1 hour ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Eagles should do an all white uniform as an alternate jersey with yellow face masks so they look like bald eagles. 

 

4 minutes ago, mattwill said:

I could be wrong, but I don't think your picture is Kelly Green.  I believe you have one of the darker shades of green.

Randall wore KG his entire Eagles career.  

15 minutes ago, Arthur Jackson said:

 

18 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

RTK is so mad watching this

You guys are falling into the same trap he did. If Hurts actually helps us win it all, do you really want to be on that side of the fence like he was after Foles hoisted the trophy?

18 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

You guys are falling into the same trap he did. If Hurts actually helps us win it all, do you really want to be on that side of the fence like he was after Foles hoisted the trophy?

 

What side of the fence was I on? I was elated we won the Super Bowl.  I just wanted the Eagles to move on from him and get good value in a trade while they could while removing the elephant in the room so it didn't mess with the psyche of Wentz.  

17 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

You guys are falling into the same trap he did. If Hurts actually helps us win it all, do you really want to be on that side of the fence like he was after Foles hoisted the trophy?

I don't think there's anyone on the EMB who has the level of disdain for Hurts that reaches the point where they don't want the team to win because of his presence.  RTK did get banned by the moderators, after all.  He married himself to an erroneous position, and put his opinion as more important than the team's success.

17 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

You guys are falling into the same trap he did. If Hurts actually helps us win it all, do you really want to be on that side of the fence like he was after Foles hoisted the trophy?

Wrong. 
 

We want Hurts to succeed. We just didn’t think he’d be this good. We were wrong. 

5 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

We were wrong. 

??? About what

4 hours ago, LeanMeanGM said:

 

Not to defend Snyder but the focus of this tweet is misplaced. Reporters often make too much of answers like "I don’t know” or "I don’t recall” without considering the question presented and standing on its own.  Too often in deposing witnesses, the interrogators ask too detailed questions.  "On September 12, 2003, did you proposition Jane Doe”, for example.  Without looking at a calendar, few of us could recall what day of the week September 12 was 19:years ago. Most of us couldn’t tell you what day of the week it was in 2022, from memory.  Frankly, there were probably many things most of us did within the last three months that we would be hard pressed to say which month it was. Since someone is under oath to testify truthfully, the truthful answer to this flawed question would not be yes or no, if the person didn’t recall propositioning Jane Doe on September 12th.    The person has to answer the question as presented. The person giving testimony is under no obligation to help the person making the query in formulating the right question, which would be "did you ever proposition Jane Doe.”  

An understanding of memory in testifying was clearly spelled out when John Dean testified in the Watergate hearings and later tapes from those actual conversations were made available and demonstrated how memory can be distorted.   "Memory is probably the worst way to reconstruct history as possible,” Dean said. "We all have highly fallible memories. There’s nothing that beats explaining Nixon’s behavior on Watergate better than the tapes, because they’re real time.”

31 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

You guys are falling into the same trap he did. If Hurts actually helps us win it all, do you really want to be on that side of the fence like he was after Foles hoisted the trophy?

I’m not? I also have never and will never root for Hurts to get injured. 

4 minutes ago, Aerolithe_Lion said:

??? About what

About how good Hurts could be. He’s been mostly fantastic this season, and played far better than I ever thought he could’ve coming into the year

15 minutes ago, Alphagrand said:

I don't think there's anyone on the EMB who has the level of disdain for Hurts that reaches the point where they don't want the team to win because of his presence.  RTK did get banned by the moderators, after all.  He married himself to an erroneous position, and put his opinion as more important than the team's success.

 

I never wanted the Eagles to not win because of Foles.  Take your lying BS and shove it up your Fing ass.  

2 hours ago, bpac55 said:

I understand what they are trying to do but if ANY of that water actually hits the player I'd be shocked. 

 

Catching punts in the rain?

5 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

I never wanted the Eagles to not win because of Foles.  Take your lying BS and shove it up your Fing ass.  

He’s not lying dude 

13 minutes ago, BigEFly said:

Not to defend Snyder but the focus of this tweet is misplaced. Reporters often make too much of answers like "I don’t know” or "I don’t recall” without considering the question presented and standing on its own.  Too often in deposing witnesses, the interrogators ask too detailed questions.  "On September 12, 2003, did you proposition Jane Doe”, for example.  Without looking at a calendar, few of us could recall what day of the week September 12 was 19:years ago. Most of us couldn’t tell you what day of the week it was in 2022, from memory.  Frankly, there were probably many things most of us did within the last three months that we would be hard pressed to say which month it was. Since someone is under oath to testify truthfully, the truthful answer to this flawed question would not be yes or no, if the person didn’t recall propositioning Jane Doe on September 12th.    The person has to answer the question as presented. The person giving testimony is under no obligation to help the person making the query in formulating the right question, which would be "did you ever proposition Jane Doe.”  

An understanding of memory in testifying was clearly spelled out when John Dean testified in the Watergate hearings and later tapes from those actual conversations were made available and demonstrated how memory can be distorted.   "Memory is probably the worst way to reconstruct history as possible,” Dean said. "We all have highly fallible memories. There’s nothing that beats explaining Nixon’s behavior on Watergate better than the tapes, because they’re real time.”

Was mostly posting because I thought someone testifying it was Snyder who leaked out the emails that got Gruden fired was the interesting part. 

Just now, EaglePhan1986 said:

He’s not lying dude 

 

He is lying.  I've never rooted against the Eagles because of him and I have never stated that.  The only thing I have ever said is I wouldn't like to see him win a Super Bowl if he were on any other team but since he was the QB for the Eagles of course I want to see them win the Super Bowl.  

3 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

He is lying.  I've never rooted against the Eagles because of him and I have never stated that.  The only thing I have ever said is I wouldn't like to see him win a Super Bowl if he were on any other team but since he was the QB for the Eagles of course I want to see them win the Super Bowl.  

29 minutes ago, Alphagrand said:

I don't think there's anyone on the EMB who has the level of disdain for Hurts that reaches the point where they don't want the team to win because of his presence.  RTK did get banned by the moderators, after all.  He married himself to an erroneous position, and put his opinion as more important than the team's success.

Not to that level, no, but sure seems like some here are on a path to being married to the position that Hurts is a garbage QB. Which may or may not prove to be accurate, but I'm just cautioning against going all in on that because of how this season might ultimately turn out.

32 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

Wrong. 
 

We want Hurts to succeed. We just didn’t think he’d be this good. We were wrong. 

My apologies, I didn't realize you spoke for everyone. 

6 hours ago, eagle45 said:

You might be right, but that backup would probably be a pick from round 5 or lower.

I would argue that a team with SB aspirations and a qb that runs the most in the nfl should probably have a backup that is more proven than a 5th round rookie.

I wouldn’t be surprised if we picked a quarterback in the first three rounds… If not this year, then the following year.  Howie likes his QBs

11 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

My apologies, I didn't realize you spoke for everyone. 

I forgive you

 

1 hour ago, Arthur Jackson said:

a toboggan is actually a hat

 

1 hour ago, BigEFly said:

Catching punts in the rain?

right, like I said, I know what they are trying to accomplish...just don't think their method is doing anything.

Can you imagine if the Eagles never lose another game this season, how much bragging the Commander fans will do that they gave the Eagles their only loss.

Let's not let the NY Giants have any bragging rights to add to that.