your word choice was my only real issue. That’s what you aren’t understanding. Goal I wouldn’t have even blinked much at. Sorry you misunderstood and have gone on and on with your misunderstanding.