1 hour ago, Paul852 said:

Straight dem, of course.

Always amazing how so many thing in Indiana are uncontested

Just now, Diehardfan said:

Again, go by the standard you give me. What MSM is running this? There weren't signs in the Slovakian election deep fakes until after. So again, what MSM is running this according to the standards you all set?

Republicans: The media's suppressing Epstein stories!  They've been protecting the guilty for years!  What are they hiding!?!

Also Republicans: Why isn't the media running with an Epstein story?

1 minute ago, VanHammersly said:

Republicans: The media's suppressing Epstein stories!  They've been protecting the guilty for years!  What are they hiding!?!

Also Republicans: Why isn't the media running with an Epstein story?

So what you are saying is you can't live up to your self imposed standards on this, but since it goes your way you have no shame about being a hypocrite. Got it.

we knew then but it makes more sense now. 

 

 

 

6 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

So what you are saying is you can't live up to your self imposed standards on this, but since it goes your way you have no shame about being a hypocrite. Got it.

My standards are to look at it and see if it adds up.  It's hard evidence recordings, so we don't have to take anyone's word here (on anything we're hearing anyway, we'll see if he really he has 100 hours of additional recordings).  The only questions are whether that's really his voice (sounds like it is) and whether it's AI (there's none of the signs of AI in it).  As for the mythical "mainstream media" coverage, plenty of outlets have covered it already.   Plenty more will, I'm sure.

There is never any evidence a Trumpcuck will accept, if it is bad for Trump.

None. He cheats a children's cancer charity, and they look the other way, and refuse to discuss. Or they make excuses for it.

Under no circumstance will any self-examination happen.

2 hours ago, xBMTx said:

Garbage thing again?

Bunch of hypocritical snowflakes

sit back, try to imagine how fragile of a man you have to be to be bothered by what biden said. 

 

OLD MAN MEAN WORDS HURT!

 

 

SAD!!!

Same goes for Romney, or Amash, or any other number of Republicans who put country over party.

 

15 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

My standards are to look at it and see if it adds up.  It's hard evidence recordings, so we don't have to take anyone's word here (on anything we're hearing anyway, we'll see if he really he has 100 hours of additional recordings).  The only questions are whether that's really his voice (sounds like it is) and whether it's AI (there's none of the signs of AI in it).  As for the mythical "mainstream media" coverage, plenty of outlets have covered it already.   Plenty more will, I'm sure.

No, your standards and those of the rest of the TDS folk are is it in the MSM. You can't live up to that and you know you'd be giving me a rash of crap if I posted that.

And you do not have the equipment to verify if it is a fake.

4 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

sit back, try to imagine how fragile of a man you have to be to be bothered by what biden said. 

 

OLD MAN MEAN WORDS HURT!

 

 

SAD!!!

biden made them walk around wearing garbage bags    

1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Same goes for Romney, or Amash, or any other number of Republicans who put country over party.

They're also the very same people that voted for Cheney twice and 100% supported the war in Iraq, while calling the liberals who opposed it unAmerican.  In no way shape or form is anyone in MAGA antiwar. 

 

9 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

There is never any evidence a Trumpcuck will accept, if it is bad for Trump.

None. He cheats a children's cancer charity, and they look the other way, and refuse to discuss. Or they make excuses for it.

Under no circumstance will any self-examination happen.

8 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

There is never any evidence a Trumpcuck will accept, if it is bad for Trump.

None. He cheats a children's cancer charity, and they look the other way, and refuse to discuss. Or they make excuses for it.

Under no circumstance will any self-examination happen.

Trump, on live tv, could walk on stage, rape, murder, eat a 5 year old, pull down his pants and take a crap on stage and wed still hear "fake news!"."it's AI!"

I'm done dealing with people who want to be in a cult and live in their own reality where the only truth is from the Mango Mussolini 

Just now, Diehardfan said:

 Says the one who ignores anything negative about trump as fake 

In a Halloween parade, maga is a sickness and yes, if you see nothing wrong with this, you are literal garbage 

5 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

 

Fake news but it fits your narrative so you are cool with it being another hypocrite. He was talking about her being a warmonger sending other people to fight but she wouldn't want to be the soldier. He's spot on. Full clip here that you'll ignore.

 

1 minute ago, Diehardfan said:

Fake news but it fits your narrative so you are cool with it being another hypocrite. He was talking about her being a warmonger sending other people to fight but she wouldn't want to be the soldier. He's spot on.

 

You can get up and dress yourself? Hold a job?

Hard to believe, given your mental handicap.

Just now, Toastrel said:

hahahhahaa she is as big of a triggered drama queen lying sack of crap as some on here. He was saying she'd never make it as a soldier but loves sending others.

3 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

You can get up and dress yourself? Hold a job?

Hard to believe, given your mental handicap.

Hey, I posed a gif of you above. It fits. So does deranged and demonic.

9 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

No, your standards and those of the rest of the TDS folk are is it in the MSM. You can't live up to that and you know you'd be giving me a rash of crap if I posted that.

And you do not have the equipment to verify if it is a fake.

  You're flailing dude.  I already told you my standard for something being true.  It's a recording.  If it's a real recording (which as far as I can tell, it is), it's true.  The coverage is irrelevant in that equation.   It's legitimately retarded that you're still arguing with me about this.

2 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

  You're flailing dude.  I already told you my standard for something being true.  It's a recording.  If it's a real recording (which as far as I can tell, it is), it's true.  The coverage is irrelevant in that equation.   It's legitimately retarded that you're still arguing with me about this.

I'm flailing? hahaha here comes another Harris Oreo story as JD said on Rogan. I flat out called you out for being a hypocrite who can't live up to his own self imposed standards and you are posting a bunch of words that are meaningless to change that. You know it but keep posting to save face or just have to "own" people as you said you love to do to fill whatever emptiness you have in your life.