9 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

It's common sense.  in a bidding war the ace up the sleeve for the Eagles is that they have 3 first round picks this year.  This is something no other team can offer the Texans so if Watson were to waive the NTC and the Eagles were all in on getting him then they will likely have to give those up if it means them or another team getting Watson.  

The defense isn't going to magically give up fewer points and be able to make stops at the end of games if they add an improvement at QB.  

It's not common sense, it's your opinion just like it's my opinion they would rather spread the wealth over 2-3 drafts than consolidate in one draft, especially a draft lacking good QBs.

If there is improved QB play the defense may not need to make stop after stop after stop to win a game.

Eagles deleted Hurts from all promotional material. 
 

4 minutes ago, Talonblood said:

I know hilarious when I hear it. He ain't it. He just spouts stupid bullsh** 😂

 

3 minutes ago, Outlaw said:

Awww. Mom gave you more screen time? Good for you, champ. 

That's all you got? 😆

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

Eagles deleted Hurts from all promotional material. 
 

That is both interesting and a bit scary.  Don't really want Watson.  

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Eagles deleted Hurts from all promotional material. 
 

Again?

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Eagles deleted Hurts from all promotional material. 
 

Source ??

2 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Eagles deleted Hurts from all promotional material. 
 

I can't find him on the roster either!

1 minute ago, downundermike said:

 

 

honest question, i didnt watch a lot of Texan games, is Watson that good? The Texans have always sucked with him at QB. What am i missing? I understand he is better than Hurts (who i am no fan of) but is Watson 'that good'?

6 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Eagles deleted Hurts from all promotional material. 
 

?

33 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

In the off chance that Watson waives his NTC for the Eagles then they will be entering a rabid bidding war.  It will likely take at least all 3 of their firsts this year.  

No it wont.

7 minutes ago, Freshmilk said:

It's not common sense, it's your opinion just like it's my opinion they would rather spread the wealth over 2-3 drafts than consolidate in one draft, especially a draft lacking good QBs.

If there is improved QB play the defense may not need to make stop after stop after stop to win a game.

 

What separates the Eagles and another team offering the same deal then if you're spreading across drafts?  The advantage of the Eagles is that they can spread across drafts but they can also trade 3 firsts in this draft to a Texans team in need of a lot of talent.  

Just now, HazletonEagle said:

No it wont.

 

Why not? 

2 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

What separates the Eagles and another team offering the same deal then if you're spreading across drafts?  The advantage of the Eagles is that they can spread across drafts but they can also trade 3 firsts in this draft to a Texans team in need of a lot of talent.  

 

Why not? 

Because its illogical. 

And then you have the 2023 first back that you trade for Watson

 

 

On Eagles website Hurts is listed as being on the roster.

13 minutes ago, DoWorx said:

honest question, i didnt watch a lot of Texan games, is Watson that good? The Texans have always sucked with him at QB. What am i missing? I understand he is better than Hurts (who i am no fan of) but is Watson 'that good'?

Yes. He is. They played with a bottom 3 defense like 3 years in a row.  But he is easily top 5 NFL qb.

speaking of lots of cap space and the meaningless dead cap, any update yet on how the Kelce contract affects things?

4 minutes ago, What The F said:

Yes. He is. They played with a bottom 3 defense like 3 years in a row.  But he is easily top 5 NFL qb.

No

21 minutes ago, Talonblood said:

That's all you got? 😆

Says the guy who has nothing but old memes.  

19 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

Because its illogical. 

 

How is it illogical?  Explain to me the logic that the 3 first round picks the Eagles have which separate them from every other team bidding for him would not be part of the trade?  

Just now, RememberTheKoy said:

 

How is it illogical?  Explain to me the logic that the 3 first round picks the Eagles have which separate them from every other team bidding for him would not be part of the trade?  

I really dont think I can. 

Just now, HazletonEagle said:

I really dont think I can. 

 

Alright cool, can't back up your stance.   Eagles and another team offer the same trade, why is that scale being pushed to the Eagles side?  The 3 first round picks are the scale tipping asset that the Eagles have in any trade this offseason.  

12 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

Alright cool, can't back up your stance.   Eagles and another team offer the same trade, why is that scale being pushed to the Eagles side?  The 3 first round picks are the scale tipping asset that the Eagles have in any trade this offseason.  

oh wow. didnt realize that.

Just now, HazletonEagle said:

oh wow. didnt realize that.

 

I guess you did now that you're replying like some teenage girl instead of providing the thought process behind your belief.