42 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

Why is Wallace a minus off of the field? Also it's not a thing because he's under contract with NO. 

Because he offers nothing in the locker room or community. And most fans could give a 💩 about him and is essentially a whipping boy as of late. At best, neutral. I was more accentuating that he's a minus compared to Jenkins. And doesn't offer any upside so why keep him?

6 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Gotta love the Washington team, never seen a team pay so many guys that were retired 

I think at one point they were paying Bruce Smith for something like 5 years after he retired and Mark carrier the Safety not the WR for something like 3 seasons after he retired 

They had a couple other guys too, I forgot that Deion ever played for them.

So was he officially retired when he wanted to play for the raiders or was he still in Washingtons active roster and just wanted to be released?

Having said that I'm not sure Jenkins has the clout Prime time did, and if he did then he wouldnt be as sucky as Toronto claims he is, which was the point I was trying to and obviously failed to make 🤷‍♂️

Retired. He was out of football for almost 2 years when he wanted to come back to play for Oakland. 

I'm not saying anyone will or would. Just that they could. And for the place this team is in, I wouldn't expect teams to just willingly help the Eagles if they have options in place to not to.

1 minute ago, NCiggles said:

He reminds me of Rich Miano.  

Michael Zordich.

Andrew Sendejo is out there for the taking with no loopholes!!!

27 minutes ago, Utebird said:

I simply said I'd take Jenkins over Wallace.

Wouldn't you???

No

Just now, Iggles_Phan said:

The bolded part of the question you wrote pretty much calls CJGJ divisive, as he's the guy leading the NFL in INTs.  So, if that wasn't you intended, your message was muddled from your intent.

I didnt bold it 

Yes my message was muddled which is my fault.

I was trying to make a point, obviously I failed on multiple levels.

Having said that I don't think CGJ is divisive, in fact I wouldn't even call him outspoken.

So far I haven't seen him talk a lot on or off the field at least not enough to notice, maybe he's over shadowed by Graham, love that dude but damn dude never shuts up 😄

With Goedert out, one has to wonder why Chad Lewis hasn't gotten a call yet.

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Andrew Sendejo is out there for the taking with no loopholes!!!

Avante Maddox might just retire rather than return if Sendejo were signed.

1 minute ago, Utebird said:

I didnt bold it 

Yes my message was muddled which is my fault.

I was trying to make a point, obviously I failed on multiple levels.

Having said that I don't think CGJ is divisive, in fact I wouldn't even call him outspoken.

So far I haven't seen him talk a lot on or off the field at least not enough to notice, maybe he's over shadowed by Graham, love that dude but damn dude never shuts up 😄

I bolded it, to highlight it.  And that's where the muddle came in.  It seemed you were calling him divisive and there were some rumblings about that from the Saints, but nothing was ever specifically noted other than being unhappy with their extension offer, that I recall.

2 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Retired. He was out of football for almost 2 years when he wanted to come back to play for Oakland. 

I'm not saying anyone will or would. Just that they could. And for the place this team is in, I wouldn't expect teams to just willingly help the Eagles if they options in place to not to.

I'm not even saying the eagles should or could sign Jenkins, in simply saying if they did he'd be an upgrade over Wallace so I'd be all for it.

That's all I meant to say, apparently that rubbed some the wrong way, not sure why?

Jenkins was a good eagle, Wallace sadly is not 

And I really liked him when drafted had high hopes for him but he's been a huge disappointment☹️

2 minutes ago, Swoop said:

With Goedert out, one has to wonder why Chad Lewis hasn't gotten a call yet.

Come on. At least be realistic. 

 

 

 

Brent Celek! It's no coincidence we've been holding #87 open for years

3 minutes ago, Swoop said:

No

Why not I mean I'd take your mom over Wallace...😁

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

Come on. At least be realistic. 

 

 

 

Brent Celek! It's no coincidence we've been holding #87 open for years

 

If we sign John Lynch do you think we will get a discount on some 49ers players?

5 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Michael Zordich.

Zordich filled the role of veteran leader really well.   Miano was a tremendous bust. I always liked that defense with Zordich, Greg Jackson, William Fuller, Kurt Goviea, Ronnie Dixon.   Ray Rhodes did a good job of bridging the gap with veterans he knew.  

1 minute ago, Iggles_Phan said:

I bolded it, to highlight it.  And that's where the muddle came in.  It seemed you were calling him divisive and there were some rumblings about that from the Saints, but nothing was ever specifically noted other than being unhappy with their extension offer, that I recall.

I don't follow other teams as closely as I used to and before the trade I had very little knowledge of who CGJ was, everything I know about him I either read on line or here and as you said seems most of his discontent was over his contract.

He's been a revelation since being here, one if the best trades Howie has ever made.

Eagles need more players as passionate as him and less bums like Wallace.

18 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

Was Davion Taylor a good special teamer? Might be worth a call up. On that note, I don’t think I’ve seen Dean make a single play of ST this year. 

I think Taylor did OK last season.  Dean hasn't done much.  Bradley has also been quiet as of late too.  

4 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

Zordich filled the role of veteran leader really well.   Miano was a tremendous bust. I always liked that defense with Zordich, Greg Jackson, William Fuller, Kurt Goviea, Ronnie Dixon.   Ray Rhodes did a good job of bridging the gap with veterans he knew.  

Yup rhodes did really well with bringing in the vets but horrible at replacing them. 

7 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Why not I mean I'd take your mom over Wallace...😁

Ah, didn't know you were fifteen.

Now the idiocy and weird idolization of Jenkins makes sense.

14 minutes ago, jojodancer said:

Because he offers nothing in the locker room or community. And most fans could give a 💩 about him and is essentially a whipping boy as of late. At best, neutral. I was more accentuating that he's a minus compared to Jenkins. And doesn't offer any upside so why keep him?

So some assumptions

15 minutes ago, jojodancer said:

Because he offers nothing in the locker room or community. And most fans could give a 💩 about him and is essentially a whipping boy as of late. At best, neutral. I was more accentuating that he's a minus compared to Jenkins. And doesn't offer any upside so why keep him?

I'm not sure I would call him a whipping boy, the critiques of him are valid. The defense has a noticeable drop off when he comes in that I didn't notice with Blankenship.

7 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

I bolded it, to highlight it.  And that's where the muddle came in.  It seemed you were calling him divisive and there were some rumblings about that from the Saints, but nothing was ever specifically noted other than being unhappy with their extension offer, that I recall.

Well, he called Michael Thomas "Slant Boy" so much that he punched him in practice. 

He also got in multiple on field fights. There was also a lot of questions about character concerns when he was drafted, which might have caused him to drop. I was big into him that year. 

Just now, Swoop said:

Ah, didn't know you were fifteen.

Now the idiocy and weird idolization of Jenkins makes sense.

Who says mom jokes are limited to 15 year olds?

Who says I idolize Jenkins.

Why did you think K von Wallace is better than a 35 year old Jenkins???

42 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Never said CGJ was divisive.

You said Jenkins was I said CGJ was outspoken and you said he leads the league in INT.

As for the last part never said any of that either.

I simply said I'd take Jenkins over Wallace.

Wouldn't you???

So far the only reason you've come up with is be ause you think he's divisive.

At first you said he was too old, I showed you lots of safeties play past 35, you then said yeah but none of those guys retired then came back, another poster said weddle did, you then said weddle got hurt to which I responded Jenkins doesn't have much of an injury history, to which you replied he was divisive and outspoken to which I responded CGJ is outspoken to which you called me a bish to which I told you to go get lit to which you claimed I called CGJ divisive which I didn't and then you called me illogical and a couple other names.

But hey yeah keep saying g I said things I didn't then when you feel you're fine gi smoke that joint brah...😒

Well if anybody had any questions about your reading comprehension, you’ve answered it all in this post. 
 

Gotta love posters who make vague statements and then when you pin them down on it, back pedal and claim "I never said that exact thing!” 

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Well, he called Michael Thomas "Slant Boy" so much that he punched him in practice. 

He also got in multiple on field fights. There was also a lot of questions about character concerns when he was drafted, which might have caused him to drop. I was big into him that year. 

He wasn't wrong about Mike Thomas, that dudes a turd 

Seems philly is a better fit for CGJ👍