Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

 

Watch out for the stray dogs in his trailer park 

I was thinking a van down by the river but good advice. TY

  • Replies 64k
  • Views 1.9m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Perfect weekend for me. I got to make my long time soul mate my wife officially. And I got a eagles win today. Life is good. 

  • Listen up blog.  Enough. These 2 ass clowns are suspended for 2 weeks.  They've both had warnings to quit the personal attacks.  There's a line between trash talk and just abusing other posters a

Posted Images

29 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

@LeanMeanGM

Put me down at Eagles 27-Skins 13

Covey has a PR longer than 10 yards.

:roll:

 

 

 

:huh:

 

 

 

:blink:

 

You serious Clark?

 

Just now, B3 said:

:roll:

 

 

 

:huh:

 

 

 

:blink:

 

You serious Clark?

 

They're called bold predictions for a reason.  Shoot for the moon!

23 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

Geez, can they please just give Trey Sermon a chance?

I'm not anti Trey Sermon, but why?

2 minutes ago, RLC said:

I'm not anti Trey Sermon, but why?

Just want to see a RB with a different skillset.  Boston Scott is down to about 5-6 snaps per game.  What's the harm in seeing what Sermon can do in 5-6 snaps?

Shaun Bradley more dad than LB

 

2 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

Just want to see a RB with a different skillset.  Boston Scott is down to about 5-6 snaps per game.  What's the harm in seeing what Sermon can do in 5-6 snaps?

I'd be fine with that, but Sermon hasn't shown to be reliable in pass protection. Also, because of Hurts, we don't need 4 RBs active. So he's insurance.

I wish we could replace Scott with a clearly better RB. We're just waiting to unleash Scott on the Giants

1 minute ago, RLC said:

I'd be fine with that, but Sermon hasn't shown to be reliable in pass protection. Also, because of Hurts, we don't need 4 RBs active. So he's insurance.

I wish we could replace Scott with a clearly better RB. We're just waiting to unleash Scott on the Giants

I would activate him over Scott.  He's jus underwhelming.  Sermon may be just as much but I'd rather see an unknown than keep trotting out the same.

Scott when the Eagles play the Giants:

 

HzEXTom.jpg

Which one of you is McNabb? He’s obviously reading the board.

56 minutes ago, Next_Up said:

Like I wrote last time you posted a similar question, post your address and phone number. I will call when I am outside your house.

no politics

42 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

 

Watch out for the stray dogs in his trailer park 

we got a chinese restaurant near by, all the dogs have disappeared

I think some probably have an inflated view of Sermon. He's okay, but not what some think he is.

1 minute ago, schuy7 said:

I think some probably have an inflated view of Sermon. He's okay, but not what some think he is.

I just think it’s weird we always carry guys that never get a shot. I know we don’t see practices or see how they are in meetings but if they are so bad in those that they don’t get to play ever, why are we even bothering carrying them?

5 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

I just think it’s weird we always carry guys that never get a shot. I know we don’t see practices or see how they are in meetings but if they are so bad in those that they don’t get to play ever, why are we even bothering carrying them?

Because if an RB gets hurt, Sermon is worth activating. RB is also a fragile position, so it's likely the #4 RB plays at some point.

2 minutes ago, RLC said:

Because if an RB gets hurt, Sermon is worth activating. RB is also a fragile position, so it's likely the #4 RB plays at some point.

I’m not talking about just Sermon. We carried Holyfield around all last year and even when Sanders and Howard were hurt he still didn’t play at all. 

How did they make sure McNabb was sober for this?

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

I’m not talking about just Sermon. We carried Holyfield around all last year and even when Sanders and Howard were hurt he still didn’t play at all. 

Carrying Holyfield and not playing him when they were hurt. You're right.

Maybe we'll take Eno?

 

NFL+ not being allowed to stream on laptop or TV is stupid. 

Troy Aikman looks like he is in the middle of a week-long bender.

21 minutes ago, schuy7 said:

I think some probably have an inflated view of Sermon. He's okay, but not what some think he is.

I have no expectations for him to be the next coming of Jay Ajayi or anything.  I just want to see what he has to offer.  We know what Boston Scott is and he's been anything but impressive this year.  He's getting 5-7 snaps per game.  Why not at least see what Sermon can do?  Even if he's OK, he brings a different OK dimension than Scott's OK.

1 minute ago, WentzFan11 said:

NFL+ not being allowed to stream on laptop or TV is stupid. 

It's why I got rid of it. Can't cast to TV, can't play on PC. Worthless.

1 minute ago, metal said:

It's why I got rid of it. Can't cast to TV, can't play on PC. Worthless.

It’s okay. I’ll use the 7 day trial and then delete it lol. Hurry up Amazon!

4 hours ago, DrPhilly said:

You ever hear of man boobs?  Not suggesting any gender per se, but anything is possible these days.

Yeah, well Moobs aren't in my wheelhouse...

Not that there's anything wrong with that...:whistle:

4 hours ago, DaEagles4Life said:

Tell me how Brady knew Sam was stealing customer funds and giving them to Alameda. 

I don’t want to venture too far from the discussion of the application of the personal conduct policy but you did ask me a question.  I was a big fan of Glass Stegall Act and thought the chipping away allowing retail banks to have direct communication with the investment bank side was a huge mistake as the 2008 financial crisis proved with some carve back toward Glass Stegall with the Dodd Frank Act.  For years, there was an issue with brokerage firms and what fiduciary duty they had to clients as there were incidences where brokerages were pushing clients to purchase stocks and securities that would benefit the brokerage.  This resulted in the Best Interest Regulation.  Given what FTX’s business is and what Ambassador’s business is, one would think Brady and Giselle would have inquired as to what safeguards were in place to avoid such potential conflict and intermingling.  Can’t say Tom did know but also cannot say he did his due diligence either.  Seems Roger would want to know.  Of course by the time Roger finished any investigation, TB would likely be retired. 

3 hours ago, mattwill said:

I think that proposition needs to be tested ... RTK is a Boob.

Haha...so is Boobie...

Hope we get to talk about him A LOT tonight...:Eagle_smiley: