Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The Eagles Message Board

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

Utah teen athlete faces threats after state official posted photos questioning her gender

https://www.axios.com/local/salt-lake-city/2024/02/08/utah-school-board-natalie-cline-gender-basketball-threats

1707410018851.thumb.webp.2e92b48b5e42c2b3422ed509901aaab5.webp

Utah state school board member Natalie Cline is under fire after posting photos of a high school basketball player, questioning her gender and prompting threats against the girl.

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Views 93.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • You live in Florida? I do. Things are getting worse here, and they were already bad before I got here. You had basically a center right political system (*chef’s kiss*), crime was an issue but it

  • VanHammersly
    VanHammersly

Posted Images

 John Spartan, you are fined five credits for repeated violations of the verbal morality statute

Let Me Make Demolition Man 2 - by Matt Bors - Bors Comics

image.jpeg.0fae3ca75386f14755e06c558490b07b.jpeg

  • Author
14 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

image.jpeg.0fae3ca75386f14755e06c558490b07b.jpeg

 

On 2/6/2024 at 3:54 PM, Kz! said:

Hey look, book bans are cool with liberals again.

 

 

 

1 minute ago, The_Omega said:

 

toss him and the da that made that deal, in the same wood chipper. 

:lol: Even Meatball Ron has to admit that right wing losers have been using his law to limit free speech and force their obnoxious ideology on kids. You hate to see it. 

DeSantis has second thoughts about his book ban in Florida:

Quote

With objecting - if you go to a school board meeting objecting. If you have a kid in school, okay. But if you're somebody who doesn't have a kid in school and you're gonna object to 100 books? No, I don't think that's appropriate. 

 

Wait, so you mean that objection to Amanda Gorman's book for being hateful and divisive by a childless trumpbot c u next tuesday might not have been valid? 

1grvjo.jpg?a474264

image.png.81d051499b30b93943027af55dd29487.png

There are plenty of actors dressing as women going back to Shakespeare’s time.  If they remade Mrs Doubtfire today, there be an uproar if the didn’t use a trans actor.

Do we think the cross-dressing proclivities precipitated the initial divorce proceedings?

My favourite film aged 12: Mrs Doubtfire | Robin Williams | The Guardian

9 minutes ago, sameaglesfan said:

Do we think the cross-dressing proclivities precipitated the initial divorce proceedings?

My favourite film aged 12: Mrs Doubtfire | Robin Williams | The Guardian

i doubt that fire led to the divorce. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sorry, i had to. 

image.jpeg.19ba88ab6b942b34d266a01cd8cba938.jpeg

  • Author

Should liberals even be allowed to have children?

On 2/15/2024 at 3:17 PM, toolg said:

DeSantis has second thoughts about his book ban in Florida:

 

This is a bit of a difficult issue, actually. I’ll preface this by saying that I’m assuming Florida’s school funding is tied to local property taxes in a structure similar to PA’s funding model. If that is not the case, then this post may be totally off base.
 

All residents of the community that pay school taxes have the same rights to be involved in the school’s function through attendance and requests at school board meetings regardless of whether or not they have children in the schools. To act differently is absolutely not right and borders on taxation without representation. 
 

When I was on our local school board we had a staff member that lived in the community. Parents and some of the other staff that interacted with this Indian loved them, but they were acting inappropriately and harassing certain members of the staff. The person elected to resign rather than face termination. After the separation of employment, they began harassing administration by making an overwhelming number of requests for information including emails that mentioned specific topics - broad topics like "Covid”. The requests were within their rights as a tax payer in the community, but were taking a ton of resources for the district. And there were 5-10 new requests every day, multiple calls, emails, etc. Every request had to go through the attorney to make sure the district was complying with the law. The requests and the identity of the person making them were covered by confidentiality so we couldn’t call them out publicly so instead I just asked administration for the total dollar amount that we had spent to-date on the FOIL requests that had been coming in during public session. Once the number was public, and everyone realized how much of their tax dollars were going to these wild goose chases the requests stopped. But it wouldn’t have been right or legal for us to limit that persons right to make the requests just because they didnt have kids in the district just like we couldn’t and wouldn’t have prevented someone that chose to send their kids to a private or charter school from commenting during a public meeting as long as they lived and paid taxes in the community. 

This thread has completely broken Toaster :roll: Posting pics and articles about male whales F'ing - F'n weirdo 

17 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

i mean, they're called humpback whales, after all. 

A perfect joke that writes itself.

29 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

i mean, they're called humpback whales, after all. 

 

CDA6C42F-6C6D-4C2B-B912-0A7C63EA5229.png

5 minutes ago, Imp81318 said:

This is a bit of a difficult issue, actually. I’ll preface this by saying that I’m assuming Florida’s school funding is tied to local property taxes in a structure similar to PA’s funding model. If that is not the case, then this post may be totally off base.
 

All residents of the community that pay school taxes have the same rights to be involved in the school’s function through attendance and requests at school board meetings regardless of whether or not they have children in the schools. To act differently is absolutely not right and borders on taxation without representation. 
 

When I was on our local school board we had a staff member that lived in the community. Parents and some of the other staff that interacted with this Indian loved them, but they were acting inappropriately and harassing certain members of the staff. The person elected to resign rather than face termination. After the separation of employment, they began harassing administration by making an overwhelming number of requests for information including emails that mentioned specific topics - broad topics like "Covid”. The requests were within their rights as a tax payer in the community, but were taking a ton of resources for the district. And there were 5-10 new requests every day, multiple calls, emails, etc. Every request had to go through the attorney to make sure the district was complying with the law. The requests and the identity of the person making them were covered by confidentiality so we couldn’t call them out publicly so instead I just asked administration for the total dollar amount that we had spent to-date on the FOIL requests that had been coming in during public session. Once the number was public, and everyone realized how much of their tax dollars were going to these wild goose chases the requests stopped. But it wouldn’t have been right or legal for us to limit that persons right to make the requests just because they didnt have kids in the district just like we couldn’t and wouldn’t have prevented someone that chose to send their kids to a private or charter school from commenting during a public meeting as long as they lived and paid taxes in the community. 

Nice story. But it skirts the issue. I agree, taxpayers have a right to be involved in public school board hearings. But it is not a difficult issue, actually. The DeSantis bill had the direct result of residents challenging minute details of the school's curriculum, through the school board, by people who do not have any stake in the classroom. The bill is wrong and excessive. 

 

36 minutes ago, Imp81318 said:

This is a bit of a difficult issue, actually. I’ll preface this by saying that I’m assuming Florida’s school funding is tied to local property taxes in a structure similar to PA’s funding model. If that is not the case, then this post may be totally off base.
 

All residents of the community that pay school taxes have the same rights to be involved in the school’s function through attendance and requests at school board meetings regardless of whether or not they have children in the schools. To act differently is absolutely not right and borders on taxation without representation. 
 

When I was on our local school board we had a staff member that lived in the community. Parents and some of the other staff that interacted with this Indian loved them, but they were acting inappropriately and harassing certain members of the staff. The person elected to resign rather than face termination. After the separation of employment, they began harassing administration by making an overwhelming number of requests for information including emails that mentioned specific topics - broad topics like "Covid”. The requests were within their rights as a tax payer in the community, but were taking a ton of resources for the district. And there were 5-10 new requests every day, multiple calls, emails, etc. Every request had to go through the attorney to make sure the district was complying with the law. The requests and the identity of the person making them were covered by confidentiality so we couldn’t call them out publicly so instead I just asked administration for the total dollar amount that we had spent to-date on the FOIL requests that had been coming in during public session. Once the number was public, and everyone realized how much of their tax dollars were going to these wild goose chases the requests stopped. But it wouldn’t have been right or legal for us to limit that persons right to make the requests just because they didnt have kids in the district just like we couldn’t and wouldn’t have prevented someone that chose to send their kids to a private or charter school from commenting during a public meeting as long as they lived and paid taxes in the community. 

I think your example actually reinforces the point. Some laws are poorly written and ripe for abuse. Just because someone has a legal right to do something doesn't mean they should exercise that right beyond reason. A busy-body trumpbot karen had the legal right to challenge reading content in her local Florida school district even though she's old, single, and has no kids, but that doesn't mean she should do that 100 times, especially for purely political reasons.

24 minutes ago, Shepard Wong said:

 

CDA6C42F-6C6D-4C2B-B912-0A7C63EA5229.png

 

I'm afraid to find out about Sperm Wales.

1 hour ago, mikemack8 said:

This thread has completely broken Toaster :roll: Posting pics and articles about male whales F'ing - F'n weirdo 

Making fun of you is a gift. I appreciate your continued queefing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.