2 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

I am not sure why the Raiders would move on from Carr unless they plan on drafting a QB or trading for Rodgers.  

Just some Brady guy in the Super Bowl.  

That Fing bum…. Lol

6 minutes ago, garingovt2000 said:

What do you expect an Allen Robinson contract to look like?

Too much

Just now, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Anyone who uses "Nation" after a name of a sports team is a dope.  Completley overused and LAME.  

Always reminds me of a guy I know who is always overcompensating with some male false bravado...

He posts "Steeler Nation Rise!" on FB before every steeler game.

Guessing they sat alot during this season. 

1 minute ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

There aren't any dominant teams anymore.  Every champion can point to some mojo (or cheating) that got them over the top.

dont get me wrong, Happy we won. And sure it counts, just think there was some serious luck involved. 

28 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

We'll see if that's the case.  They might just get anxious again and act foolishly.

And that is the big question to be answered this off season!

3 minutes ago, BigEFly said:

Too much

Not only that, what assumption can we make that he wants to come here. He’s coming from Chicago where he has dealt with poor quarterback play nearly his entire time there. I don’t think he wants to come here play in this style offense unless it’s a complete overpay 

Tom Brady retires, Bucs trade for Rodgers. 

9 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

JFC, that was 23 years ago.  Angelo is unlistenable.  From 10 am-6 pm, it's really not bad.  The hosts are good for the most part.  You get you moronic callers every now and then, but nothing like it used to be back in the day.  I travel all over and have heard sports talk all over the east coast.  Philly is not as bad as you think...The morning show is bad...no doubt.  

I dont listen to any local or national shows anymore, Except Sirius NFL.  Some good hosts/some not as good. Pat Kirwan and Jim Miller are the best show. 

I dont watch any sports hype shows, no pregame or post game shows. Mainly because it's mostly fluff. I want real analysis, so I just check out guys who analyze the all 22. Greg Cosell, Duffy, Baldy, your buddy Thomas Petersen etc... I dont need fluff, I want real analysis. 

I think there is a real real good chance Brady retires  .

4 minutes ago, Original Sin said:

I think there is a real real good chance Brady retires  .

It seems like that's what Giselle wants him to do. 

15 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

I am not sure why the Raiders would move on from Carr unless they plan on drafting a QB or trading for Rodgers.  

This is a possibility.  Davis is dumb enough to overpay (see John Gruden) and Rodgers' head is big enough he would see it as a landing spot.

4 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Tom Brady retires, Bucs trade for Rodgers. 

No pressure at all for Rodgers.  Just following the greatest QB of all time.

 

16 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

I’m not against trading back and getting 2023 picks. Here’s the problem you have to have a team willing to do that. Just because the eagles want that is not the same as there’s a team willing to give you the draft capital it takes to make that move.  

It takes two to tango. The Eagles might want to move out of a spot and teams say we’re not willing to give you our 2023 draft picks. As much as it would benefit the Eagles to do that it’s not an automatic that happens.

The Eagles in terms of where their draft pick was last year in 2021 had more of it advantage to do that. Because they were picking 6th overall. That pick was More value than a pick like 15th and likely better more coveted prospects. i’m not saying it’s impossible but I think it’s much harder this year as compared to last with that variable.

I actually don’t have the answer to this but I would love to know over the last 30 years team is picking at 15,16 or 19 when they have traded back, how many of them have acquired a first round pick and how far back did they have to move to acquire it? I’m only guessing but assume it is not many

Howie doesn't have to do it all in a single trade, he can make a series of trades like he did in moving up to get Wentz. Moved up from 13 to 8, then again from 8 to 2. Maybe he's only able to move down in the current draft and pick up an extra 2nd for next year. Whatever ammo he can get in 2023 I think would go a long way in building the future for this team.

1 minute ago, NCiggles said:

It seems like that's what Giselle wants him to do. 

Yep , and he is talking about his 3 kids and spending time with them 

I hope he don’t but I think he is done 

5 minutes ago, Original Sin said:

I think there is a real real good chance Brady retires  .

I listen to the let’s go podcast yesterday when he was talking about it. I think there’s a much better chance than I initially thought. I still don’t think he does in the end but it’s much more realistic then ever before 

1 minute ago, Ipiggles said:

 

Burrow and Tannehill were matador's?

1 minute ago, Ipiggles said:

 

Connecticut Eagle ⛱️🍔🍺

7 minutes ago, wussbasket said:

Howie doesn't have to do it all in a single trade, he can make a series of trades like he did in moving up to get Wentz. Moved up from 13 to 8, then again from 8 to 2. Maybe he's only able to move down in the current draft and pick up an extra 2nd for next year. Whatever ammo he can get in 2023 I think would go a long way in building the future for this team.

Again I’m not saying he can’t do that. What I’m telling you is it takes two to tango to do that. Just because you did it in a previous year does not mean it’s a given to happen again in the next year because of things outside of your control  

 it’s not impossible and I’m not saying he shouldn’t try, but what I’m telling you is the cards might not go your way like it did in previous years to accomplish that.

And you still might not have the best draft capital in 2023 even if you do make those moves.  There is the possibility other teams acquire better assets then you do in 2023 and you still aren’t able to acquire the quarterback because you can’t match their assets.

My point in this is they’re things outside of the Eagles control that factors into this that just hoping on 2023 assets could still blow up in their face 

How many 12 year olds voted? SMH proof the general Eagle fan is an actual idiot

 

 

5 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

Angleos unbearable.  Mikey Miss is awful. Decamara is awful but Jon Ritchie is good. "The cuz" get pretty bad but I like Andrew Salcinus 

I also mix in pod casts so I do ok. 

Most of radio guys are just looking to get attention and ratings so I don't really trust their opinions. The journalists aren't much better but I do believe there is some honesty in their reporting that goes beyond just generating views. The one person I trust the most is Ray Didinger. He's a very knowledgeable straight shooter. When he talks I listen!

2 minutes ago, Ipiggles said:

How many 12 year olds voted? SMH proof the general Eagle fan is an actual idiot

 

 

Honestly can’t believe reagor didn’t get it. 

2 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Honestly can’t believe reagor didn’t get it. 

Lol that's when you know Howie is pushing an agenda

QB - Hurts 
WR - Smith
WR - Allen Robinson (FA Bears)
WR - Quez 
RB - Sanders 
RB - Jerome Ford (Draft from Cincinnati)
RB - Kenneth Gainwell 
TE - Goedert 
TE -  Cole Turner (Draft from Nevada)
OT - Mailata
LG - Dickerson 
OC - Kelce (one more year)
RG - Darian Kinnard (Draft Kentucky)
RT - Lane

I really think they stick with Hurts (not saying it's the right call) so just basing this mock off-season off of that.  This leaves plenty of draft picks for the Defense.

Is this semi-realistic based on the cap?

 

22 minutes ago, Ipiggles said:

 

Not for nothing but when you combine them you only get four different sports.