January 19, 20224 yr On 1/10/2022 at 4:56 PM, nipples said: Depending on how free agency shakes out, I wouldn’t even be mad at using one of the first on a WR. Sucks to do it a third year in a row but right now they have a #1 in smith, a 3 in Watkins… and that’s it. If prefer if they could manage to land a good vet like Godwin, but barring that scenario I’d be OK with WR in the first. I actually think that it is a good idea to address a WR with the 2nd pick. But!!! Howie will be doing the picking..and right away it turns into a bad idea. They need a guy opposite Smith, but can Howie pick one? I have doubts.
May 3, 20223 yr Author On 1/19/2022 at 9:00 AM, Traveler Vic said: I actually think that it is a good idea to address a WR with the 2nd pick. But!!! Howie will be doing the picking..and right away it turns into a bad idea. They need a guy opposite Smith, but can Howie pick one? I have doubts. I think it is safe to say having traded that 2nd pick for a known commodity will likely have much better results (knock on wood) than just about any WR he would have drafted.
May 3, 20223 yr 6 hours ago, time2rock said: I think it is safe to say having traded that 2nd pick for a known commodity will likely have much better results (knock on wood) than just about any WR he would have drafted. I like the trade for Brown. I like the draft overall. What I do not like is loosing all the picks to move up from 15 to 13. I really, really wanted to trade lower into the end of first and top of the second. Not addressing a CB or safety earlier in the draft. Sometimes there are diamonds late in the draft, and you hit on them not because you are smart but simply by drafting more players.
Create an account or sign in to comment