5 minutes ago, Wentz_Era said:

2-1 IIRC, other people knocked out Manning before he could play Brady more times than not.

2-1 isn't right. Indy lost @ NE in both 2003 and 2004, so that's 2 right there. Manning beat NE in 2006, and 2015.

1 minute ago, Mike030270 said:

He's easy to hate on because of the recent off field stuff

And almost all of it is disingenuous based on things he didn't actually say.

1 minute ago, Wentz_Era said:

@Iggles_Phan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Brady–Peyton_Manning_rivalry

I think the wiki is wrong.  https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/tom-brady-vs-peyton-manning-head-to-head-matchups/lkd78ca80q1c1kifxwacnkjht

2 Patriots playoff wins in there.

Just now, eagle45 said:

I think the wiki is wrong.  https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/tom-brady-vs-peyton-manning-head-to-head-matchups/lkd78ca80q1c1kifxwacnkjht

2 Patriots playoff wins in there.

The world may never know.

Packers fans might be sad tonight but they should look at it as the cowboys haven’t won crap in 26 years 

18 minutes ago, CaliEagle said:

With the Bengals OL and their inability to help Burrow by giving him some hot routes, I don't know if the Bengals would handle SF this time either.  I'm surprised Burrow was able to finish the game today.

 He got crushed today, and of course w/o this dude, what chances would they have?

 

 

2 minutes ago, Wentz_Era said:

Ya it was 5 times, it's late...and beer!

 

Just now, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Packers fans might be sad tonight but they should look at it as the cowboys haven’t won crap in 26 years 

Cowboys have become one of the "could always be worse situations.”  

For the Packers…time to franchise & trade Adams, trade Rodgers, and see what Jordan Love can do.

Adams and Smith would be glorious for Minshew or whoever they draft though

3 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Wow... only 12 total.  Thought it was more than that.

Being in different conferences means only once every 4 years if they both win their division the year prior.  

I know Rodgers is a polarizing figure and 'easy' to hate...but I like to inject some perspective into things from time to time!

1 minute ago, Original Sin said:

Didn’t know this 

 

Aaron Rodgers is now 0-4 vs. the 49ers in the postseason.

 

The 49ers are a physical team and have been in recent years. The Packers have improved their physicality from the last time they played in the playoffs.  But, they aren't used to teams hitting them in the mouth.

4 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

Cowboys have become one of the "could always be worse situations.”  

For the Packers…time to franchise & trade Adams, trade Rodgers, and see what Jordan Love can do.

Idk i keep Adams simply to give love that weapon. The issue with the packers this year is they seemed to be always be in a dog fight when they shouldn’t have been.  Like baker threw 4 picks yet it was a 2 point game. The ravens had a backup QB and it came down to a two point conversion. They always kept teams in games that they were better than and it eventually caught up to them. 

 

1 minute ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Idk i keep Adams simply to give love that weapon. The issue with the packers this year is they seemed to be always be in a dog fight when they shouldn’t have been.  Like baker threw 4 picks yet it was a 2 point game. The ravens had a backup QB and it came down to a two point conversion. They always kept teams in games that they were better than and it eventually caught up to them. 

I don't think Adams is going to want to stay there though? He will get money wherever he goes, so even if GB wants to pony up cash...I don't know that will be enough for him to want to stay there with Love.  I think GB is going to lose both of them.

 

 

Just now, CaliEagle said:

I don't think Adams is going to want to stay there though? He will get money wherever he goes, so even if GB wants to pony up cash...I don't know that will be enough for him to want to stay there with Love.  I think GB is going to lose both of them.

I’m guessing they franchise tag him regardless. 

Just now, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

I’m guessing they franchise tag him regardless. 

If they do, that will probably get ugly.  He seems to have aligned himself with Rodgers, if Rodgers goes...he wants to go.

5 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Idk i keep Adams simply to give love that weapon. The issue with the packers this year is they seemed to be always be in a dog fight when they shouldn’t have been.  Like baker threw 4 picks yet it was a 2 point game. The ravens had a backup QB and it came down to a two point conversion. They always kept teams in games that they were better than and it eventually caught up to them. 

Franchise him and see what you can get.  If it doesn’t hit the auction reserve price, then give Love the weapon to help him develop.  And if they sense Adams will be a problem playing with Love on the tag, then you lower whatever that reserve price may be.

12 minutes ago, Original Sin said:

Didn’t know this 

 

Aaron Rodgers is now 0-4 vs. the 49ers in the postseason.

 

Yeah, the 9ers have gone on like two 5-year stretches during Rodg’s career where they don’t even make the playoffs… but when they do, they beat the pack.

6 minutes ago, D-Shiznit said:

 

That means he also has 1 more than Dak.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HAHAHAHAHA!

40 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

Rams will win tomorrow 

I don’t know if I can handle McVay winning anymore championships. He’s already considered the best coach alive, right?

The Rams are not the blueprint I would choose for building and maintaining a roster. Their franchise player is basically an interior DL.  Their WR corps is not built with your traditional explosive athletes or speedsters.  They trade draft picks away for vets relentlessly….they never have 1st or 2nd round picks.

Ever since our 2017 run, people joked that the Rams better win one now because they mortgaged everything to go all-in.

Yet here they are.  Not only are they still going on playoff runs, arguably armed better than ever with Stafford, but THEY are the one team in the NFC that seems primed to compete for the next few years as GB collapses and everyone else wonders who their QB will be.

 

1 minute ago, EagleJoe8 said:

That means he also has 1 more than Dak.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HAHAHAHAHA!

That QB run up the middle with no timeouts was classic and the fact that McCarthy justified that decision even makes it better.  

How deep a playoff run would Jimmy G need to make for the 49ers to consider sticking with him and trading Lance to get some draft capital back?

How much could Lance fetch in a trade?