7 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

I don’t want him unless he comes with Jimmy G. 

1 minute ago, DEagle7 said:

Doesn't seem like a real source, but man I would be real sad to see him as a Cowboy.

Doesn't make much sense they rush to trade Cooper for nothing because of salary just to trade a boat load and back the brinks up for Deebo

1 minute ago, WentzFan11 said:

I don’t want him unless he comes with Jimmy G. 

Ain’t that the saddest sentence ever written…

9 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

 

 

Ahh the very well connected Luke Stansfield.  

1 minute ago, ManuManu said:

Ain’t that the saddest sentence ever written…

Well, that ...  and Samuel is waiting to see where Baker Mayfield lands

Blog pining for Jimmy G is hilarious.  Has no ability whatsoever to stay healthy, far worse than Wentz in that regard and he just has a career now of throwing really bad interceptions at really bad times.

 

 

1 hour ago, Next_Up said:

You are inferring that it is about being sorry for him. It's not. It's about simple civility and how we actually interact in person vs. in this space. How entitled to judging others does someone have to be to say that another person "brings everything on himself?" Just ignore the kid. Over the years it is pretty obvious that he has real issues. You have people in your family with teh same types of issues who you would defend in a second if they were treated how he gets treated. Why is it necessary to continually personalize it and try and continually work to humiliate him? Is it going to make the board better by driving him off it? My opinion is that the board would be better if you, 4for4, Texas, and other people who feel entitled to address people in a manner that would never be tolerated in person, grew up a bit and didn't use the space to prove how "right" you are all the time. Just an opinion.

 

Bully!  

 

I’ve said it before, none of our additions need to be considered with Hurts in mind. He’s a stop gap QB, nothing more.

If Eagles want Deebo, one year of Hurts at QB should be a non-factor.

So listening to Solak, he thinks the Eagles will target Davis first, then McDuffie. He’d be surprised if it’s an edge. He also thinks they’d like Olave, Burks and London. He doesn’t think Elam is a fit. 

6 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

 

Ahh the very well connected Luke Stansfield.  

 he’s gotten more right then you have. So he’s got that going for him. 

Just now, D-Shiznit said:

I’ve said it before, none of our additions need to be considered with Hurts in mind. He’s a stop gap QB, nothing more.

If Eagles want Deebo, one year of Hurts at QB should be a non-factor.

I wouldn’t waste money on WR while Hurts is here. 

Just now, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 he’s gotten more right then you have. So he’s got that going for him. 

 

Genuinely curious as to what he has correctly reported in the past since I have never heard of him before.  

1 minute ago, ManuManu said:

So listening to Solak, he thinks the Eagles will target Davis first, then McDuffie. He’d be surprised if it’s an edge. He also thinks they’d like Olave, Burks and London. He doesn’t think Elam is a fit. 

I’ve been of the thinking for the last couple weeks that Davis is going to be the guy they target. His athleticism for the position is off the charts. I suspect the eagles believe they can get more out of him as a pass rusher at this level with their coaching and he’s already really good as a run defender. 

1 hour ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

he always takes it too far. 

4 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

Genuinely curious as to what he has correctly reported in the past since I have never heard of him before.  

 When you get stuff featured on BR, yahoo and MSN please let me know. Cause so far I’ve see you get banned from a message board and call people racist as your claim to fame. 

40 minutes ago, downundermike said:

The one against the Eagles he was not wide-open, threaded between three defenders.

Hurts may be able to make those throws, but he refuses to throw to the middle of the field so we don’t know.

 I think that’s more to do with him not seeing guys open in the middle of the field, once Hurts puts his eyes down to watch the rush, he loses his place on the field, makes poor throws, and misses open receivers.  His pocket awareness is really non existent and that’s has to be fixed first (if it’s possible),  to be a successful passing QB.  
 
 

1 minute ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 When you get stuff publicized on BR, yahoo and MSN please let me know. Cause so far I’ve see you get banned from a message board and call people racist as your claim to fame. 

 

Posting an editorial for Bleacher Report doesn't mean you have well connected sources within the 49ers and/or Eagles.  I don't get why you're replying back with so much hostility when based on your response I was thinking you actually had some history of following this guy and were aware of times in the past when he correctly reported something as you seemed to insinuate.  Apparently though you don't really have any idea who this guy was either before you saw the tweet.  

 

Came across this earlier...what a terrible video.  There's about 5 examples of 'successful' RPO's...I'll let you guess which comment is mine haha.

12 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

So listening to Solak, he thinks the Eagles will target Davis first, then McDuffie. He’d be surprised if it’s an edge. He also thinks they’d like Olave, Burks and London. He doesn’t think Elam is a fit. 

McDuffie worries me. Negative outlier length, overwhelmingly zone heavy college scheme, lack of competition in the PAC 12. Don't see top-20 value.

3 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 When you get stuff publicized on BR, yahoo and MSN please let me know. Cause so far I’ve see you get banned from a message board and call people racist as your claim to fame. 

This sounds like the bullying I've been reading about today.

Genuinely funny, though.

16 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

So listening to Solak, he thinks the Eagles will target Davis first, then McDuffie. He’d be surprised if it’s an edge. He also thinks they’d like Olave, Burks and London. He doesn’t think Elam is a fit. 

I like McDuffie's teammate, Gordon, a hair more.  There isn't much separating them.  I've said my long piece on Elam...athlete, not a football player.

3 minutes ago, Saltpeter said:

McDuffie worries me. Negative outlier length, overwhelmingly zone heavy college scheme, lack of competition in the PAC 12. Don't see top-20 value.

I'd rank the top-tier CB in this draft as Gardner, Stingley, Booth, McDuffie, Elam, McCreary

Long winded way of saying I prefer Booth.

15 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

Posting an editorial for Bleacher Report doesn't mean you have well connected sources within the 49ers and/or Eagles.  I don't get why you're replying back with so much hostility when based on your response I was thinking you actually had some history of following this guy and were aware of times in the past when he correctly reported something as you seemed to insinuate.  Apparently though you don't really have any idea who this guy was either before you saw the tweet.  

So let me get this straight guy who gets published by yahoo, msn and BR must have no connections and has done more in the business than you gets the snarky comment cause RTK has never heard of him. So yeah you definitely should reply with  snarky comments as the guy on here who calls people racist for no reason other than people don’t agree with your take and got banned. You got a lot going for you 

28 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

 

Ahh the very well connected Luke Stansfield.  

2nd best insider I know.

34 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:

Doesn't seem like a real source, but man I would be real sad to see him as a Cowboy.

Yeah, he does not know anyone in the NFL.