The GB WR thing is completely overrated. Brady wins with Lacrosse players and scrubs. Wentz won in 2019 with scrubs.

It has everything to do with the worst leader in professional sports not bothering to get in sync with those WRs.

They all hate him. How could they not? (except Cobb) How would you feel if your boss did not put in the extra work on the weekend while you did so he could do drugs and then blamed you for him not being there?

Lets see if Lazard stays there to play with A A Ron next year or runs away like MVS and Adams. He had no choice this year.

Was a Packers WR supposed to be on top of a Lion's helmet today? That's where the ball went.

2 minutes ago, Alphagrand said:

You have to take your agenda and the personality out of it.  Heinicke isn’t any F’ing good; WASH knows that.  They traded for another QB to replace him.  Putting him back in there for an extended period does them no good at all.

The QB you detest has only played 5 games.  The team is winning because they’re beating horrible opposition, not because the QB play has been any better. If Wentz was in there the whole time their fortunes would be exactly the same, except they might have beaten MIN today.

WASH is very likely drafting QB next April, but playing Heinicke over the guy they traded assets to replace him with would be purely dumb.

Very questionable. Wentz gets killed behind their line by any team with a decent rush, and the Vikes had one today.

4 minutes ago, Alphagrand said:

You have to take your agenda and the personality out of it.  Heinicke isn’t any F’ing good; WASH knows that.  They traded for another QB to replace him.  Putting him back in there for an extended period does them no good at all.

The QB you detest has only played 5 games.  The team is winning because they’re beating horrible opposition, not because the QB play has been any better.  If Wentz was in there the whole time their fortunes would be exactly the same, except they might have beaten MIN today.

WASH is very likely drafting QB next April, but playing Heinicke over the guy they traded assets to replace him with would be purely dumb.

Washington’s offense still sucks. In the 3 games with heinicke they are averaging 19 points. 

Don’t know if it was mentioned but Cowboys apparently are in on OBJ

Kupp is still awesome.

This Kupp guy might be a player in this league 

If DC goes 4-13 or 6-11 this year everyone gets fired so tanking serves no purpose.

Heinicke is the better pro QB right now and its not even close.

You play the better player.

Bucs losing this very winnable game to the Rams is going to be so frustrating, because the Saints are winning tomorrow night.

21 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said:

You said you didn't want Foles to win the Super Bowl.

 

No.  I clearly stated I hope Foles and the Eagles win the Super Bowl.  And I also clearly stated that if Foles were not on the Eagles but were on some other team, as journeyman often are, then at that time I wouldn't have wanted to see him win a Super Bowl somewhere else.  

6 hours ago, Nivraga said:

Yes but they weren't suppose to be here yet. This team is ascending. 

This team is made up of veterans... not sure how much ascension they have left.

6 minutes ago, RLC said:

Bucs losing this very winnable game to the Rams is going to be so frustrating, because the Saints are winning tomorrow night.

They aren't gonna beat the Ravens

1 minute ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

No.  I clearly stated I hope Foles and the Eagles win the Super Bowl.  And I also clearly stated that if Foles were not on the Eagles but were on some other team, as journeyman often are, then at that time I wouldn't have wanted to see him win a Super Bowl somewhere else.  

BS! You were asked flat out, do you want Foles to win the Super Bowl, and your reply started with No. Followed by a period. A period denoted the end of a thought. Enough with Foles being elsewhere BS. It has no relevance to the question you were asked at the time. It's nothing more than a red herring.   

8 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

No.  I clearly stated I hope Foles and the Eagles win the Super Bowl.  And I also clearly stated that if Foles were not on the Eagles but were on some other team, as journeyman often are, then at that time I wouldn't have wanted to see him win a Super Bowl somewhere else.  

False. You did not state that.

3 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said:

BS! You were asked flat out, do you want Foles to win the Super Bowl, and your reply started with No. Followed by a period. A period denoted the end of a thought. Enough with Foles being elsewhere BS. It has no relevance to the question you were asked at the time. It's nothing more than a red herring.   

 

It does have relevance when you read the next sentence. Don't be intentionally obtuse and ignore the rest of the post. 

2 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

It does have relevance when you read the next sentence. Don't be intentionally obtuse and ignore the rest of the post. 

How you started the post, made the rest of the post meaningless. You said no. Any mention of Foles being elsewhere had no relevance, as I said. You said it. 

Hurts is going to take this team to the NFC Championship right now 

Just now, DawkinsOwnage03 said:

Hurts is going to take this team to the NFC Championship right now 

This team better make the NFCCG. It's likely only going to take one win to get there. 

In case no one has ever noticed, I never weigh in on all the RTK nonsense that drags this board down. But I will interject here to set the record straight. He definitely said "no" when asked if he wanted Foles to win the Super Bowl. At the time, Foles was the starting quarterback of the Eagles. We all saw it. 

Huh, the Seahawks waived released SIdney Jones last week. TIL. Guess he's actually not that good after all.

Bucs and Rams are cooked.

Time to step up and dominate the conference.

Carpe diem!

16 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

No.  I clearly stated I hope Foles and the Eagles win the Super Bowl.  And I also clearly stated that if Foles were not on the Eagles but were on some other team, as journeyman often are, then at that time I wouldn't have wanted to see him win a Super Bowl somewhere else.  

Dude, we all remember it as Franklin just stated. Saying you wouldn't want Foles to win a Super Bowl elsewhere is meaningless given the context. You weren't asked about him winning it elsewhere, as no one cared about him winning it elsewhere. He was an Eagle at the time. He was the starter due to Wentz's injury at the time. You were asked if you wanted him to win the Super Bowl, and your first word was "No". You didn't respond with a "No, but", you didn't respond with an attempt to answer something completely different. Your reply started with "No." 

Bucs suck.

Just now, EagleJoe8 said:

Bucs suck.

Crazy how stagnant their offense has become.

Brady is cooked. Their OL is a shell of what it used to be.

I want to play the Bucs in the postseason, get our revenge from last year.

5 minutes ago, EagleJoe8 said:

Dude, we all remember it as Franklin just stated. Saying you wouldn't want Foles to win a Super Bowl elsewhere is meaningless given the context. You weren't asked about him winning it elsewhere, as no one cared about him winning it elsewhere. He was an Eagle at the time. He was the starter due to Wentz's injury at the time. You were asked if you wanted him to win the Super Bowl, and your first word was "No". You didn't respond with a "No, but", you didn't respond with an attempt to answer something completely different. Your reply started with "No." 

This, exactly.