These refs have been absolutely abysmal all game. For both teams.  

I'm not sure I like that. I'd decline that penalty. Let them kick a super long FG.

4 minutes ago, SkippyX said:

Its indoors and he already nailed a 50+ earlier. It's just bizarre to not kick the FG.

You get 1ft with a sneak and it is kneel down time.  Odds of hitting a 52yd fg are what, 65 or 70%?  What are the odds of getting 1ft with a QB sneak?  Think I read about 80%

 

 

2 minutes ago, Iggles25 said:

In a dome, and with a kicker 5/5 in FG attempts, I'd think that a 52 yard FG was the higher percentage choice.

Probably 60%. A 4th and 1 should be better.

Just now, DrPhilly said:

You get 1ft with a sneak and it is kneel down time.  Odds of hitting a 52yd fg are what, 65 or 70%?  What are the odds of getting 1ft with a QB sneak?  Think I read about 80%

 

 

Matt Ryan is the variable that leans me to try a FG there.

well colts only need a fg

Colts OL is terrible, not sure they can buy enough time for Ryan to push the ball down field.

A punt?

Sirianni would never.

Neither team deserves a win 

I think Ryan turned a game ending fumble into a recovery for his team by shoving the fumble forward.

Yet another weird play in a game full of them.

1 minute ago, Iggles25 said:

Matt Ryan is the variable that leans me to try a FG there.

No doubt he isn't the optimal choice to run the play.  I'd still go with the sneak.

Teams leading by 30+ are 1548-1-1 in NFL history

Thats how bad the colts are 

Just now, FranklinFldEBUpper said:

Probably 60%. A 4th and 1 should be better.

4th and less than 1 should be one of the highest percentage play in football. The colts are just really really bad. 

Colts... Smh could have beat both Dallas and Minnesota. Hoping they pull this off in ot

3 minutes ago, SkippyX said:

The FG miss gives the Colts the ball at the 46 and a made FG does not win the game. No way.

It doesn't win the game but the colts offense has been putrid.

The colts are not driving down the field and scoring a td to win it

but a fg is more probable

1 minute ago, DEagle7 said:

4th and less than 1 should be one of the highest percentage play in football. The colts are just really really bad. 

Yeah, even Matty ice should have been able to get that one which he arguably did.  Hard to tell when that whistle blew and almost impossible to say when it should have blown.

Gonna be a tie lol

4 minutes ago, FranklinFldEBUpper said:

Probably 60%. A 4th and 1 should be better.

Closer to 70% at 50yds.

https://www.footballperspective.com/nfl-field-goal-rates-from-2014-to-2018/

Nice stretch!

1 minute ago, pisceschica said:

It doesn't win the game but the colts offense has been putrid.

The colts are not driving down the field and scoring a td to win it

The Colts would already be in FG range if they did the same thing they are doing now.

Keep going to Pittman.

Just now, we_gotta_believe said:

Closer to 70% at 50yds.

https://www.footballperspective.com/nfl-field-goal-rates-from-2014-to-2018/

The odds of a decrepit Matt Ryan picking up a yard is very low. 

Colts still have a chance to win this

Just now, SkippyX said:

The Colts would already be in FG range if they did the same thing they are doing now.

but the colts would have to score a td on their drive to win

now they only need a fg

Why do they keep running screens?