Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Lmao we started in round 2 for you to push back to round 5 now love it. 

Is there a safety in round 2 that we need?  All I've seen is a lot of CBs or linemen.  This team better take a CB with one of the 2 top picks.

Round 6 developmental S's-Thompson and Forrest,round 5 Wiggins. All show promise,but not NFL ready yet

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

It is a guide and isn’t law sure but if it was only going to cost me 6ths to move up go get me Wilson from BYU. 
 

It isn’t cheap to move around in the top 10 was the point 

Ask Chicago... how much it cost to move up 1. ..lol.  

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Is there a safety in round 2 that we need?  All I've seen is a lot of CBs or linemen.  This team better take a CB with one of the 2 top picks.

Few S that could fall into round 2 would they grade higher than Cb or OL idk. Would they be equal possibly but yea your taking the CB shocker 

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Round 6 developmental S's-Thompson and Forrest,round 5 Wiggins. All show promise,but not NFL ready yet

Idk, heard Wiggins should go round 4. 

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

It is a guide and isn’t law sure but if it was only going to cost me 6ths to move up go get me Wilson from BYU. 
 

It isn’t cheap to move around in the top 10 was the point 

Also a point, if it's to the advantage of the trade down team and thats the only offer who knows? always worth a try

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Idk, heard Wiggins should go round 4. 

He could. I had him pegged early when he was "off the board" lol

So here's a question. And I dont want "oh I take the best player" because noone knows what this team considers the "best player". At what point do we need to find a starting center and a replacement for Lane? Are we "OK" with the left side of the Oline?. I was looking at my mock. Pretty uncanny that I alternate between O and D(it wasn't planned that way lol)

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

At what point do we need to find a starting center and a replacement for Lane? Are we "OK with the left side of the Oline?. I was looking at my mock. Pretty uncanny that I alternate between O and D(it wasn't planned that way lo

Depends how do we value Driscoll is he a T or a G???? mailata and Dillard??? Dillard wins LT Mailata could be future RT... C is Semaulo our guy do we like Jergia lots of unknowns 

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Few S that could fall into round 2 would they grade higher than Cb or OL idk. Would they be equal possibly but yea your taking the CB shocker 

Right.... nothing at CB.  Can't be more clear, S was already low due to some young options already on the roster.  

If we are going simply positions.  DL would be my preference.  But my fear with this organization,  is they already bump up " draft grades" due to over prioritization of certain positions.   It's why I like the idea of trading down to get that...and the CB.  It seems the skill guys are ranked right where we pick.  Idk that I go there with the young group we already have.   But do we draft a CB or DL at 6 if it seems too early?  

Idk, it's why I agree with you QB is not off the table.  Just feels that it's not going to impact anything getting a skill guy on offense as compared to CB or DL?   

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Depends how do we value Driscoll is he a T or a G???? mailata and Dillard??? Dillard wins LT Mailata could be future RT... C is Semaulo our guy do we like Jergia lots of unknowns 

Yeah really, thats why I have no clue how they feel. I mean a guy like Wyatt (OSU) is a top OG, would we go there? IDK  I really like Hutcherson(S.Carolina) for us late,but he's all over the map on boards lol

7 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Right.... nothing at CB.  Can't be more clear, S was already low due to some young options already on the roster.  

If we are going simply positions.  DL would be my preference.  But my fear with this organization,  is they already bump up " draft grades" due to over prioritization of certain positions.   It's why I like the idea of trading down to get that...and the CB.  It seems the skill guys are ranked right where we pick.  Idk that I go there with the young group we already have.   But do we draft a CB or DL at 6 if it seems too early?  

Idk, it's why I agree with you QB is not off the table.  Just feels that it's not going to impact anything getting a skill guy on offense as compared to CB or DL?   

IDK, it's just Pitts is such a WEAPON on offense. I'm sure other teams see it too. For me the first 4 picks re imperative. I assume we can improve on a lackluster(ok SUCK) 4 game win season,so this is a rare chance for us in the top 10. I would prefer to use later picks to move into 4 where there are still starting caliber players at some position. SO when is Ertz released Friday?

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So here's a question. And I dont want "oh I take the best player" because noone knows what this team considers the "best player". At what point do we need to find a starting center and a replacement for Lane? Are we "OK" with the left side of the Oline?. I was looking at my mock. Pretty uncanny that I alternate between O and D(it wasn't planned that way lol)

It's where I would love to see Herbig and Driscoll play this year.  I don't like the awkward spot our OL is in.  2 young guys compete at LT, 2 other young guys sit.  But what is the future of Kelce, Brooks and Lane?

How does a line like...  Dillard, Seumalo, Driscoll, Herbig and Mailata  sound?   Play that from start to finish and see what you have, they get to gel together.   And you can see who belongs and who doesn't.    

I get the idea of replacing Kelce, but seems like we could have multiple options already on the roster.  That's why I am just hoping we see a lot of defense with this draft.  

8 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Right.... nothing at CB.  Can't be more clear, S was already low due to some young options already on the roster.  

If we are going simply positions.  DL would be my preference.  But my fear with this organization,  is they already bump up " draft grades" due to over prioritization of certain positions.   It's why I like the idea of trading down to get that...and the CB.  It seems the skill guys are ranked right where we pick.  Idk that I go there with the young group we already have.   But do we draft a CB or DL at 6 if it seems too early?  

Idk, it's why I agree with you QB is not off the table.  Just feels that it's not going to impact anything getting a skill guy on offense as compared to CB or DL?   

FOr me a QB at 6 would be a waste of 2 years, while we are rebuilding. I would rather have a more solid team in place before tossing a rook into this dumpster fire. Let Hurts play,take whatever lumps we have coming,build the roster and decide after this season is over

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

It's where I would love to see Herbig and Driscoll play this year.  I don't like the awkward spot our OL is in.  2 young guys compete at LT, 2 other young guys sit.  But what is the future of Kelce, Brooks and Lane?

How does a line like...  Dillard, Seumalo, Driscoll, Herbig and Mailata  sound?   Play that from start to finish and see what you have, they get to gel together.   And you can see who belongs and who doesn't.    

I get the idea of replacing Kelce, but seems like we could have multiple options already on the roster.  That's why I am just hoping we see a lot of defense with this draft.  

yeah,but see if we draft a QB,then it's pointless if there are ?'s about the capability of the Oline. So that's what I'm thinking about. A TOP LOG or ROG who can start day 1 sounds great,but would we go there? IDK how we feel about the Oline. I said ALL last year,put guys in and LEAVE THEM THERE,which we refused to do. Doing that you could have identified the weakest link,now we have no clue who plays well with others

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

IDK, it's just Pitts is such a WEAPON on offense. I'm sure other teams see it too. For me the first 4 picks re imperative. I assume we can improve on a lackluster(ok SUCK) 4 game win season,so this is a rare chance for us in the top 10. I would prefer to use later picks to move into 4 where there are still starting caliber players at some position. SO when is Ertz released Friday?

Maybe trade Ertz, a 5th to move up two spots?

Just now, stine said:

Maybe trade Ertz, a 5th to move up two spots?

Does Ertz have that value anymore???? Seems to me he isn’t worth much at this point 

9 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Depends how do we value Driscoll is he a T or a G???? mailata and Dillard??? Dillard wins LT Mailata could be future RT... C is Semaulo our guy do we like Jergia lots of unknowns 

This 100%   I think 2021 should be used to figure this out... but it's awkward because that would mean not playing Kelce, Brooks and Lane... 3 guys arguably the best at their spots.   I don't like being in this stage.   Would be different if either I didn't like the young guys or the older dudes weren't as good.   Or if we were a contender, this would be absolutely ideal. Tough to sit these kids.

3 minutes ago, stine said:

Maybe trade Ertz, a 5th to move up two spots?

I think teams are waiting for us to release him, I think the trade window has passed

4 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

This 100%   I think 2021 should be used to figure this out... but it's awkward because that would mean not playing Kelce, Brooks and Lane... 3 guys arguably the best at their spots.   I don't like being in this stage.   Would be different if either I didn't like the young guys or the older dudes weren't as good.   Or if we were a contender, this would be absolutely ideal. Tough to sit these kids.

Well we should have lots of ops at garbage time for those young guys lol

We also need to address RB. Sanders and Scott are fine, the rest dont impress me at all

WHO snags Ertz could also be an indicator of what that teams draft options would be. For me the Pitts pick all hinges on ATL. Carolina could move to 4,or stay put for their QB

10 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Does Ertz have that value anymore???? Seems to me he isn’t worth much at this point 

Probably not, but if he is still on the team on draft day, he may be worth something to someone who needs a TE and does not think one is available in the draft other than Pitts....

41 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

This is why(for me) there is no rush to sign a FA WR. You can argue about "vet presence",but thats why you have coaches. get me a nice solid round 3 WR and I'm fine.I dont need no stinkin vet presence

 

I agree, I'm not signing a free agent WR either. 

18 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

FOr me a QB at 6 would be a waste of 2 years, while we are rebuilding. I would rather have a more solid team in place before tossing a rook into this dumpster fire. Let Hurts play,take whatever lumps we have coming,build the roster and decide after this season is over

True... I'm there myself.  But BG makes the good point.... just have to look at Eagles history.  Can't rule out QB at 6.