April 28, 20223 yr It's hilarious those that fall so hard for anything the Left Media and politicians put out have zero awareness of it, even after the facts come out. This is why we are doomed as a society.
April 28, 20223 yr Just now, Ipiggles said: I am sure the whole Russian Collusion narrative also played zero part in the election results. Not to mention, how much a racist NSDAP Trump was. No that part probably gained him a lot of votes.
April 28, 20223 yr 23 minutes ago, NOTW said: No one can top our current POTUS, Groomer-in-Chief No one except for this pervert.
April 28, 20223 yr Author 1 minute ago, VanHammersly said: The obvious, huge difference is that Hunter Biden is not Joe Biden. Trump, meanwhile, was personally caught up in corruption scandals for his entire presidency. No one was going to switch their vote to an obviously corrupt Trump to avoid voting in the father of someone who might be corrupt. Again, I understand that it's difficult for you to wrap your head around the idea that some people were truly on the fence in 2020 and a negative story about Biden could have tipped some people toward Trump. This post isn't necessarily an explanation for you, but for non-NPCs that might be reading this thread.
April 28, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Ipiggles said: I am sure the whole Russian Collusion narrative also played zero part in the election results. Not to mention, how much a racist NSDAP Trump was.
April 28, 20223 yr Author 5 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said: so, really impossible to say, but at best, a maybe. i'm convinced now. Yes, that's generally how speculating about complete hypotheticals works, you complete moron. Now go google the words from that sentence you don't understand and get back to me with the best gif you can find.
April 28, 20223 yr 3 minutes ago, Ipiggles said: It's hilarious those that fall so hard for anything the Left Media and politicians put out have zero awareness of it, even after the facts come out. This is why we are doomed as a society. while it's not hilarious, it is sad to see people like you on the right who think they haven't been swayed themselves.
April 28, 20223 yr Just now, Alpha_TATEr said: while it's not hilarious, it is sad to see people like you on the right who think they haven't been swayed themselves. He's an independent thinker! Do your research!
April 28, 20223 yr 5 minutes ago, Ipiggles said: I know you like this sort of thing, but you are wasting your time on a guys that fall for whatever CNN/Adam Schift tells him. It's who they are This is literally your fall back position to every arguement. You can be told multiple times that the vast majority of this board doesn't watch a minute of network news and you still come back to this every time and in your simpleton little mind its a "checkmate". I assume you acquired this tactic while tuning into the episodes of Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity you record and watch on a loop every single night.
April 28, 20223 yr 37 minutes ago, NOTW said: No one can top our current POTUS, Groomer-in-Chief That girl has a MASSIVE head! Freaking dope....
April 28, 20223 yr 19 minutes ago, Kz! said: Again, I understand that it's difficult for you to wrap your head around the idea that some people were truly on the fence in 2020 and a negative story about Biden could have tipped some people toward Trump. This post isn't necessarily an explanation for you, but for non-NPCs that might be reading this thread. You think anyone on the board is swayed by your posts. That's adorable.
April 28, 20223 yr 48 minutes ago, Ipiggles said: Cant say stolen, can say there was definite interference. Hunters Laptop story is a fact. Yes the left and their media outlets hid an actual news story in order to help coerce a desired outcome - "remember everyone touting 51 former intell experts called it Russian Disinfo?" Yeah it may not have been stolen, but there were things manipulated to help the outcome. And without the DNC being hacked due to interference by RUSSIAN intelligence Hillary may well have won. 2016 was a much closer election than 2020 - what was it 80k people across three states? Biden's lead in those same states in 2020 was more than double. The NY post story would not have moved the needle that much. But months of "but her emails" due to DNC hacks and Russian bots? That might have made a difference.
April 28, 20223 yr Author 9 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: You think anyone on the board is swayed by your posts. That's adorable. This isn't even an argument or an attempt to "sway" anyone in here, but rather an exercise in having them imagine an easily conceivable hypothetical. Again, these are concepts that no one expects you, as an NPC, to understand , but yes, some people reading these posts may be able to conceive of the idea that Biden was not overwhelmingly popular with everyone that voted for him and could have been swayed to another candidate with negative press coming out about him just weeks before the election.
April 28, 20223 yr 28 minutes ago, Ipiggles said: I am sure the whole Russian Collusion narrative also played zero part in the election results. Not to mention, how much a racist NSDAP Trump was. Let’s be real. Yes, a small group would have moved over to Trump. However, the vast majority of moderates and never Trumpets had had enough. Issues with a candidate’s son wasn’t going to move the needle for 98% of the moderates by that point. The game was already over.
April 28, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Kz! said: Again, these are concepts that no one expects you, as an NPC, to understand , but yes, some people reading these posts may be able to conceive of the idea that Biden was not overwhelmingly popular with everyone that voted for him and could have been swayed to another candidate with negative press coming out about him just weeks before the election. This isn't even an argument or an attempt to "sway" anyone in here, but rather an exercise in having them imagine an easily conceivable hypothetical. Except, again, the only other possible candidate to vote for was known by everyone in America as 100% corrupt. Millions of voters weren't switching their votes to the guy that never divested from his business and turned the Presidency into an infomercial if their goal was to avoid corruption. I know it still hurts, but you guys have to move on. It's trapped you in an infinite loop of victimhood.
April 28, 20223 yr 11 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: Except, again, the only other possible candidate to vote for was known by everyone in America as 100% corrupt. Millions of voters weren't switching their votes to the guy that never divested from his business and turned the Presidency into an infomercial if their goal was to avoid corruption. I know it still hurts, but you guys have to move on. It's trapped you in an infinite loop of victimhood. Not even a question. Very few would have switched.
April 28, 20223 yr Author 15 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: Except, again, the only other possible candidate to vote for was known by everyone in America as 100% corrupt. Millions of voters weren't switching their votes to the guy that never divested from his business and turned the Presidency into an infomercial if their goal was to avoid corruption. I know it still hurts, but you guys have to move on. It's trapped you in an infinite loop of victimhood. Social media and mainstream media suppressed a completely real story that was damaging to Biden to help him win. That's all there is to it. No one really cares that a retarded NPC ishlib can't conceive of the possibility that this could have affected the outcome of the vote.
April 28, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Kz! said: Social media and mainstream media suppressed a completely real story that was damaging to Biden to help him win. That's all there is to it. No one really cares that a retarded NPC ishlib can't conceive of the possibility that this could have affected the outcome of the vote. And right wing media suppressed negative Trump stories for his entire presidency. What's your point? That the media's biased? Yeah, we know.
April 28, 20223 yr 12 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: Not even a question. Very few would have switched. But would they still have voted for The Big Guy? If it didn't matter, the media wouldn't have covered it up.
April 28, 20223 yr Author 9 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: And right wing media suppressed negative Trump stories for his entire presidency. What's your point? That the media's biased? Yeah, we know. Yes, Fox news regularly coordinated with social media companies, former intelligence officials, and the rest of the MSM to falsely brand damaging stories about Trump as Russian disinformation and to have legitimate news stories deplatformed and suppressed. Very good, Van. Have we reached peak NPC yet, or do you still have more in you?
April 28, 20223 yr 8 minutes ago, The_Omega said: But would they still have voted for The Big Guy? If it didn't matter, the media wouldn't have covered it up. Obviously we will never know but I think very few would have changed anything.
April 28, 20223 yr https://nationworldnews.com/sean-hannity-excited-over-obedient-election-day-texts-to-mark-meadows/ "Stress every vote counts. Get out and vote,” Mark Meadows, then-President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, texted Hannity on November 3, 2020, according to Nation World News. "On the radio.” "Yes sir,” replied Hannity. "At this. Any place in particular we need a push.” When Meadows named Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Arizona, and Nevada, Hannity texted back: "Understood. Everywhere.”
April 28, 20223 yr 4 minutes ago, Kz! said: Yes, Fox news regularly coordinated with social media companies, former intelligence officials, and the rest of the MSM to falsely brand damaging stories about Trump as Russian disinformation and to have legitimate news stories deplatformed and suppressed. Very good, Van. Have we reached peak NPC yet, or do you still have more in you? Um, no, Fox didn't do that, they just literally coordinated directly with the President everyday on messaging. Quote Fox News host Sean Hannity has come under fire for a text message exchange with Mark Meadows that appear to show him taking orders from the Trump administration official during the 2020 presidential elections. The text exchange, sourced from the House committee investigating the Capitol riot, showed Hannity had asked former president Donald Trump’s chief of staff if some places needed a boost for voter turnout on the afternoon of election day on 3 November 2020. He had asked the White House official: "Hey, NC [North Carolina] gonna be ok?” Hannity was told by Mr Meadows to "stress every vote matters” and "get out and vote” in the text exchange, as reported by CNN. The Fox news host replied back saying: "Yes sir. On it. Any place in particular we need a push.” He's literally taking orders from the Chief of Staff on where they need to get out the vote days before the election. And he says "yes sir" after getting his orders. 1 minute ago, mr_hunt said: https://nationworldnews.com/sean-hannity-excited-over-obedient-election-day-texts-to-mark-meadows/ "Stress every vote counts. Get out and vote,” Mark Meadows, then-President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, texted Hannity on November 3, 2020, according to Nation World News. "On the radio.” "Yes sir,” replied Hannity. "At this. Any place in particular we need a push.” When Meadows named Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Arizona, and Nevada, Hannity texted back: "Understood. Everywhere.” damnit, you beat me to it.
April 28, 20223 yr 4 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: Obviously we will never know but I think very few would have changed anything. Maybe, but it's also possible that it would have. There's little doubt that their actions directly benefitted one candidate though which, at the very least, makes it an enormous in-kind contribution.
Create an account or sign in to comment