1 minute ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Third game of a road trip is always hard. Eagles beat the saints in 2020 on the third leg of the 3 game road trip. The short week really doesn’t help in matters. Kind of BS the nfl gave us 3 games all on the road and the last on a short week. In hindsight should’ve made Dallas/eagles a Xmas day SNF game compared to what they have now

Our first game was a bus ride.

The league subtly accounts for the fact that we get to avoid two plane rides for road games every season.  A bus to the Giants and a train to the team in DC. 

Sarcastaball

Bras and **** with that personal foul on Herbert 

18 minutes ago, schuy7 said:

I'd be shocked if he doesn't. He's the kind of guy and player they like to keep around. AJ will be a few years older by the time you start paying DeVonta a high salary.

Sure but at what price? I’m hoping the Eagles are able to draft a WR at some point the next two drafts that has starter potential. 

16 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

That is not immediately.  It has to be one motion, and intentional as a drop kick.  That was not.  

You're wrong

3 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

His success for us in 2022 leads to a better comp pick for us in 2024.

Win-win

Yeah, it could... depending on what FAs we bring in and what kind of contract Sanders signs. I think more teams are realizing signing RBs to big 2nd contracts is a bad idea. 

Either way, RBs are replaceable. 

3 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

Our first game was a bus ride.

The league subtly accounts for the fact that we get to avoid two plane rides for road games every season.  A bus to the Giants and a train to the team in DC. 

it’s still 3 road games in a row. Bus or train you are still not at home. And you still are getting the short end of the stick on the third road game of the trip which is the longest trek of the 3 and even before the season would’ve said the most difficult 

Tua 3-17, this is insane

 

Ive never seen a QB this inaccurate, much less an MVP candidate

Hes flirting with Josh Freeman territory

 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201310210nyg.htm

1 minute ago, schuy7 said:

Yeah, it could... depending on what FAs we bring in and what kind of contract Sanders signs. I think more teams are realizing signing RBs to big 2nd contracts is a bad idea. 

Either way, RBs are replaceable. 

The fact that our two FAs on offense are at the easiest positions to fill, RB and OG, is a real advantage as we address the numerous positions on D that need filling.

save the neck for me clark

11 minutes ago, Nivraga said:

No you are wrong. 

 

The drop kick came under controversy in 2019, after Justin Tucker of the Baltimore Ravens used the maneuver on a kickoff late in a game against the Kansas City Chiefs. The drop kick was intended to force the Chiefs to fair catch the ball, preventing them from running out the clock. As 2:01 was showing on the game clock and a fair-caught kickoff does not run any time off the clock, it would force the Chiefs to run a play before the two-minute warning. Several weeks after the kick, league offices claimed the maneuver was illegal. Ravens head coach John Harbaugh disputed this, noting that they had cleared it with the NFL before using the drop kick and were not penalized by the in-game officials. The NFL's statement claimed that the ball was not kicked immediately after the bounce. Tucker made his approach and dropped the ball to the ground. He did not like the bounce and picked the ball up, retreating back for a second approach and dropped the ball a second time before kicking it. The NFL's statement suggested a false start should have been called on Tucker for not kicking the ball on the first drop. An article on CBS Sports stated that the NFL had made a midseason rule change banning the drop kick, but no statement from the NFL has ever confirmed this.^[20] It was later clarified that Tucker's drop kick action was illegal because he did not kick the ball "immediately" after the ball touched the ground. Rather, Tucker threw the ball upwards, allowed it to drop to the ground, then kicked the ball as it was falling from its apex after bouncing.

 

But the explanation is in here. The bounce is legal as long as it is kicked on the way up before it's apex. Once it starts falling it can no longer be kicked legally. The Giants punter kicked the ball as it was descending making it illegal.

 

Thanks for playing.

Imagine continuing to be more and more wrong. Keep digging that hole 

Man, Hill is just ridiculous.

Tyreek hill single-handedly trying to beat the chargers. 

Why do I get the feeling the Chargers are going to lose this game?

Just now, Alphagrand said:

Why do I get the feeling the Chargers are going to lose this game?

It’s in their DNA. 

1 minute ago, TorontoEagle said:

Imagine continuing to be more and more wrong. Keep digging that hole 

Oh so now I show the explanation and you can't admit you were wrong.  

You're the one with the shovel. 

The problem with poor baby 2021 Herbert theory is you have to accept that there was no possible way he could have beaten:

The 4-13 Texans

The 7-10 Broncos twice (he split)

The 8-9 Vikings

He had 2 #1 WRs, a stud dual threat RB, and a decent TE. I think his line had a mediocre to bad RT maybe?

12 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

Sure but at what price? I’m hoping the Eagles are able to draft a WR at some point the next two drafts that has starter potential. 

Who knows. He's under contract for 3 more years essentially. He'd get a decent deal for sure.

Just now, SkippyX said:

The problem with poor baby 2021 Herbert theory is you have to accept that there was no possible way he could have beaten:

The 4-13 Texans

The 7-10 Broncos twice (he split)

The 8-9 Vikings

He had 2 #1 WRs, a stud dual threat RB, and a decent TE. I think his line had a mediocre to bad RT maybe?

Their defense gave up 34 in that game. I’m sorry but if you are giving up 34 points to the Texans that’s a big issue. 

16 minutes ago, Nivraga said:

No you are wrong. 

 

^20] It was later clarified that Tucker's drop kick action was illegal because he did not kick the ball "immediately" after the ball touched the ground. Rather, Tucker threw the ball upwards, allowed it to drop to the ground, then kicked the ball as it was falling from its apex after bouncing.

 

 

2 minutes ago, Nivraga said:

Oh so now I show the explanation and you can't admit you were wrong.  

You're the one with the shovel. 

Read what you post instead of copying and pasting. What tucker did was illegal

Dicker!

3 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Their defense gave up 34 in that game. I’m sorry but if you are giving up 34 points to the Texans that’s a big issue. 

So poor baby is 33 points good?

3 FGs and 2 picks instead of TDs on some of those drives turns that game around but it was the Texans so no shot for that poor baby.

Seeing several throws by Herbert that are inaccurate and way off. He's playing well overall, but they want to be on his jock and that's that. Tua looks like Brad Goebel's grandmother out there. Turrible!

7 minutes ago, D-Shiznit said:

I think Hargrave's future might depend on who we draft. If we draft Carter or Bursee, they might just let him walk.

I'd be fine extending Hargrave. But another option I'd like is Daron Payne in FA. Only 25 and really coming into his own now. Him combined with Davis as a duo has elite potential. With Cox and Hargrave going they could allocate their money towards that contract. Hopefully Saints pick is around 5, could go Myles Murphy for DE right there. Pretty strong and powerful additions. 

3 minutes ago, jojodancer said:

Seeing several throws by Herbert that are inaccurate and way off. He's playing well overall, but they want to be on his jock and that's that. Tua looks like Brad Goebel's grandmother out there. Turrible!

I think his line is giving him the jitters but Tua has missed some really easy throws.