October 6, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: That's not how it works. You shared the claim that they're getting $13k Visa cards. Back it up. They don’t GAF if something is true or not. They are gonna eat that entire can of Pringles, even when they are stale.
October 6, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Talkingbirds said: New York giving $350/wk to migrants via debit card ? Funds not coming from FEMA though. https://council.nyc.gov/joseph-borelli/2024/07/03/nyc-to-spend-millions-on-new-round-of-pre-paid-debit-cards-for-migrants/ Right and even that works out to like $12 a person a day for just food and baby supplies. If they have a problem with that, fine. Don't go to NY. But this nonsense that Kamala is giving 13k to every illegal is obviously false and yet people just blindly accept it.
October 6, 20241 yr 37 minutes ago, Paul852 said: Right and even that works out to like $12 a person a day for just food and baby supplies. If they have a problem with that, fine. Don't go to NY. But this nonsense that Kamala is giving 13k to every illegal is obviously false and yet people just blindly accept it. It comes from as ridiculous a place as possible: Twitter. Some guy claims to have just followed "Venezuelan refugees" to a store, saw them use a visa card, they of course conveniently dropped their receipt, and they receipt showed a $13k balance on the Visa card. Totally credible.
October 6, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, JohnSnowsHair said: That's not how it works. You shared the claim that they're getting $13k Visa cards. Back it up. No - you dispute it. I posted something. You said it is wrong. Prove it wrong with what you say is correct.
October 6, 20241 yr 5 minutes ago, Procus said: No - you dispute it. I posted something. You said it is wrong. Prove it wrong with what you say is correct. If I say wildfires are caused by Jewish Space Lasers and you say I'm wrong because there's no such thing as Jewish Space Lasers, should I shift the burden of proof back to you to prove they don't exist? Is this how a supposed "lawyer" thinks it works?
October 6, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: If I say wildfires are caused by Jewish Space Lasers and you say I'm wrong and they don't even exist, should I shift the burden of proof to you to prove they don't exist? Is this how a supposed "lawyer" thinks it works? I think I know who Procus is now...
October 6, 20241 yr 9 minutes ago, Procus said: No - you dispute it. I posted something. You said it is wrong. Prove it wrong with what you say is correct. This is infantile logic
October 6, 20241 yr 23 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: If I say wildfires are caused by Jewish Space Lasers and you say I'm wrong because there's no such thing as Jewish Space Lasers, should I shift the burden of proof back to you to prove they don't exist? Is this how a supposed "lawyer" thinks it works? He’s a lawyer? LOL
October 6, 20241 yr 24 minutes ago, Procus said: No - you dispute it. I posted something. You said it is wrong. Prove it wrong with what you say is correct. That’s not how it works. You have to prove that your claim is true with some sort of "credible” evidence. You don’t have to be a lawyer to understand how the burden of proof works.
October 6, 20241 yr 32 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said: This is logic FYP How the f can you possibly defend flying illegals into the country and giving them benefits. You people are twisted.
October 6, 20241 yr 13 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said: That’s not how it works. You have to prove that your claim is true with some sort of "credible” evidence. You don’t have to be a lawyer to understand how the burden of proof works. We'll need a citation to the EMB rule book for that statement.
October 6, 20241 yr 26 minutes ago, WentzFan11 said: He’s a lawyer? LOL So he claims. Law school acceptance standards must've been super low back in the 1960's.
October 6, 20241 yr 7 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: So he claims. Law school acceptance standards must've been super low back in the 1960's. Did Trump University give out law degrees?
October 6, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, Tnt4philly said: It’s possible to show compassion for, and help more than one group of people at the same time. 🤣
October 6, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Procus said: No - you dispute it. I posted something. You said it is wrong. Prove it wrong with what you say is correct. There is absolutely zero chance you were ever a lawyer.
October 6, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, we_gotta_believe said: If I say wildfires are caused by Jewish Space Lasers and you say I'm wrong because there's no such thing as Jewish Space Lasers, should I shift the burden of proof back to you to prove they don't exist? Is this how a supposed "lawyer" thinks it works? #1 - we are not in a court of law, we are on the Eagles Message Board #2 - I copied and pasted a tweet. If somebody disagrees, they are free to post something disproving it. The original poster is under no obligation to post further information to back up the tweet. Of course, if you disagree, you are free to post the rules which state otherwise.
October 6, 20241 yr 7 minutes ago, Paul852 said: There is absolutely zero chance you were ever a lawyer. zero - because this is legal matter in a legal forum There is absolutely zero chance you have a functioning brain
October 6, 20241 yr 19 hours ago, Diehardfan said: Looking at the polls he's ahead or trending up, so most people are saying my bad they are worse. fake news
October 6, 20241 yr 57 minutes ago, Procus said: FYP How the f can you possibly defend flying illegals into the country and giving them benefits. You people are twisted. No is doing that. Strawman and more infantile thinking you made a baseless claim, evidently here is how logic works. Your claim is essentially the hypothesis. In actual thinking, this would be based on some evidence you can draw a reasonable conclusion from. If the hypothesis is tested and fails, then the null holds and the claim is deemed false unless further data are submitted. just take the L and please learn how to actually make an intelligent argument
October 6, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, we_gotta_believe said: If I say wildfires are caused by Jewish Space Lasers and you say I'm wrong because there's no such thing as Jewish Space Lasers, should I shift the burden of proof back to you to prove they don't exist? Is this how a supposed "lawyer" thinks it works? If he's a lawyer, I'm the king of Siam.
October 6, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, Procus said: #1 - we are not in a court of law, we are on the Eagles Message Board #2 - I copied and pasted a tweet. If somebody disagrees, they are free to post something disproving it. The original poster is under no obligation to post further information to back up the tweet. Of course, if you disagree, you are free to post the rules which state otherwise. If i tweet that you are a traitor is the burden of proof on you to disprove it? logic hint: it is impossible to disprove a negative. Thats why a hypothesis must be a positive assertion to be valid
October 6, 20241 yr Just now, ToastJenkins said: If i tweet that you are a traitor is the burden of proof on you to disprove it? logic hint: it is impossible to disprove a negative. Thats why a hypothesis must be a positive assertion to be valid There is no burden of proof whatsoever on a football chat board. Zero. There is no burden of proof in a disagreement outside of a legal proceeding. Do you even know what a burden of proof is and where it is applicable?
October 6, 20241 yr 10 minutes ago, Procus said: The original poster is under no obligation to post further information to back up the tweet. Of course, if you disagree, you are free to post the rules which state otherwise. Big if true...
Create an account or sign in to comment