April 7, 20215 yr It still cracks me up that this sad sack was held up by the right as a "real man with balls”
April 7, 20215 yr 12 minutes ago, Gannan said: It still cracks me up that this sad sack was held up by the right as a "real man with balls” Reminiscent of this legend:
April 7, 20215 yr On 4/3/2021 at 7:09 PM, rambo said: Fake. That's not a $100 polo. I don’t think @vikas83 knows that is expensive.
April 8, 20215 yr In defense of our criminal justice system.. the goal here is to make the conviction airtight. Our justice system puts the onus on the state to prove the case, and gives the benefit of the doubt to the accused. Especially in a case here where a LEO, who tend to get deferential treatment in the courtroom as trusted public servants, stands accused of a heinous crime, the prosecution is going to go out of its way to make sure the trial proceeds carefully, deliberately, and with minimal cause for appeal. The trial should have happened sooner, I don't disagree with that. Hardly a speedy trial. But when you have a crime code that is simply far too bloated, you're going to have a backlog of criminal cases. That's a separate problem. But the reason why this case is proceeding as deliberately as it is is to make it as airtight as possible. Slip up and you might have either a hung jury or give too much for appeal.
April 8, 20215 yr 10 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: In defense of our criminal justice system.. the goal here is to make the conviction airtight. Our justice system puts the onus on the state to prove the case, and gives the benefit of the doubt to the accused. Especially in a case here where a LEO, who tend to get deferential treatment in the courtroom as trusted public servants, stands accused of a heinous crime, the prosecution is going to go out of its way to make sure the trial proceeds carefully, deliberately, and with minimal cause for appeal. The trial should have happened sooner, I don't disagree with that. Hardly a speedy trial. But when you have a crime code that is simply far too bloated, you're going to have a backlog of criminal cases. That's a separate problem. But the reason why this case is proceeding as deliberately as it is is to make it as airtight as possible. Slip up and you might have either a hung jury or give too much for appeal. I get all that, but lets get er done. Then, on to that little dbag Kyle Rittenhouse.
April 8, 20215 yr 18 minutes ago, Seventy_Yard_FG said: You guys really got your heads really far up there don’t you Don't make me denigrate you some more.
April 8, 20215 yr 59 minutes ago, downundermike said: I get all that, but lets get er done. Then, on to that little dbag Kyle Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse did nothing wrong.
April 8, 20215 yr 4 minutes ago, Bill said: Rittenhouse did nothing wrong. It is a class G felony to open carry in Wisconsin if you are under 18. Then add the murder of 3 people while in the commission of a class G felony, he did plenty wrong. Plus, having a soda bottle in a plastic bag thrown at you is not covered by self defense laws. Wisconsin law allows you to threaten or use force against another person when you reasonably believe that they intend to do you harm or illegally interfere with your person. However, you are authorized to use only the force necessary to prevent the harm or interference from occurring. This means that you may only use deadly force in self-defense if you reasonably believe that it is necessary to prevent someone from killing or doing great bodily harm to you. You are also permitted to use force to defend a third party if your intervention is necessary to protect him or her from harm. If you provoke an attack, you may not be able to claim legal self-defense against the attack unless it is likely to cause your death or great bodily harm. Even then, you must attempt every other reasonable option to escape, avoid, or prevent the attack before resorting to deadly force yourself. Additionally, you may not be entitled to a claim of self-defense if you provoked another person’s attack as an excuse for you to kill or severely harm that person.
April 8, 20215 yr 8 minutes ago, downundermike said: It is a class G felony to open carry in Wisconsin if you are under 18. Then add the murder of 3 people while in the commission of a class G felony, he did plenty wrong. Plus, having a soda bottle in a plastic bag thrown at you is not covered by self defense laws. Wisconsin law allows you to threaten or use force against another person when you reasonably believe that they intend to do you harm or illegally interfere with your person. However, you are authorized to use only the force necessary to prevent the harm or interference from occurring. This means that you may only use deadly force in self-defense if you reasonably believe that it is necessary to prevent someone from killing or doing great bodily harm to you. You are also permitted to use force to defend a third party if your intervention is necessary to protect him or her from harm. If you provoke an attack, you may not be able to claim legal self-defense against the attack unless it is likely to cause your death or great bodily harm. Even then, you must attempt every other reasonable option to escape, avoid, or prevent the attack before resorting to deadly force yourself. Additionally, you may not be entitled to a claim of self-defense if you provoked another person’s attack as an excuse for you to kill or severely harm that person. It wasn’t murder. It was self defense x3. Dude clapped a bunch of degenerates. He should be getting a medal.
April 8, 20215 yr 4 minutes ago, Bill said: It wasn’t murder. It was self defense x3. Dude clapped a bunch of degenerates. He should be getting a medal. Guess I better not throw a soda in your general direction. You will murder me and then expect a medal.
April 8, 20215 yr Just now, downundermike said: Guess I better not throw a soda in your general direction. You will murder me and then expect a medal. Gatorade me, bish.
April 8, 20215 yr 3 minutes ago, Bill said: Gatorade me, bish. Gotta love the gun guy culture. Underaged kid, from another state, open carrying in violation of Wisconsin state law murders 3 people, and you want to give him a medal. Now he is hanging out with the proud boys in a bar and drinking, also illegal.
April 8, 20215 yr 58 minutes ago, downundermike said: Gotta love the gun guy culture. Underaged kid, from another state, open carrying in violation of Wisconsin state law murders 3 people, and you want to give him a medal. Now he is hanging out with the proud boys in a bar and drinking, also illegal. He was open carrying at a private business. Which is perfectly legal. They chased him into public. Also from the "another state” trope is getting tired. Dude was from a few miles away from where it happened, just across the state lines. His life was threatened by an angry mob hellbent on destruction. He clapped three of them. Not to mention one was a chomo and another was a domestic abuser who was legally prohibited from possessing the pistol he had when he tried to shoot Rittenhouse. Good riddance to them all. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Create an account or sign in to comment