May 4, 20223 yr 25 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: Instead of packing the court, Dems should go after Thomas. dems worry too much about looking bad...buncha puzzies most of the time. repugs don't give any fargs...they'll do any underhanded, hypocritical bullsheet it takes to get what they want...and they usually get away with it.
May 4, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, mikemack8 said: I see @dawkins4prez finally arrived today with his, as always, super edgy takes I see you have nothing to add to the conversation, as usual.
May 4, 20223 yr Just now, Toastrel said: Remove his seditious wife supporting ass from a court he has no business being a member of. It would never actually happen though. Like a President's impeachment, it requires a 2/3 vote in the Senate. They don't have anything close to the votes. It's a waste of time.
May 4, 20223 yr Author 3 minutes ago, mikemack8 said: I see @dawkins4prez finally arrived today with his, as always, super edgy takes I'm still offended that he said cheesesteaks suck.
May 4, 20223 yr 1 hour ago, EaglesRocker97 said: It's pretty hilarious how, from the moment of conception, Republicans' 6-year-old understanding of human biology is that a woman automatically has a fully formed "baby" in her. Stay in school, kids Dude, I lean pro choice. And for the most part, I'm staying out of this. But this post is f'n embarassing for you.
May 4, 20223 yr 5 minutes ago, Toastrel said: I see you have nothing to add to the conversation, as usual. The resident dementia patient thinks I bring nothing to the table - how will I ever recover
May 4, 20223 yr 7 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: dems worry too much about looking bad...bunch puzzies most of the time. repugs don't give any fargs...they'll do any underhanded, hypocritical bullsheet it takes to get what they want...and they usually get away with it. Part of the situation yeah. The House investigation should open the door to go after Thomas. 13 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: I don't really know what "go after Thomas" means. He's a disgrace to the country and has no business being on the SC, but much like court packing, impeachment has no chance of happening. Maybe but we are in new territory
May 4, 20223 yr 48 minutes ago, Gannan said: Ultimately boils down to when does a fetus get constitutional rights. that's a debate that will never end. IMHO an abortion after the 1st trimester should only be performed to save the mother. i know others will have a different opinion and that's fine.
May 4, 20223 yr White supremacist Peter Brimelow is cheering the Alito draft opinion. Says Brown v. Board (and Sullivan!) is next.
May 4, 20223 yr 18 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said: Welcome to Red America. It's Biden's America, he's the sitting POTUS. He should do something about it.
May 4, 20223 yr Author 4 minutes ago, paco said: Dude, I lean pro choice. And for the most part, I'm staying out of this. But this post is f'n embarassing for you. Not at all. It's pretty absurd to think that a mass of cells in the immediate period after conception is the exact same thing as a fully formed, viable fetus at 6-9 months.
May 4, 20223 yr 3 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: Maybe but we are in new territory New territory or not, it's not gonna happen. Even if Robert's investigation finds that Thomas was the leaker, they would still never be able to impeach him. There's no point in trying. Unless Garland wanted to pursue charges against him, which I suppose might change the equation, but DOJ has already said they're unlikely to that (and I don't think a crime was committed anyway).
May 4, 20223 yr 1 hour ago, EaglesRocker97 said: Not at all. It's pretty absurd to think that a mass of cells in the immediate period after conception is the exact same thing as a fully formed, viable fetus at 6-9 months. Again From the pro choice life the mantra has been "Life begins at conception". Not "It's a fully formed fetus at the moment of conception". Take a breath man.
May 4, 20223 yr 8 minutes ago, mikemack8 said: The resident dementia patient thinks I bring nothing to the table - how will I ever recover Ooh, borrowed that from your pal Kz!, eh? Nice.
May 4, 20223 yr Just now, Toastrel said: Ooh, borrowed that from your pal Kz!, eh? Nice. I don't need to borrow the fact that you suffer from dementia from anyone - it's evident from the posts you make.
May 4, 20223 yr Author 4 minutes ago, paco said: Again From the pro choice crowd the mantra has been "Life begins at conception". Not "It's a fully formed fetus at the moment of conception". Take a breath man. Right, which is why it's so ridiculous to think that a fertilized embryo without a central nervous system is the exact same thing as a baby the moment before labor. It's also kinda funny, considering the Bible does not say this, and if anything, indicates that life begins at breath. Where is the textual reference for "life begins at conception?" It's just some evangelical perspective that's become a dogmatic cudgel for anyone who has any sort of pro-choice leanings.
May 4, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, EaglesRocker97 said: Right, which is why it's so ridiculous to think that a fertilized embryo without a central nervous system is the exact same thing as a baby the moment before labor. It's also kinda funny, considering the Bible does not say this, and if anything, indicates that life begins at breath. Where is the textual reference for "life begins at conception?" It's just some evangelical perspective that's become a dogmatic cudgel for anyone who has any sort of pro-choice leanings. Who says they are the exact same thing?
May 4, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, EaglesRocker97 said: Right, which is why it's so ridiculous to think that a fertilized embryo without a central nervous system is the exact same thing as a baby the moment before labor. It's also kinda funny, considering the Bible does not say this, and if anything, indicates that life begins at breath. Where is the textual reference for "life begins at conception?" It's just some evangelical perspective that's become a dogmatic cudgel for anyone who has any sort of pro-choice leanings. an interpretation of some book is irrelevant.
May 4, 20223 yr 3 minutes ago, EaglesRocker97 said: Right, which is why it's so ridiculous to think that a fertilized embryo without a central nervous system is the exact same thing as a baby the moment before labor. It's also kinda funny, considering the Bible does not say this, and if anything, indicates that life begins at breath. Where is the textual reference for "life begins at conception?" It's just some evangelical perspective that's become a dogmatic cudgel for anyone who has any sort of pro-choice leanings. Science
May 4, 20223 yr Author 3 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: Who says they are the exact same thing? Pro-life radicals who want sexual assault victims to bear their rapists' babies 2 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: an interpretation of some book is irrelevant. It is, but even by using their own religious texts, this definition does not hold up
May 4, 20223 yr It's so insane that we're talking about God in politics in 2022 and have a Supreme Court full of Catholic theocrats. The vast majority of Americans believe in the right to have an abortion under reasonable circumstances (X number of weeks, sexual battery/incest, etc.). This is an outrage whether it directly impacts you or not.
May 4, 20223 yr 24 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: dems worry too much about looking bad...buncha puzzies most of the time. repugs don't give any fargs...they'll do any underhanded, hypocritical bullsheet it takes to get what they want...and they usually get away with it. Oh like Dems leaking this draft just before theyre about to get their arses handed to them in November? Weird, almost like theyre trying a hail mary because they dont like the democratic process Just now, Saltpeter said: It's so insane that we're talking about God in politics in 2022 and have a Supreme Court full of Catholic theocrats. The vast majority of Americans believe in the right to have an abortion under reasonable circumstances (X number of weeks, sexual battery/incest, etc.). This is an outrage whether it impacts you or not. False
May 4, 20223 yr 10 minutes ago, EaglesRocker97 said: Not at all. It's pretty absurd to think that a mass of cells in the immediate period after conception is the exact same thing as a fully formed, viable fetus at 6-9 months. Who actually says at conception it's a fully formed baby or the exact same thing as a fully formed, viable fetus at 6-9 months? I've never heard any pro life argument suggest that.
Create an account or sign in to comment