1 minute ago, ToastJenkins said:

Then make one that isnt so stupid

What was wrong about my statement? All facts. Youre just being an a-hole. Good tor you

10 minutes ago, MillerTime said:

Aaron Rodgers has 76 yards after the first half. Hurts had 189. Burrow turned the ball over 4 times. Hurts 0. AGENDA

They also didn't trade away Hurts' best WR in the offseason. In fact, they got him a pretty good one. Pretty sure Hurts had both his starting tackles also.

12 minutes ago, MillerTime said:

Aaron Rodgers has 76 yards after the first half. Hurts had 189. Burrow turned the ball over 4 times. Hurts 0. AGENDA

That's a horrible take

1 minute ago, MillerTime said:

What was wrong about my statement? All facts. Youre just being an a-hole. Good tor you

No all opinion. You know nothing of anyones agenda. You contributed nothing so dont get offended when you are ignored and ridiculed.

flacco threw for 300 plus today. Hurts cant even aspire to flacco levels of passing.

14 minutes ago, D-Shiznit said:

There are several people who believe the Earth is flat or that the 2020 election was stolen.

Several people on the internet should never be a barometer for anything.

I believe 2Pac and Biggie are both still alive and chilling on a private island together 😀

1 minute ago, EagleJoe8 said:

They also didn't trade away Hurts' best WR in the offseason. In fact, they got him a pretty good one. Pretty sure Hurts had both his starting tackles also.

So excuses?

what’s Burrows?

Just put on the Chargers game and watch Herbert. If Hurts shows half of that with his arm, I’m content with him being the franchise QB. 

1 minute ago, ToastJenkins said:

If your only argument is to say nefarious motive then you do not belong in the discussion

The agenda is that some are scared that Hurts might show any positives and thus be signed and relegate the Birds to years of mediocrity. It is a Dak Prescott kind of fear and is justified. An average QB can place a franchise in purgatory.  However, on this board, it also results in a kind of alternative reality in which anything Hurts does that is positive is diminished and the negatives are amplified. Likely, it is  because there is no trust in the organization to make the right decision. They did however get rid of Wentz. I have some confidence that they will ultimately make the best decision. 

It is worth noting that it looked like Hurts got his bell rung at 2:37 of Q3. This often results in a decrease in QB effectiveness. 

14 minutes ago, MillerTime said:

Aaron Rodgers has 76 yards after the first half. Hurts had 189. Burrow turned the ball over 4 times. Hurts 0. AGENDA

Now I see your just trying to be a troll

Just now, ToastJenkins said:

No all opinion. You know nothing of anyones agenda. You contributed nothing so dont get offended when you are ignored and ridiculed.

flacco threw for 300 plus today. Hurts cant even aspire to flacco levels of passing.

So Rodgers having 76 yards in the first half and Burrow having 4 turnovers is an opinion?

Just now, MillerTime said:

So excuses?

what’s Burrows?

Bad game. It happens.

Just much more frequently when you have a RB parading around as a QB. 

Call me when Hurts has anywhere near the season Burrow just had.

Outside the dline sucking, Gannon being a fraud, Hurts still can't throw.... I know it's one game but Smith having 4 targets is concerning 

1 minute ago, DeathByEagle said:

Now I see your just trying to be a troll

I'm trying not to engaged 

19 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

Man I wish we had Herbert

Id settle for someone that even just sounds close. Like Hibbert. 

3 minutes ago, Next_Up said:

The agenda is that some are scared that Hurts might show any positives and thus be signed and relegate the Birds to years of mediocrity. It is a Dak Prescott kind of fear and is justified. An average QB can place a franchise in purgatory.  However, on this board, it also results in a kind of alternative reality in which anything Hurts does that is positive is diminished and the negatives are amplified. Likely, it is  because there is no trust in the organization to make the right decision. They did however get rid of Wentz. I have some confidence that they will ultimately make the best decision. 

It is worth noting that it looked like Hurts got his bell rung at 2:37 of Q3. This often results in a decrease in QB effectiveness. 

He was hit illegally 3 times and only 1 was called. Thankfully he didn't get a concussion because that last one looked nasty

Rogers got absolutely popped 

Just now, Mike030270 said:

He was hit illegally 3 times and only 1 was called. Thankfully he didn't get a concussion because that last one looked nasty

I thought he was done after that hit

Is Justin Jefferson the best WR in the NFL?   Yeah, he might be.  

 

 

2 minutes ago, DeathByEagle said:

Now I see your just trying to be a troll

No Im not. Hurts had a good game. He hit multiple throws over the middle. Hit a great pass to Brown deep. No turnover. Oline didnt help. Yet you all expect Rodgers or Burrow from him who both are doing worse. 

1 minute ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Is Justin Jefferson the best WR in the NFL?   Yeah, he might be.  

 

 

He wouldn’t be in our offense

13 minutes ago, CouchKing said:

The Eagles D gave up 35 points.

That’s horrible.

Fire Gannon!

and the Eagles offense only scored 31.

Some no-name guy catches a TD for the Chiefs while wearing #88, and here we are keeping 86 and 87 "retired"

5 minutes ago, Godfather said:

Outside the dline sucking, Gannon being a fraud, Hurts still can't throw.... I know it's one game but Smith having 4 targets is concerning 

I'm trying not to engaged 

AJ Brown isn’t going to catch 10 of 13 targets for 155 yards every week. We scored 31 points. Let’s hold the concern for another week. 

@LeanMeanGM

vikings 44

eagles 24

Jefferson 250 yds, 3 TDs

6 minutes ago, Next_Up said:

The agenda is that some are scared that Hurts might show any positives and thus be signed and relegate the Birds to years of mediocrity. It is a Dak Prescott kind of fear and is justified. An average QB can place a franchise in purgatory.  However, on this board, it also results in a kind of alternative reality in which anything Hurts does that is positive is diminished and the negatives are amplified. Likely, it is  because there is no trust in the organization to make the right decision. They did however get rid of Wentz. I have some confidence that they will ultimately make the best decision. 

It is worth noting that it looked like Hurts got his bell rung at 2:37 of Q3. This often results in a decrease in QB effectiveness. 

Again projecting fear as motive to dismiss the opposing argument is not factual argument. Its the debate tactics of and for simpletons.

 

2 minutes ago, MillerTime said:

No Im not. Hurts had a good game. He hit multiple throws over the middle. Hit a great pass to Brown deep. No turnover. Oline didnt help. Yet you all expect Rodgers or Burrow from him who both are doing worse. 

They think admitting Hurts had a good game somehow means you are committing to him for the future