2 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

I already said you were right on this point. It's just unfortunate that only the niners were allowed to warm up but not the Ravens. Shame, really 

When you're intentionally missing the point, that's when I'm done wasting my time.

19 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

Power outages are magical, apparently 

So you don’t understand the difference between special teams and offense. Makes sense

Ok so we've now established that halftimes helped only the Ravens special teams but hurt the Niners special teams. But then the blackout hurt the entire Ravens team and helped the entire Niners team. Duly noted. 

12 minutes ago, Swoop said:

When you're intentionally missing the point, that's when I'm done wasting my time.

But it's been so well spent up until now, you sure you don't want to reconsider?

20 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Any good Urologist will tell you that.  Good plumbers will tell you that too.

Stop

It's sad that a disagreement about events can't happen without personal attacks on someone holding the opposite viewpoint.  

 

 

Doesn't sound great 

2 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

It's sad that a disagreement about events can't happen without personal attacks on someone holding the opposite viewpoint.  

 

 

When one side is arguing in bad faith, using straw men and being purposefully obtuse,  all that’s left are personal attacks

2 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

When one side is arguing in bad faith, using straw men and being purposefully obtuse,  all that’s left are personal attacks

Bro - you're arguing about a blackout, that happened 10 years, helping a running QB in a way to discredit Hurts.  

Show me on the doll where Jalen Hurts hurt you  

1 minute ago, mikemack8 said:

Bro - you're arguing about a blackout, that happened 10 years, helping a running QB in a way to discredit Hurts.  

Show me on the doll where Jalen Hurts hurt you  

The discussion has nothing to do with Hurts

Just now, TorontoEagle said:

The argument has nothing to do with Hurts

5 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

When one side is arguing in bad faith, using straw men and being purposefully obtuse,  all that’s left are personal attacks

Thankfully you didn't argue in bad faith or use strawmen either.

Just now, we_gotta_believe said:

Thankfully you didn't argue in bad faith or use strawmen either.

Point them out. I provided primary sources and a logical argument. 

4 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

No.  I was serious.  Getting a colonoscopy.  

That’s the opposite of the desired effect.  

So much fun wrapped in so much ignominy. 

Hope for you that all goes like ish through a goose.

 

7 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

When one side is arguing in bad faith, using straw men and being purposefully obtuse,  all that’s left are personal attacks

Actually, if you feel that's the way it is going, you can just bow out of the argument.  

2 minutes ago, mikemack8 said:

What does the blackout causing the Ravens to lose all momentum in that game have to do with Hurts? 

Just now, Iggles_Phan said:

Actually, if you feel that's the way it is going, you can just bow out of the argument.  

Where’s the fun in that?

2 hours ago, TorontoEagle said:

Sure, you believe what you want. 
 

San Fran put up 6 points in the first half, had multiple turnovers, and were down 28-6. Then the blackout happened and they rallied back. Those are just the facts. Logic would dictate the blackout had some effect on that game 

^Not a strawman

2 hours ago, TorontoEagle said:

Yes psychology has no place in sports. You’ve obviously never played a competitive sport

^Definitely not a strawman or an argument in bad faith

3 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

What does the blackout causing the Ravens to lose all momentum in that game have to do with Hurts? 

This argument started with this post

3 hours ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Kaep came pretty damn close to getting a ring. If Hurts can get us that close, I won't complain. Lots of other things can happen over the course of a game to tip the scales in your favor when it's that close.

 

3 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

^Not a strawman

^Definitely not a strawman or an argument in bad faith

This was after you called the blackout magical and another doofus talked about pixie dust. 

1 minute ago, mikemack8 said:

This argument started with this post

 

Discussions evolve, though not for simpletons like you 

its a hell of a day at sea sir!

Hasty HOF taking a back seat 

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Hasty HOF taking a back seat 

Damn i had just acquired hasty as my starting Rb in multiple fantasy leagues. 

9 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

This was after you called the blackout magical and another doofus talked about pixie dust. 

Discussions evolve, though not for simpletons like you 

Right.  So you decided to "evolve" the discussion purely because you wanted to prove that the Ravens would have won by, what, 4 touchdowns had the blackout not happened?  Not sure what point you're trying to prove here.  Oh wait, yes I am, you just don't have the balls to admit it.  Puss. 

1 minute ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Bully

You're right - I apologize.  I forgot how soft he can be.  

7 minutes ago, mikemack8 said:

Right.  So you decided to "evolve" the discussion purely because you wanted to prove that the Ravens would have won by, what, 4 touchdowns had the blackout not happened?  Not sure what point you're trying to prove here.  Oh wait, yes I am, you just don't have the balls to admit it.  Puss. 

WGB is of the belief that Kaep rallied the team back and almost won. My argument was simply the blackout is the main reason he was able to rally back. WGB doesn’t think the blackout had an effect. 
 

So please, insert whatever thing you wanna say about Hurts now, but he had nothing to do with the discussion we were having

Good Morning Ladies! This is a special season right here. Keeping my eyes on the prize. The rest is noise. Fixing to be 11-1.