Bummer about Quinn, but his addition was always about the playoffs anyway. 

We've been unlucky injury wise since the bye. Basically losing a good starter or reliable role player per game.

Game7 - Steelers: Davis (IR)
Game 8 - Texans: Maddox (IR)
Game 9 - Wash: Goedert (IR)
Game 11- Packers: CGJ (IR)
Game 12: Titans: Quinn (IR)

1 hour ago, Sack that QB said:

All that recruiting for nothing. He got a free meal and some Mavs tickets at least!

I’m shocked. Who would have thought?  Jerry changing his tune.  

2 minutes ago, RLC said:

Bummer about Quinn, but his addition was always about the playoffs anyway. 

We've been unlucky injury wise since the bye. Basically losing a good starter or reliable role player per game.

Game7 - Steelers: Davis (IR)
Game 8 - Texans: Maddox (IR)
Game 9 - Wash: Goedert (IR)
Game 11- Packers: CGJ (IR)
Game 12: Titans: Quinn (IR)

Disagree. We've been incredibly lucky injury wise. Everyone listed is likely coming back, most coming back after missing the bare minimum. On top of that we generally don't have many players missing a game here or there. Very different from teams across the league. 

Baker to the Rams 

 

4 minutes ago, RLC said:

Bummer about Quinn, but his addition was always about the playoffs anyway. 

We've been unlucky injury wise since the bye. Basically losing a good starter or reliable role player per game.

Game7 - Steelers: Davis (IR)
Game 8 - Texans: Maddox (IR)
Game 9 - Wash: Goedert (IR)
Game 11- Packers: CGJ (IR)
Game 12: Titans: Quinn (IR)

Meh all those guys are coming back though. We’ve been very fortunate this year injury wise

Just now, TorontoEagle said:

Baker to the Rams 

Let Baker bake 

2 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Disagree. We've been incredibly lucky injury wise. Everyone listed is likely coming back, most coming back after missing the bare minimum. On top of that we generally don't have many players missing a game here or there. Very different from teams across the league. 

This

9 minutes ago, RLC said:

Bummer about Quinn, but his addition was always about the playoffs anyway. 

We've been unlucky injury wise since the bye. Basically losing a good starter or reliable role player per game.

Game7 - Steelers: Davis (IR)
Game 8 - Texans: Maddox (IR)
Game 9 - Wash: Goedert (IR)
Game 11- Packers: CGJ (IR)
Game 12: Titans: Quinn (IR)

What's the bummer?  He hasn't done a thing for this team.  I'd rather them just cut their losses to be honest.  Nothing about what he's done has shown me he's going to turn it on for the playoffs.  Even before the Eagles traded for him, he had 6 tackles and 1 sack for the Bears.  Didn't like the trade when they made it, don't like it now. 

That is wild. He looked cooked for the start of next year

13 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Disagree. We've been incredibly lucky injury wise. Everyone listed is likely coming back, most coming back after missing the bare minimum. On top of that we generally don't have many players missing a game here or there. Very different from teams across the league. 

 

12 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

Meh all those guys are coming back though. We’ve been very fortunate this year injury wise

 

12 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

Baker to the Rams 

 

12 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

 

Get outta my head!

Just now, TorontoEagle said:

 

 

 

Get outta my head!

Hopefully people don't start realizing you're my clone account 

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

Hopefully people don't start realizing you're my clone account 

That’s so Julian 

With the waiving of Chachere, I'm guessing they plan on claiming Anthony Harris. Can't see them going with just 3 safeties, 1 one of them being Wallace, with the uncertainty of when CJGJ will return. 

Could be for Maddox, but I'd be surprised if they opened up a spot today for him since he hasn't practiced yet on his hammy. Chachere could perhaps go to the PS, but they are out of elevations for him. 

14 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

Rather have Chachere on the roster for his ST instead of Wallace.

Tryout Tuesday.  

A small draft nuance that I just noticed.

Picks 19-24 are where the first round playoff losers land.  If you have the #1 seed, you can't end up in draft slots 19-24.

 

EDITED

2 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

A small draft nuance that I just noticed.

Picks 21-24 are where the first round playoff losers land.  If you have the #1 seed, you can't end up in draft slots 21-24.

Wouldn't first round losers be 19 - 22?

Just now, Connecticut Eagle said:

A small draft nuance that I just noticed.

Picks 21-24 are where the first round playoff losers land.  If you have the #1 seed, you can't end up in draft slots 21-24.

3 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Wouldn't first round losers be 19 - 22?

Damn 7th seed!!!!

Actually 19-24.  There are 6 first-round games.

I'd guess they want Chachere back on the PS and will use the roster slot on Ellllisssssssss or a PS pick from another team.  I am surprised that Sermon is still hanging around on the roster

Just now, Connecticut Eagle said:

Damn 7th seed!!!!

Screwed me up too. It would be 19-24, so your point still stands.

1 hour ago, Sack that QB said:

All that recruiting for nothing. He got a free meal and some Mavs tickets at least!

Embarrassing! Especially after Diggs, Parsons  and the whole Mavs fan base were groveling to him at the game last nite. He wasn't gonna be ready to contribute much this year.  And wasn't worth more than taking a flyer on. We can always hope the Giants are desperate AF and think he can come back next year and sign him to a long term deal, not worrying if he contributes this year. #3 Slot receiver at this point is his future...

 

4 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

That defense could probably get them in the playoffs

 

I still believe we'd beat anyone in the NFC

30 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

That is wild. He looked cooked for the start of next year

 

8 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

You're living life on a 30 min delay!